A proven tool for losing weight: Reading food labels

Sep 15, 2010

Diet and exercise have long been the top two elements of effective weight loss. Now add a third: reading the labels on packaged foods.

Washington State University Economist Bidisha Mandal has found that middle-aged Americans who want to lose weight and who take up the label-reading habit are more likely to lose weight than those who don't. In some cases, label reading is even more effective than exercise.

"I'm finding that reading labels is useful," said Mandal, an assistant professor in the WSU School of Economic Sciences. "People who are trying to lose weight want to know what they're buying and preparing and many do better if they use labels to find what they need to know."

Writing in the latest , Mandal analyzes the responses of more than 3,700 people who regularly took a national survey asking about their label-reading habits while attempting to lose or control their weight. Among her findings:

  • If you want to lose weight, you have a better chance of success if you read a food label when you first buy a product.
  • People are more successful at losing weight when they add label reading to their exercise program.
  • Label readers who do not exercise have a slightly greater chance of losing weight than those who exercise but do not read labels.
  • Women are more likely to read when they buy a product for the first time, possibly because they are responsible for buying food and cooking. They are also more successful than men in losing weight.
  • In a case of good news and bad news, Mandal found that overweight and obese label readers are more likely to lose weight. But only a little more than one-third lost weight, while nearly half gained weight. This confirms what many middle-aged people know— is hard and often unsuccessful. But Mandal found overweight and obese people at least have a better chance if they read the label.
The analysis underscores the value of the U.S. Nutrition Labeling and Education Act, which has required standardized nutrition facts on packaged foods since 1994, Mandal said. She adds that the findings build the case for posting nutritional information on vending machines and in many restaurants, as planned under the new federal health care reform bill.

Explore further: Extreme weather kills 2,000 in U.S. each year: CDC

Provided by Washington State University

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Less is more for label readers, research shows

Feb 20, 2007

Apparently, most grocery-store goers shop for what they don’t want. Of course, they don’t want calories. But what about looking for the good stuff — the vitamins, nutrients, and other goodies listed on ...

Organic food can sabotage diet and weight-loss

Jun 30, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- While organic food may contain fewer, if any, pesticides and additives, consumers mistakenly believe it also has fewer calories, say researchers at the University of Michigan.

Recommended for you

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JSC22
not rated yet Sep 15, 2010
Since the beginning of this year I have tried to only buy foods from the grocery store that have 5 or less ingredients. Or ingredients that I can at least pronounce. I feel like it has made a difference in my appetite (stay satisfied longer) and in the way I look (better:). There is some truth to the article. I also subscribed to the blog below. I love it, so much good, real health info: http://blog.mydis...lth.com/