Yes you can build a low-cost 'green' house

Sep 07, 2010 By Andy Mead

The greenest house in Lewis County, Ky., is a pleasant shade of blue -- and a model for future low-income housing. It is LEED-certified by the U.S. Green Building Council, which means it is an energy-efficient, durable and healthy place to live.

"I really like it," said Melissa Evans, a county schools employee who bought the 1,120-square foot and plans to live there with her 10-year-old daughter, Jaycee.

The sale price, offset somewhat by a grant, was $90,000, with low interest rates and the promise of lower utility and maintenance costs in the future.

The house was built by a non-profit organization called People's Self-Help Housing Inc., which has been building low-income houses in the county since 1982.

People's has built and sold 275 houses, and it built and manages 120 rental units.

Unlike Habitat for Humanity, People's hires people to build houses.

"We don't have a lot of resources in Lewis County as far as people and businesses, so our goal is to train local folks and provide jobs," said Dave Kreher, People's executive director.

A couple of years ago, on People's 25th anniversary, the board of directors decided that new houses had to be more efficient to offset rapidly increasing utility rates.

"People can afford the financing to buy the homes but they can't afford to pay the utilities," Kreher said.

Recent People's houses have been Energy Star-rated and use about one-third less energy than standard houses of their size. There also have been a couple of homes that heat water and produce some electricity from solar rays.

There are only two LEED houses officially listed in Kentucky, a silver-rated house in Lexington that was built in 2006, and a gold-rated house in Covington that was completed earlier this year.

The house in downtown Vanceburg will be No. 3, and it has enough points to qualify for a gold rating (the scale is certified, silver, gold and platinum).

Tom Fern, state director of rural development for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, said the house is an important step in helping people with low incomes "achieve their dream of home ownership" and helps keep them in those homes.

He noted that Lewis County -- which is in northeastern Kentucky and has a population of about 14,000 -- is one of 43 counties in the state where poverty is considered persistent. In 2008, he said, Vanceburg's median income was less than $21,000, or about half the state average.

LEED certification was sought for the Rowley house because People's realized that its recent houses were good enough to qualify, Kreher said.

He said that he is not sure that certification will be sought for future houses because of the extra cost, but that most of the things that earned points for the LEED rating can become standard in other homes.

They include:

• Durability: The siding is fiber cement, which lasts longer than regular siding and holds paint longer.

• Insulation: The walls are built with two-by-six studs instead of two-by-four. That saves money because fewer studs are needed, and more insulation can fit in the walls. The roof trusses are raised where the roof meets the wall, also to accommodate more insulation.

• Water: The house has plumbing fixtures, such as dual-flush toilets, that will require less water. The yard is small and has drought-tolerant plants.

• Equipment: Lights, washer, dryer, fans and refrigerator all are certified and will use less .

Greg Miller, People's director of design and construction technologies, said that even the house's location will save the homeowner money and go easy on the environment.

"It's within walking distance or a short drive from a lot of things," he said. "Being here in downtown Vanceburg, there's a grocery, there's the library, the police department, the fire department, most of your day-to-day needs."

The cost to build the house was about $115,000, Miller said.

But some of the costs were higher because carpenters and other workers weren't familiar with techniques like using two-by-six studs. He thinks the house could be built again and come in much closer to $90,000.

And, he said, it is a house that will last.

"We're not using the cheapest material, but the most durable material," he said. "So over the lifetime of the house, it will be cheaper for the homeowner."

Explore further: Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city

5 /5 (8 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Opening day for a home of the future

Jan 28, 2008

The first of six properties designed to show case state-of-the-art energy efficient housing will be officially opened on Wednesday January 30 2008 at The University of Nottingham.

The future of solar-powered houses is clear

Apr 10, 2008

The future of solar-powered houses is clear. People could live in glass houses and look at the world through rose-tinted windows while reducing their carbon emissions by 50 percent thanks to QUT Institute ...

Energy-efficient house a wish come true for Santa

Dec 20, 2004

Christmas costs can make us all a bit less jolly, but there are a number of ways even Ole St. Nick can save money throughout the year and help offset the high cost of the holiday. For openers, the Clauses could live in ...

1930s home goes green

Aug 05, 2009

A 1930s house built in 2008 is about to undergo the first of three energy efficiency upgrades which will ultimately convert an energy inefficient house into a zero carbon home designed to meet the Government's 2016 CO2 targets fo ...

Recommended for you

Obama launches measures to support solar energy in US

Apr 17, 2014

The White House Thursday announced a series of measures aimed at increasing solar energy production in the United States, particularly by encouraging the installation of solar panels in public spaces.

Tailored approach key to cookstove uptake

Apr 17, 2014

Worldwide, programs aiming to give safe, efficient cooking stoves to people in developing countries haven't had complete success—and local research has looked into why.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

stealthc
not rated yet Sep 08, 2010
I've worked on various leed certified sites. You wouldn't believe the sorta crap that goes into the garbage bin. That aside leed doesn't do enough. Self-sufficient should be the goal, houses should have their own power generation and water filtration, perhaps a means to cool using a nearby water source, and other goodies. I am unimpressed -- energy efficiency is not important when just getting off the grid achieves so much more -- and the prices they charge for these places I would expect this much, not what they give out. Lame.
Eikka
not rated yet Sep 08, 2010
energy efficiency is not important when just getting off the grid achieves so much more


You try do that with a whole street of houses and see how easy and cheap it is.

Usually you end up going "off the grid" like the "Survivorman" Les Stroud who used propane to run half of the house and solar panels for just the lighting.
BuddyEbsen
not rated yet Sep 09, 2010
Leed is just a measurement, there are many levels of Leed certification, silver, gold, platinum. Saying it doesn't go far enough is a bit odd. Leed doesn't stop you at any point, go as green as you like.

More news stories

LinkedIn membership hits 300 million

The career-focused social network LinkedIn announced Friday it has 300 million members, with more than half the total outside the United States.

Treating depression in Parkinson's patients

A group of scientists from the University of Kentucky College of Medicine and the Sanders-Brown Center on Aging has found interesting new information in a study on depression and neuropsychological function in Parkinson's ...