China closes factories as green deadline looms

Aug 22, 2010 by Allison Jackson
An iron and steel mill lies idle after it was ordered to shut down for polluting the Xiangjiang river basin in Loudi, central China's Hunan province. China has ordered thousands of companies to close high-polluting plants, in what analysts say is a last-ditch effort by Beijing to meet environmental targets by year's end or risk embarrassment.

China, facing the risk of embarrassment if it misses a looming environmental deadline, has ordered thousands of companies to close high-polluting plants as its leadership vies to retool economic growth.

Beijing has pledged to slash China's per unit of by 20 percent between 2006 and 2010, as the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter seeks to reduce pollution and clean up its environment.

Official data suggest China is likely to miss the year-end deadline -- potentially causing red faces for top leaders who have trumpeted efforts to curb emissions growth and develop .

"It is a gesture to show that the country is trying its best to achieve the target," Andy Xie, an independent economist based in Shanghai, told AFP.

"The leaders need to save face."

Beijing this month ordered 2,087 firms producing steel, coal, cement, aluminium, glass and other materials to close their old and obsolete plants by the end of September -- or risk having bank loans frozen and power cut off.

Authorities in the eastern province of Anhui have reportedly already cut off electricity to more than 500 factories for a month after they failed to meet emission reduction targets.

But only about a dozen factories will be closed entirely, with the rest ordered to shut down specific production capacity, according to the government order.

Tianjin Tiangang Union Iron and Steel Co. in northern China, for example, has been told to close two furnaces while Chaofeng Construction Materials Co., also based in northern China, has been told to shutter two production lines.

The move comes after China in July scrapped preferential power rates for energy-intensive industries, which had reduced their electricity bills by an estimated 15 billion yuan (2.2 billion dollars), according to state media.

Leaders in Beijing have been keen to promote their green credentials.

Ahead of global climate talks in Copenhagen last year, they pledged to reduce China's carbon intensity -- the measure of emitted per unit of economic activity -- by 40-45 percent by 2020 based on 2005 levels.

China has earmarked 738 billion dollars to invest in developing clean energy over the next decade as it seeks to meet a target of generating 15 percent of its energy from renewable sources -- mainly wind and water -- by 2020.

It will host an extra round of climate talks in October before a UN summit in Mexico at the end of the year, as nations attempt to devise a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, whose binding targets expire in 2012.

"If Beijing fails to hit the 2010 target by a wide margin, its credibility on climate change commitments will be subject to a great deal of international scepticism," said Damien Ma, an analyst with the New York-based Eurasia Group, a political risk research and consulting firm.

At the end of 2009, China had reduced its energy consumption per unit of GDP by 14 percent, analysts said. But in the first six months of this year, it rose 0.09 percent -- the first year-on-year increase since 2006.

Striking a balance between maintaining economic growth and reducing pollution is difficult, Australian academic Frank Jotzo told AFP.

"They have got a really big battle at hand with the very rapid expansion of the economy," said Jotzo, deputy director of the Climate Change Institute at Australian National University.

While previous attempts to close high-polluting factories have been less than successful -- new plants often rise from the ashes of the old ones -- the stakes are much higher this time, analysts say.

The central government has been "leaning hard" on local officials, threatening to rescind their promotions if they fail to meet energy reduction targets, said Ma.

"I think the government understands that if it misses the 20 percent target, it will reflect very badly on China's reputation," said Yang Ailun, climate and energy campaign manager at Greenpeace China.

Yang likened the closure of factories to putting a band-aid over China's pollution woes, which have been worsened by decades of rampant economic growth.

"These factories should be phased out but it would be much better for the government to send out a very clear and long-term (energy) pricing signal and then design effective policies in support of that," she said.

Explore further: Nile River monitoring influences northeast Africa's future

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Researchers say China's export trade impacts climate

Jul 29, 2008

Carnegie Mellon University's Christopher L. Weber argues that China's new title as the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter is at least partly due to consumption of Chinese goods in the West.

China surpasses US as world's top energy consumer

Jul 20, 2010

(AP) -- China has overtaken the United States as the world's largest energy consumer, the International Energy Agency said Tuesday. China immediately questioned the report, claiming its calculations were ...

China to be 3rd biggest wind power producer: media

Jan 01, 2010

China is set to become the world's third largest wind power producer in 2009, state media reported, as the Asian giant seeks various ways to expand energy supply to power its economic boom.

China: rich nations must cut emissions by 40 pct

May 22, 2009

(AP) -- Wealthy nations, as history's biggest polluters, should cut greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, China says in a policy document on climate change. The government also rolled out fresh ...

China: Will ensure stimulus protects environment

Jun 05, 2009

(AP) -- China said Friday it will strictly monitor the government's economic stimulus package for projects that cause pollution, addressing worries that officials would ignore the environment in an effort to maintain China's ...

US, Europe look to China for clean energy sales

May 17, 2010

(AP) -- U.S. leaders want China's clean energy boom to drive technology exports and are sending a sales mission to Beijing this week. But Beijing wants to create its own suppliers of wind, solar and other equipment and is ...

Recommended for you

Unforeseen dioxin formation in waste incineration

55 minutes ago

Dioxins forms faster, at lower temperatures and under other conditions than previously thought. This may affect how we in the future construct sampling equipment, flue gas filtering systems for waste incineration ...

Crowdsourcing could lead to better water in rural India

2 hours ago

With more than 10 million service points, India's rural drinking water system provides a real monitoring headache for public health officials. To help address the challenge, a three-continent research consortium ...

Far more displaced by disasters than conflict

14 hours ago

Disasters last year displaced three times more people than violent conflicts, showing the urgent need to improve resilience for vulnerable people when fighting climate change, according to a study issued ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ereneon
3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 22, 2010
Good to see that they're at least trying, even if it is only for publicity.
marjon
2 / 5 (4) Aug 22, 2010
Let's just make a law to make the bad economy go away. That will fix everything.
TabulaMentis
3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 22, 2010
Economies all around the world would improve if tighter pollution standards were enforced.

P.S.: Do not tell George W. Bush I said that.
jbl
3 / 5 (4) Aug 22, 2010
It would be interesting to monitor the closures and see what connection they have with the jet stream bringing pollutants to the West coast of the United States. It may have a connection to the worries of the USFS over the plight over the giant redwoods as well.
Bob_Kob
3 / 5 (2) Aug 23, 2010
I'm all for the reductions but isnt shutting down manufacturing in this financial crisis going to make it worse?
TabulaMentis
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 23, 2010
I'm all for the reductions but isnt shutting down manufacturing in this financial crisis going to make it worse?

If everyone worked together to lower pollution, then new technologies would increase employment.
The trick is to get everyone to work together without somebody trying to take advantage.
frajo
2.7 / 5 (3) Aug 23, 2010
I'm all for the reductions but isnt shutting down manufacturing in this financial crisis going to make it worse?
We are talking about China. What financial crisis?
evolutionarily
not rated yet Aug 23, 2010
I think of all the people in the factories who have worked hard their whole life to have the government tell them out of nowhere; im sorry you lose your job for the publicity of some air pollution cuts, a problem that you as a person per capita have barely contributed towards, and created by people much richer than you and only now worried about it as they are in the lucky position of being further down along the economic-development train... I think I really do like Capitalism better, create a market for it and the invisible hand will make it disappear ;)
NotAsleep
5 / 5 (2) Aug 23, 2010
China set a standard for their industries to meet and when it wasn't met they... enforced the standard? It must be pretty neat to live in a country where you actually have to do what you say you're going to do
Modernmystic
1 / 5 (4) Aug 23, 2010
China set a standard for their industries to meet and when it wasn't met they... enforced the standard? It must be pretty neat to live in a country where you actually have to do what you say you're going to do


The Communists are far more worried about "face" than they are about making companies comply with their directives for the "sake of the environment". I've little doubt that, if they thought it would cause them no embarrassment, the leaders of the country would be more concerned about the weather this coming weekend...
NotAsleep
5 / 5 (2) Aug 23, 2010
Is that a bad thing?

They didn't have to tell the international community that they planned on reducing carbon intensity. They obviously went into the Copenhagen discussions with the intention of meeting those objectives.

It's not like they're pledging to supply the world with 10% more puppies and kittens than anyone else. They're enforcing standards that they don't HAVE to enforce to produce an effect that is more than just cosmetic