'Fused' people eager to die and kill for their group, research shows

Aug 12, 2010

People with extremely strong ties to their countries or groups are not only willing, but eager, to sacrifice themselves to save their compatriots, according to new psychology research from The University of Texas at Austin.

In a study to appear in Psychological Science, Bill Swann, professor of psychology, and a team of researchers found the majority of "fused" people, those who view themselves as completely immersed in a group (be it ethnic, national or other), are willing to commit extreme acts for the good of their compatriots.

"Fused group members believe that through suicide, their lives will achieve tremendous significance," Swann said. "Their strong sense of moral agency drives them to see not only that justice is done, but to also take an active role in its implementation."

The psychology researchers who co-authored the study included Sonia Hart of The University of Texas at Austin, Angel Gomez of Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia in Spain, John F. Dovidio of Yale University and Jolanda Jetten of the University of Queensland.

In the study, the researchers recruited 506 college students at the Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia in Spain. Based on the students' answers in online questionnaires, the researchers identified 38 percent of the participants as "fused" as compared to "non-fused," with Spain. They then measured their self-sacrificial behaviors.

To test the subjects' willingness to die for their group, the researchers based their Web surveys on different variations of the "Trolley Problem." Coined by British philosopher Judith Jarvis Thomas in 1967, the "Trolley Problem" presents a hypothetical moral dilemma in which a person must choose whether to kill one person to save five strangers from a fatal trolley collision either by pushing a man in front of the tracks or simply flipping a switch that would automatically kill an innocent bystander. To put a new spin on the , the researchers added self-sacrifice as a means of saving a member of their group from a runaway trolley.

The study revealed that an overwhelming majority of fused respondents are willing to take extreme, bold steps to save the lives of their group members. According to the findings:

  • 75 percent are willing to jump to their deaths to save the lives of five group members, compared to 25 percent of participants who were not fused with their country.
  • 88 percent said they would die to save five members of an extended in-group (Europe), but not members of an out-group (America). The researchers used Europe as an example of an extended in-group (outsiders with close cultural or moral affiliations) because of its common social, political and economic ties to Spain. They used America as an example of an out-group because it is far removed from Spain.
  • When given the option to push aside a fellow group member who is about to sacrifice himself to kill some escaped terrorists, 63 percent said they would push the group member aside so they, themselves, could leap to their deaths to divert a train that would then kill the terrorists.

Swann said the study may offer new insights into the mindsets of groups with extremist ideology.

"In an era in which the act of sacrificing one's own life for the group has had world-altering consequences, it is critical to learn more about the psychological underpinnings of such activity," Swann said.

Explore further: US psychiatry gets makeover in new manual

Related Stories

Moral dilemma scenarios prone to biases

Dec 14, 2009

Picture the following hypothetical scenario: A trolley is headed toward five helpless victims. The trolley can be redirected so that only one person's life is at stake. Psychologists and philosophers have been using moral ...

Picky preschoolers: Young children prefer majority opinion

Mar 13, 2009

When we are faced with a decision, and we're not sure what to do, usually we'll just go with the majority opinion. When do we begin adopting this strategy of "following the crowd"? In a new report in Psychological Science, a jour ...

We work harder against lesser rivals, new study shows

Feb 24, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- People will work harder -- about 30 percent harder -- against members of a lower status group because the prospect of losing to those we want to keep below us poses threats we don't want to face, according ...

Recommended for you

US psychiatry gets makeover in new manual

10 hours ago

The latest makeover to a massive psychiatric tome honored by some, reviled by others and even called the "Bible" of mental disorders is being released Saturday with a host of new changes.

Skydiving is never plane sailing

May 17, 2013

Skydivers show the same level of physical stress before every jump whether a first-timer or experienced jumper, say Northumbria researchers.

Bach to the blues, our emotions match music to colors

May 16, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—Whether we're listening to Bach or the blues, our brains are wired to make music-color connections depending on how the melodies make us feel, according to new research from the University ...

User comments : 12

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
5 / 5 (3) Aug 12, 2010
Remember the Alamo!

Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!

Nuts!

Half a league, half a league, half a league, onward.
On through the valley of death rode the six hundred.
MadPutz
5 / 5 (1) Aug 12, 2010
Ethical "dilemmas" like the trolley problem are misleading because people are not a uniform currency. You could be killing some guy who's offspring will cure cancer and lead society to technological utopia while saving 4 average guys and 1 criminal who end up leading society to a mediocre piece of poverty. I guess the study simply shows how strong tribalism can be, call it "fused" if you want - but there's already enough proof in current events and human history, just look at Islamic Extremists, IRA, any militant, etc.
winthrom
5 / 5 (1) Aug 12, 2010
Then the suicide bombers believe that they are saving the lives of their fellow (extremist) group members and that the innocent people they kill in the process are outsiders not worthy of saving.

This means that the manner in which fused people are integrated into their community (think nation vs tribe) is critical to resolving the martar problems in the mid-east. The last administration assumed that the tribes of the mid-east were able to think nationalistically, and this study (and current history) shows that was a false assumption.
Caliban
5 / 5 (3) Aug 12, 2010
There is already a term for people of this type. In the common usage, they are known as "Zealots".
I suppose the new "fused" moniker is an attempt to both jargonize and objectivise at the same time, with the direct benefit of decoupling some of the overt link with religion that is implicit in "zealot".
frajo
5 / 5 (1) Aug 12, 2010
Then the suicide bombers believe that they are saving the lives of their fellow (extremist) group members and that the innocent people they kill in the process are outsiders not worthy of saving.
There's already a term for the latter. They are called "collateral damages".
RobertKLR
3 / 5 (2) Aug 12, 2010
Rather obvious.
KBK
5 / 5 (3) Aug 13, 2010
It is a known fact that is derived via those who utilize thought process and deduction..that tribal religions are inherently dangerous. These religions Catholicism, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, etc, are used by their "leaders" as a system of control and manipulation. You even see much of it in the corporate cults of the machines of war. Ie, armies, etc.

Unfortunately, most of the world's population are as dumb as a bag of hammers when it comes to getting their minds out of their ego and stretching their vision a bit to see over the fence that marks the borders of their self erected worlds.

Point being, is you need to BE the change you want to see in the world. Even here on pyhsorg, we see emotionally derived logic dominating, as we do elsewhere.

If you understand that corporatism (fascism) is deep inside all these issues - take that knowledge outward, take it to everyone you meet.

You can't be a lazy monkey anymore - there is nowhere left to hide, the fascism has crept that far.
LRW
2 / 5 (4) Aug 13, 2010
Shared ritual has the effect of reinforcing group identification.
Commitment to evaluation of a decision as having been correctly made is proportional to the effort associated with the decision (for example, the more you spent on your purchase, the more you tell yoursef it was a good buy).
Islam requires you to do ritual five times a day, at the same time as others who identify themselves as Muslims.
That`s a lot of effort---and promotes a lot of solidarity.
The human brain is the best guidance system for mobile weapons imaginable.
Ramadan is upon us. Watch out!
trekgeek1
5 / 5 (3) Aug 13, 2010
I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong.
-Bertrand Russell
jerryd
5 / 5 (1) Aug 14, 2010

Fused/Zealots are always dangerous because they are easily fooled, lead. They think so little of themselves and will do anything to be in a group.

Sadly critical thinking isn't that common. Most people are sheep. All you have to do is look at their work, buying patterns and easy to see most are conned/slaves of the corporations willingly.

Take smoking for instance. All it does is addict them to be slaves to big tobacco.

Little thought in actually being happy, just in getting the most useless junk, being part of the crowd.
bottomlesssoul
3 / 5 (2) Aug 15, 2010
It's great this is finally being discussed as a mental illness. It is and ridding oneself of it really does improve quality of life.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2010
Sadly critical thinking isn't that common.
Yes. Fortunately, uncritical thinking is easily detectable. Amongst others as a generalizing statement as a result of a careless application of the method of induction.

One textbook case: 75 percent of the people you meet during your past life are "sheep". From that experience you induce that 75 percent of the 7 billion inhabitants of this planet are "sheep", too. Then you say:
Most people are sheep.

Not to mention the missing definition of "sheep" people which is an indicator that it is an undefined, colloquial term only which easily might be used mutually.

More news stories

US psychiatry gets makeover in new manual

The latest makeover to a massive psychiatric tome honored by some, reviled by others and even called the "Bible" of mental disorders is being released Saturday with a host of new changes.

New case of SARS-like virus in Saudi: ministry

A new case of the deadly coronavirus has been detected in Saudi Arabia where 15 people have already died after contracting it, the health ministry announced on Saturday on its Internet website.

US seizes Bitcoin operator accounts

US authorities seized the accounts of a Bitcoin digital currency exchange operator, claiming it was functioning as an "unlicensed money service business," court documents showed Friday.

Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt

Morocco is ploughing ahead with a programme to boost wind energy production, particularly in the southern Tarfaya region, where Africa's largest wind farm is set to open in 2014.