In breakthrough, nerve connections are regenerated after spinal cord injury

Aug 08, 2010

Researchers for the first time have induced robust regeneration of nerve connections that control voluntary movement after spinal cord injury, showing the potential for new therapeutic approaches to paralysis and other motor function impairments.

In a study on rodents, the UC Irvine, UC San Diego and Harvard University team achieved this breakthrough by turning back the developmental clock in a molecular pathway critical for the growth of corticospinal tract nerve connections.

They did this by deleting an enzyme called PTEN (a phosphatase and tensin homolog), which controls a molecular pathway called mTOR that is a key regulator of cell growth. PTEN activity is low early during development, allowing . PTEN then turns on when growth is completed, inhibiting mTOR and precluding any ability to regenerate.

Trying to find a way to restore early-developmental-stage cell growth in injured tissue, Zhigang He, a senior neurology researcher at Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, first showed in a 2008 study that blocking PTEN in mice enabled the regeneration of connections from the eye to the brain after optic nerve damage.

He then partnered with Oswald Steward of UCI and Binhai Zheng of UCSD to see if the same approach could promote nerve regeneration in injured sites. Results of their study appear online in .

"Until now, such robust nerve regeneration has been impossible in the spinal cord," said Steward, anatomy & neurobiology professor and director of the Reeve-Irvine Research Center at UCI. "Paralysis and loss of function from spinal cord injury has been considered untreatable, but our discovery points the way toward a potential therapy to induce regeneration of following spinal cord injury in people."

According to Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation data, about 2 percent of Americans have some form of paralysis resulting from spinal cord injury, which is due primarily to the interruption of connections between the brain and spinal cord.

An injury the size of a grape can lead to complete loss of function below the level of injury. For example, an injury to the neck can cause paralysis of arms and legs, loss of ability to feel below the shoulders, inability to control the bladder and bowel, loss of sexual function, and secondary health risks including susceptibility to urinary tract infections, pressure sores and blood clots due to an inability to move the legs.

"These devastating consequences occur even though the spinal cord below the level of injury is intact," Steward noted. "All these lost functions could be restored if we could find a way to regenerate the connections that were damaged."

He and his colleagues are now studying whether the PTEN-deletion treatment leads to actual restoration of motor function in mice with spinal cord injury. Further research will explore the optimal timeframe and drug-delivery system for the therapy.

Explore further: Know the brain, and its axons, by the clothes they wear

Provided by University of California - Irvine

5 /5 (36 votes)

Related Stories

Researchers regenerate axons necessary for voluntary movement

Apr 06, 2009

For the first time, researchers have clearly shown regeneration of a critical type of nerve fiber that travels between the brain and the spinal cord and which is required for voluntary movement. The regeneration was accomplished ...

Promising new nanotechnology for spinal cord injury

Apr 02, 2008

A spinal cord injury often leads to permanent paralysis and loss of sensation below the site of the injury because the damaged nerve fibers can't regenerate. The nerve fibers or axons have the capacity to grow again, but ...

Stem cells used to reverse paralysis in animals

Jan 28, 2009

A new study has found that transplantation of stem cells from the lining of the spinal cord, called ependymal stem cells, reverses paralysis associated with spinal cord injuries in laboratory tests. The findings show that ...

Recommended for you

Know the brain, and its axons, by the clothes they wear

Apr 18, 2014

(Medical Xpress)—It is widely know that the grey matter of the brain is grey because it is dense with cell bodies and capillaries. The white matter is almost entirely composed of lipid-based myelin, but ...

Turning off depression in the brain

Apr 17, 2014

Scientists have traced vulnerability to depression-like behaviors in mice to out-of-balance electrical activity inside neurons of the brain's reward circuit and experimentally reversed it – but there's ...

Rapid whole-brain imaging with single cell resolution

Apr 17, 2014

A major challenge of systems biology is understanding how phenomena at the cellular scale correlate with activity at the organism level. A concerted effort has been made especially in the brain, as scientists are aiming to ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DaveGee
5 / 5 (6) Aug 08, 2010
It must be so very frustrating to people suffering with similar conditions... On one hand YES this is such a promising treatment yet at the same time this will continue to be relegated to the lab for a few more years and perhaps a human test being made public every once and again. Hopefully the procedure gets replicated in other countries where the path to being approved for human use is much quicker than here in the US.

Now I'm not going to debate on the speed at which medical approvals happen here in the US is good or bad but being someone who has a stage IVb cancer, I hope you can excuse me for leaning toward the faster is better mindset. I've been living on borrowed time for the past few years so that clearly has an influence on me.
zz6549
4.4 / 5 (5) Aug 08, 2010
I completely agree with you. The medical approval procedure in America is far behind the pace of innovation. It is unfortunate this is the case in the country that does the majority of the world's medical research.

I think that Asian countries will be the best bet for access to "unproven" medical procedures, as it's unlikely the FDA will make it any easier in the near future. India and China may not be known for their healthcare, but I think that will change in the coming decade.
Foundation
5 / 5 (5) Aug 08, 2010
But those Asian countries may also become known for the next Thalidomide. Looser regulations can cut both ways unfortunately.

I'm all for experimental and cutting edge medicine, but only if the patient fully understands that experimental medicine is potentially lethal. If you're going to die of cancer, or stuck in a wheelchair for the rest of your life, sure. If you're experiencing morning sickness (as was the case of Thalidomide) you should take something else and/or slug it out until the FDA is through with it.
DaveGee
5 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2010
Yep we all seem to be on the same page. In short these new medical procedures should have a faster track then they do now and without enormous amounts of red tape current fact tracking approvals have today. At this stage in my life ... I wouldn't think twice about undergoing a procedure that might only have a 20% chance of working ... Provided the researchers would learn from my participation even if the worst outcome came true.

A good example of this is the treatment of macular degeneration... My wifes dad is rapidly going blind and with little hope of recovery. Now just yesterday I learned that doctors in Germany have a treatment that they've been using for well over a year now. The treatment is quite simple and involves stem cells extracted from the patients own bone. It basically stops any further progression in both wet & dry versions of the condition. It seems to have some ability to reverse the damage but it seems to be limited. Here in the US citizens are still going blind.
fixer
5 / 5 (1) Aug 09, 2010
@DaveGee
I have posted this link several times, and this is available now.
http://www.physor...379.html
If your local chemist doesn't stock it try here.
http://www.myvita...cap.html

Most people read the posts but never bother to go any further, I did and am alive because of this product.
kshultz222_yahoo_com
3.5 / 5 (2) Aug 09, 2010
Approval time should be related to the severity of the illness and chances for making things worse. Cancer and paralysis treatments should be on really fast tracks; pimples and gray hair should be treated differently. Why is so hard to figure out???
Three and five year waits (or more) for terminally ill patients is ridiculous.
As long as it is impossible to sue someone if you have signed off on the dangers, then there should be little to no liability issues for the researchers.
gopher65
4.8 / 5 (4) Aug 09, 2010
The problem is that it *isn't* impossible to sue the research company even if you've signed off on the dangers. It isn't uncommon for the families of test subjects to sue the companies preforming the tests, despite the fact that the patients knew darned well that it was a highly experimental treatment with potentially lethal consequences (...which covers every experimental treatment, pretty much).

Until the "sue their pants off because I spilt hot coffee on myself" culture in the USA goes away, companies and government labs will continue to take the cautious path with drug development.
DaveGee
not rated yet Aug 09, 2010
@DaveGee
I have posted this link several times, and this is available now.
Most people read the posts but never bother to go any further, I did and am alive because of this product.


Wow, thanks... That's something I've gotta look into... I've got stage IVb lung cancer with no tumors... You'd think that was a good thing until you leered the cancer has taken over several lymph nodes. Between the two... Trust me you'd rather have a tumor somwere far away from your lymphatic system... It's like a super highway to everywhere else and let's the cancer pop up just about anywhere. Thanks again for that link... Gotta see what cancers it does well with.
Modernmystic
2.5 / 5 (2) Aug 12, 2010
The FDA kept beta blockers off the US market for 10 years despite wide sucess in Europe. Beta blockers save about 10,000 lives a year.

The headline when they did approve the drug was "FDA approves new wonder drug to save an estimated 10,000 lives a year".

It wasn't "The FDA killed 100,000 before finally approving a drug that's worked for 10 years in the market".

More news stories

Filipino tests negative for Middle East virus

A Filipino nurse who tested positive for the Middle East virus has been found free of infection in a subsequent examination after he returned home, Philippine health officials said Saturday.

Study says we're over the hill at 24

(Medical Xpress)—It's a hard pill to swallow, but if you're over 24 years of age you've already reached your peak in terms of your cognitive motor performance, according to a new Simon Fraser University study.

NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs

Robonaut, the first out-of-this-world humanoid, is finally getting its space legs. For three years, Robonaut has had to manage from the waist up. This new pair of legs means the experimental robot—now stuck ...

Ex-Apple chief plans mobile phone for India

Former Apple chief executive John Sculley, whose marketing skills helped bring the personal computer to desktops worldwide, says he plans to launch a mobile phone in India to exploit its still largely untapped ...

Egypt archaeologists find ancient writer's tomb

Egypt's minister of antiquities says a team of Spanish archaeologists has discovered two tombs in the southern part of the country, one of them belonging to a writer and containing a trove of artifacts including reed pens ...

Airbnb rental site raises $450 mn

Online lodging listings website Airbnb inked a $450 million funding deal with investors led by TPG, a source close to the matter said Friday.