Human embryonic stem cells and reprogrammed cells virtually identical

Aug 05, 2010

Human embryonic stem (ES) cells and adult cells reprogrammed to an embryonic stem cell-like state—so-called induced pluripotent stem or iPS cells—exhibit very few differences in their gene expression signatures and are nearly indistinguishable in their chromatin state, according to Whitehead Institute researchers.

Their results are published in the August 6 issue of Cell Stem Cell.

iPS cells are made by introducing three key genes into . These reprogramming factors push the cells from a mature state to a more flexible embryonic stem cell-like state. Like ES cells, iPS cells can then, in theory, be coaxed to mature into almost any type of cell in the body. Unlike ES cells, iPS cells taken from a patient are not likely to be rejected by that patient's . This difference overcomes a major hurdle in regenerative medicine.

"Billions of dollars have been invested in the idea that we will use ES cells at some point in the future as therapeutic or regenerative agents, but for ethical and practical issues, this may not be possible," says Garrett Frampton, a co-first author on the Cell Stem Cell paper and a graduate student in the lab of Whitehead Member Richard Young. "But if they work out therapies with ES cells, and iPS cells are equivalent to ES cells, then the idea is that those therapies could be used with iPS cells as well. Whereas if iPS cells are different from ES cells, then who knows if you can use iPS cells for therapy?"

Since iPS cells were first developed in 2006, the similarities and differences between ES and iPS cells have been hotly debated in the scientific community. Thus far, researchers have gauged the cells' equivalence by determining whether the cells express the same , but such studies have yielded mixed results.

In revisiting the question of the cells' equivalence, Frampton and co-first author Matthew Guenther, who is a scientist in the Young lab, analyzed patterns and the cells' chromatin structure. Chromatin is the packaging of DNA around a protein scaffold. Variations in chromatin "packaging" can themselves alter gene expression, yet Guenther and Frampton found that human iPS and ES cells to be almost identical in both gene expression and chromatin structure.

"At this stage, we can't yet prove that they are absolutely identical, but the available technology doesn't reveal differences," says Young, who is also a biology professor at MIT. "It does mean that iPS cells could be useful as personal ES cells in the future."

Some earlier studies have indicated that iPS and ES cells are dissimilar enough to be classified as different cell types. To see why the results differed so strikingly from theirs, Guenther and Frampton reanalyzed those studies' data. They concluded that the differences noted in other studies were not consistent between different laboratories and thus were not likely to be a result of fundamental differences between the cell types.

"The key question is, are any of these differences functionally relevant? Do they change how a cell matures or not?" says Whitehead Member Rudolf Jaenisch, whose lab worked closely with Guenther and Frampton. "The earlier documented differences were more noise than anything. But other tests may give you a different answer. So it is still an open question, something that the field will continue to struggle with and have to decide."

Guenther agrees.

"Our paper addresses the ground state of iPS and in a laboratory setting," he says. "But we don't know for a fact that they won't behave differently when they mature into various cell types or tissues. That's the next step."

Explore further: Life's extremists may be an untapped source of antibacterial drugs

More information: "Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression Programs of Human Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells", Cell Stem Cell, August 6, 2010

Related Stories

Recipe for cell reprogramming adds protein

Aug 06, 2008

A drug-like molecule called Wnt can be substituted for the cancer gene c-Myc, one of four genes added to adult cells to reprogram them to an embryonic-stem-cell-like state, according to Whitehead researchers. Researchers ...

Recommended for you

Cohesin molecule safeguards cell division

Nov 21, 2014

The cohesin molecule ensures the proper distribution of DNA during cell division. Scientists at the Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP) in Vienna can now prove the concept of its carabiner-like ...

Nail stem cells prove more versatile than press ons

Nov 21, 2014

There are plenty of body parts that don't grow back when you lose them. Nails are an exception, and a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) reveals some of the r ...

Scientists develop 3-D model of regulator protein bax

Nov 21, 2014

Scientists at Freie Universität Berlin, the University of Tubingen, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH) provide a new 3D model of the protein Bax, a key regulator of cell death. When active, Bax ...

Researchers unwind the mysteries of the cellular clock

Nov 20, 2014

Human existence is basically circadian. Most of us wake in the morning, sleep in the evening, and eat in between. Body temperature, metabolism, and hormone levels all fluctuate throughout the day, and it ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

joefarah
3 / 5 (2) Aug 05, 2010
So why do we continue controversial and costly ES cell research (which I believe is morally wrong when the ES cell is not taken from the placenta)?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.