BP 'plugs' Gulf of Mexico oil spill (Update)

Aug 04, 2010 by Matt Davis
Image from a live BP video feed shows a view from a submersible while checking the well head in the Gulf of Mexico. A "static kill" procedure to permanently plug the runaway oil well has achieved the "desired outcome," BP said Wednesday

BP said Wednesday that it had succeeded in plugging a ruptured oil well in the Gulf of Mexico, signalling an end to the worst spill in the United States' history.

The eight-hour "static kill" procedure, which involved pumping heavy drilling fluid known in the industry as mud into the busted well, had gone as planned although the situation would continue to be monitored.

"The well pressure is now being controlled by the hydrostatic pressure of the drilling mud, the desired outcome of the static kill procedure," the British company said in a statement.

The apparent breakthrough came 106 days after a devastating explosion aboard the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig on April 20 killed 11 workers and unleashed the biggest oil spill in history.

The 4.9 million barrel leak threatened the fish and wildlife-rich US Gulf coast with environmental ruin and plunged residents of coastal communities into months of anguish over their livelihoods and the region's future.

BP also emerged from the ordeal many billions of dollars poorer and with its reputation tarnished by a succession of failures to stop the leak and public relations gaffes by ousted CEO Tony Hayward.

In its statement, BP said it could yet pump more mud into the well in order to push leaking crude oil back into its source rock.

"The well is now being monitored, per the procedure, to ensure the well remains static," it said. "Further pumping of mud may or may not be required depending on the results observed during monitoring."

It said it would continue to work with the Obama administration's pointman Thad Allen "to determine the next course of action, which includes assessing whether to inject cement into the well via the same route."

Officials had said that complications could arise if the well's casing was found to have leaks, in which case they might have to hold off sealing it with cement until a relief well is complete.

BP said that in any event it will continue to drill a relief well to cut off and seal the well from the bottom, ensuring that the plug is final.

Senior vice president Kent Wells said Tuesday he was encouraged by tests performed before mud was pumped in, which showed the oil could be subdued.

Allen, the Coast Guard admiral who has overseen the government's response to the spill, was emphatic that the static kill "will increase the probability that the relief well will work."

In the long run, "drilling into the annulus and into the casing pipe from below, filling that with mud and then filling that with cement is the only solution to the end of this," he told reporters Tuesday.

The extent of the spill was confirmed when US government experts on Monday announced that the oil had been pouring out at a rate of 62,000 barrels a day -- more than 12 times faster than BP originally admitted.

This was also higher than any previous official estimate, and meant 4.9 million barrels of crude -- more than 205 million gallons -- spewed into the Gulf in the 87 days it took to cap it, making it the biggest maritime spill ever.

If BP is found guilty of negligence, the flow rate means it could face up to 17.6 billion dollars in fines. The firm has also set up a 20 billion dollar fund to pay claims from individuals and businesses hit by the disaster.

In a related development, BP was hit by a 10-billion dollar class action lawsuit for an alleged leak of toxic chemicals from its Texas City, Texas refinery, Britain's Telegraph newspaper reported.

The full economic and environmental cost will not be clear for some time, but a hint of what is to come appeared in a report by researchers at the National Center for Disaster Preparedness (NCDP) at Columbia University.

Of 1,200 coastal Gulf coast residents the researchers surveyed last month, 40 percent said they had been directly exposed to the spill, a third said it had affected their children, and 20 percent said it had hit their wallets.

Parents reported that their children had developed mental, behavioral or physical problems -- everything from respiratory problems and rashes to feelings of sadness or nervousness, difficulty socializing with other children, or trouble getting to sleep.

One in five residents told the Columbia researchers that their household income had fallen, with poor residents -- those who earned less than 25,000 dollars a year -- feeling the pinch more than the better-off.

Explore further: Climate change and air pollution will combine to curb food supplies

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Storm threatens BP efforts to plug Gulf well

Jul 22, 2010

The threat of a new tropical storm forced crews to make preparations to protect the damaged Gulf of Mexico oil well, which could delay plans to permanently seal the leak that led to the environmental disaster.

Engineers prepare to seal ruptured oil well

Jul 31, 2010

Engineers Saturday readied a plan to permanently seal a damaged Gulf of Mexico well, despite delays to the process caused by debris left behind by a recent tropical storm.

Recommended for you

Pacific summit to urge action on climate change

2 hours ago

Pacific island leaders will renew calls for meaningful action on climate change at a regional summit opening in Palau on Tuesday, amid fears rising seas will swamp their low-lying nations.

US plans widespread seismic testing of sea floor

Jul 26, 2014

(AP)—The U.S. government is planning to use sound blasting to conduct research on the ocean floor along most of the East Coast, using technology similar to that which led to a court battle by environmentalists in New Jersey.

Fire ecology manipulation by California native cultures

Jul 26, 2014

Before the colonial era, 100,000s of people lived on the land now called California, and many of their cultures manipulated fire to control the availability of plants they used for food, fuel, tools, and ritual. Contemporary ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gabrielmurphy
Aug 04, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
LordOfRuin
not rated yet Aug 04, 2010
And so the blame and claim process begins. Lot's of people looking to profit from this.

Where the hell is Haliburton and Transocean in all this? Sitting pretty somewhere I bet. Well, I suppose Haliburton have half of the US government in their pocket, so they're pretty safe.

Is that too cynical?
seppuku
not rated yet Aug 04, 2010
Didn't anybody noticed the subtle PR trick during this entire crisis? "worst spill in the United States' history".

Somebody clearly doesn't want the world to know that this was in fact (considering the overall impact) the "WORLD'S BIGGEST oil spill".
Shootist
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 04, 2010
Didn't anybody noticed the subtle PR trick during this entire crisis? "worst spill in the United States' history".

Somebody clearly doesn't want the world to know that this was in fact (considering the overall impact) the "WORLD'S BIGGEST oil spill".


Wrong. The worse spill in American history was an order of magnitude larger. 470 odd oil tankers sunk in the North Atlantic in 1942-1943.

This spill was never as bad as the administration and press led us to believe. "Never waste a crisis", being the operative phrase.
extremity
3 / 5 (2) Aug 04, 2010
Didn't anybody noticed the subtle PR trick during this entire crisis? "worst spill in the United States' history".

Somebody clearly doesn't want the world to know that this was in fact (considering the overall impact) the "WORLD'S BIGGEST oil spill".


You need to do a little research before claiming something is the "World's Biggest" It might be the biggest in the last couple of years, but there are several oil spills through-out the last century that have been far worse than this one that happened in more populated areas. It goes to show is that even the worse disasters are quickly forgotten once things get swept under the carpet and people don't see it plastered all over the news and media. It also shows that how over-hyped people get to media and how "Out of sight, out of mind" we are. I'm not downplaying that this was a massive environmental disaster in any way. But I am saying there have been worse disasters and we've gotten over those. We'll get over this one too.