Relationships improve your odds of survival by 50 percent

Jul 27, 2010

A new Brigham Young University study adds our social relationships to the "short list" of factors that predict a person's odds of living or dying.

In the journal , BYU professors Julianne Holt-Lunstad and Timothy Smith report that - friends, family, neighbors or colleagues - improve our odds of survival by 50 percent. Here is how low compares to more well-known risk factors:

  • Equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day
  • Equivalent to being an alcoholic
  • More harmful than not exercising
  • Twice as harmful as obesity
"The idea that a lack of is a risk factor for death is still not widely recognized by health organizations and the public," write the PLoS Medicine editors in a summary of the BYU study and why it was done.

The researchers analyzed data from 148 previously published longitudinal studies that measured frequency of human interaction and tracked for a period of seven and a half years on average. Because information on quality was unavailable, the 50 percent increased odds of survival may underestimate the benefit of healthy relationships.

"The data simply show whether they were integrated in a social network," Holt-Lunstad said. "That means the effects of negative relationships are lumped in there with the positive ones. They are all averaged together."

Holt-Lunstad said there are many pathways through which friends and family influence health for the better, ranging from a calming touch to finding meaning in life.

"When someone is connected to a group and feels responsibility for other people, that sense of purpose and meaning translates to taking better care of themselves and taking fewer risks," Holt-Lunstad said.

In examining the data, Smith took a careful look at whether the results were driven primarily by people helping each other prolong their golden years.

"This effect is not isolated to older adults," Smith said. "Relationships provide a level of protection across all ages."

Smith said that modern conveniences and technology can lead some people to think that social networks aren't necessary.

"We take relationships for granted as humans - we're like fish that don't notice the water," Smith said. "That constant interaction is not only beneficial psychologically but directly to our physical health."

Explore further: New research identifies risks, interventions for children's GI health

More information: Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB (2010) Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review. PLoS Med 7(7): e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316

Related Stories

Economist shows good fences do make good neighbors

Nov 08, 2006

A new study led by a UC Irvine economist debunks a popular argument against urban sprawl -- that living farther from neighbors decreases social interaction. In fact, the data shows that suburban living is better for one's ...

Loneliness, Poor Health Appear to be Linked

Jun 18, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Two UA studies have found that hoarding friends doesn't necessarily diminish forlorn feelings and that loneliness is a matter of perception.

Recommended for you

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

zevkirsh
5 / 5 (2) Jul 27, 2010
brigham young? yea i'm going to believe the mormons. no thank you.
nevdka
5 / 5 (3) Jul 28, 2010
I thought the probability of death was 1 no matter what you do...
adaptation
not rated yet Jul 28, 2010
This "study" doesn't show anything other than correlation. There is no indication (from this evidence) that relationships have any causal effect on health.

People with fewer social interactions might have high stress jobs that require them to work long hours. They might be depressed, which may have some influence on mortality. There are countless reasons why these people might not have a large social network that could also affect their health. I don't see any of them accounted for here.

The implication of the article seems to be that if you run out and get some friends, you'll live longer, but they have no evidence to support it.

Where's the science?
david13579
not rated yet Jul 28, 2010
I don't know about this but I used to be a loner and was always sad but new friends have made my life better and I feel better. The more friends I get the better I feel.
Arkaleus
not rated yet Jul 28, 2010
What kind of relationships are better? Master to Slave? Authority to Subject? Jailer to Inmate? Are equal relationships better than subjugation?
Joshua_Jacobsen
not rated yet Jul 29, 2010
It seems likely that people with risky lifestyles and people who are already sick have a harder time forming meaningful relationships than healthy people with better lifestyles. correlation != causation.

More news stories

Heat-related deaths in Manhattan projected to rise

Residents of Manhattan will not just sweat harder from rising temperatures in the future, says a new study; many may die. Researchers say deaths linked to warming climate may rise some 20 percent by the 2020s, ...

Honeybees trained in Croatia to find land mines

(AP)—Mirjana Filipovic is still haunted by the land mine blast that killed her boyfriend and blew off her left leg while on a fishing trip nearly a decade ago. It happened in a field that was supposedly ...

Mice, gerbils perish in Russia space flight

A number of mice and eight gerbils sent into space in a Russian capsule destined to find out how well organisms can withstand extended flights perished during their journey, scientists said Sunday as the ...