How should referees use technology in football?

Jul 10, 2010
How should referees use technology in football?

(PhysOrg.com) -- As World Cup 2010 looks set to be the tipping point for the use of technology in football a Cardiff University expert argues it’s justice not accuracy that’s at stake.

Professor Harry Collins, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, looks at the impact of technology on sports umpiring and refereeing in a forthcoming paper in The Journal of the Philosophy of Sport.

Professor Collins argues that the introduction of new technology should be done in such a way as to increase the justice of decisions and that this is best done with a restrained use of new technology. He writes that some sports decision aids can be less accurate than they appear, leading to false transparency.

Professor Collins said: “In the case of the 2010 World Cup it's especially important to disentangle the question of exactness and the question of justice. The increasingly vocal calls for the introduction of 'goal-line technology' often confuse the two.

“To get rid of transparent injustice all that is necessary is to give referees direct or indirect access to the television replays that the viewer sees and allow them to use these in their decision-making so as to avoid obvious mistakes. There is no need to try to find technology that will define the 'exact' position of the ball. In rare cases television replays will not be able to determine whether the whole of the ball crossed the line or not - advanced technology could resolve some but not all of such cases but there is no need for it. In such cases, referees, using TV replays, can be seen to be doing their best, especially if backed up with a 'benefit of the doubt' rule such as, 'if in irresolvable doubt, it is a goal'.”

Professor Collins concludes that should be used to avoid errors which are obvious to all; but argues that the ’s judgement must remain paramount.

Previous research by Professor Collins and colleagues in the School of Social Sciences has questioned the accuracy of Hawk-Eye and similar line-calling technologies arguing such devices could cause viewers to overestimate the ability of technological devices to resolve disagreements.

Explore further: Activists urge EU to scrap science advisor job

More information: Read Professor Collins' research paper

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Football lags other sports on technology

Jun 28, 2010

High profile sports like rugby, tennis, cricket and basketball have seamlessly embraced technology to aid referees and linesmen, so why doesn't football?

Anger as FIFA rejects goal-line technology

Mar 07, 2010

The International Football Association Board has rejected the introduction of goal-line technology, sparking an angry reaction from some football managers.

Faking it for physicists

Jul 06, 2006

In a "faking it" style test, a social scientist has fooled a panel of physicist judges into believing he was an experienced gravitational wave physicist.

On demand FB cell phone replays created

Sep 27, 2007

People attending Purdue University home football games this fall might be the first U.S. college fans able to call up instant replays on their cell phones.

Recommended for you

What I learned from debating science with trolls

15 hours ago

I often like to discuss science online and I'm also rather partial to topics that promote lively discussion, such as climate change, crime statistics and (perhaps surprisingly) the big bang. This inevitably ...

Activists urge EU to scrap science advisor job

Aug 19, 2014

Nine major charities urged the European Commission on Tuesday to scrap a science advisor position it says puts too much power over sensitive policy into the hands of one person.

More to a skilled ear in music

Aug 15, 2014

The first pilot study in Australia to give musicians the skills and training to critically assess music by what they hear rather than what they see begins this month at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music.The study aims to ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DeltaVee
not rated yet Jul 10, 2010
The typical argument against using replays is that the play would be interrupted (assuming there is stoppage for a review). I would propose that they continue playing while some "replay referees" review the video, and then make an announcement during the next throw in or free kick. That way, the game is not interrupted, and a goal or offside offense could be overruled appropriately.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Jul 11, 2010
Could it be that the - unfair - denial of a goal to the ENGLISH team in the match against germany has anything to do with an ENGLISH scientists claiming "this is the tipping point" and that there are "increasing vocal calls" for this type of electronic aids.

Surely not...