BP to place new containment cap on oil spill

Jul 10, 2010 by Mira Oberman
A worker cleans oily globs that washed ashore in Waveland, Mississippi. nergy giant BP was expected to begin a new effort Saturday to contain a Gulf of Mexico oil spill by placing a better cap over the gushing well in hopes to stop the flow of oil completely.

Energy giant BP was expected to begin a new effort Saturday to contain a Gulf of Mexico oil spill by placing a better cap over the gushing well in hopes to stop the flow of oil completely.

Admiral Thad Allen, who oversees the government's spill response, said late Friday he had approved the plan to simultaneously install the Helix Producer and "capping stack" containment mechanisms over the well.

However, the operation will require temporary suspension of the current top hat containment system. That means about 15,000 barrels of oil a day that had been collected through the old capping system will spew directly into the Gulf until the new cap is in place.

"I validated this plan because the capacity for oil containment when these installations are complete will be far greater than the capabilities we have achieved using current systems," Allen explained.

He said favorable weather was expected in the spill area over the coming days, which "will provide the working conditions necessary for these transitions to be successfully completed without delays."

The transition to this new containment infrastructure could begin in the next days but will take seven to 10 days to complete, the admiral said.

If successful, the new cap could capture all of the crude spilling into the Gulf and allow it to be siphoned up to container vessels on the surface, in effect halting the devastating spill of crude into the sea that has imperiled fragile coastlines and wildlife across the Gulf Coast.

The operation is the latest attempt to contain the spill that was sparked by the April 20 explosion aboard the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon oil rig.

BP said meanwhile in a letter to Allen that it wants to move forward with its plan.

Managing Director Bob Dudley said the company wanted to take advantage of forecast good weather to place a more effective cap over the leak and hook up the new containment ship, the Helix Producer.

Under a timeline released by BP, the relief well that would permanently seal the leak would be completed by August 13.

Earlier, Allen said he was optimistic about a fix soon for the environmental disaster.

"We have a significant chance to dramatically reduce the oil that's being released into the environment and maybe shut the well in altogether in the next week," he told CNN Friday.

The White House has pushed for the new containment device because its superior seal is expected to capture the entire leak and is better equipped to deal with a hurricane threat in the storm-prone Gulf.

Crews have already seen clean-up and containment operations hampered by bad weather and with an active storm season predicted, officials are busy developing contingencies.

The new system will use "quick-disconnect couplings" allowing container ships to shut down operations and exit the area quickly in the face of a hurricane, Allen said.

The news comes just after President Barack Obama's administration lost a bid to lift a stay of its six-month freeze on deepwater drilling in the Gulf.

Current government estimates of the spill range from between 35,000 to 60,000 barrels a day, based on interpretation of a live video feed of the leak.

An estimated two to four million barrels of oil have gushed into the Gulf waters since the spill began, and a permanent solution is not expected until one of two relief wells is completed.

Oil has now washed up on beaches in all five Gulf states -- Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida -- forcing the closure of fishing grounds and threatening scores of coastal communities with financial ruin.

The spill prompted the Obama administration to order a moratorium on deepwater drilling, but the freeze was overturned by a federal court last month and an appeals court upheld that ruling on Thursday.

The government "made no showing that there is any likelihood that drilling activities will be resumed pending appeal," the court said.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has said he will soon issue a new order to block deepwater drilling, regardless of how the court ruled, and that companies have not resumed drilling due to the legal uncertainties.

Explore further: Conservation scientists asking wrong questions on climate change impacts on wildlife

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

BP cuts off broken oil pipe with giant shears

Jun 03, 2010

BP on Thursday successfully cut off a fractured oil pipe using giant shears, pressing ahead with its latest bid to seal the Gulf of Mexico leak as President Barack Obama announced a third trip to the region.

BP removes oil cap after submarine crash

Jun 23, 2010

Oil gushed unchecked Wednesday from the leaking well in the Gulf of Mexico after BP's containment system was removed for repairs following a submarine crash, US officials said.

US oil spill clean-up resumes after storm

Jul 04, 2010

Clean-up work gathered speed in some areas of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill Sunday, but heavy swells kept many boats docked, halting efforts to fight the ecological disaster.

BP sucking up half of oil leaking from Gulf well

Jun 07, 2010

Engineers hoped Monday to make more headway in their bid to contain a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico after energy giant BP announced it was now capturing about half of the oil gushing from its ruptured ...

Obama vows help as BP sees oil spill progress

Jun 05, 2010

US President Barack Obama promised on Saturday to use "every resource" to help those affected by the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, as Americans awaited news of BP's latest containment effort.

BP oil spill costs soar above 3 billion dollars

Jul 05, 2010

BP's costs over the Gulf of Mexico oil spill soared Monday above three billion dollars, while a giant Taiwanese ship provided hope of revolutionizing on-sea skimming operations.

Recommended for you

Big data confirms climate extremes are here to stay

22 hours ago

In a paper published online today in the journal Scientific Reports, published by Nature, Northeastern researchers Evan Kodra and Auroop Ganguly found that while global temperature is indeed increasing, so too is the variab ...

Peru's carbon quantified: Economic and conservation boon

22 hours ago

Today scientists unveiled the first high-resolution map of the carbon stocks stored on land throughout the entire country of PerĂº. The new and improved methodology used to make the map marks a sea change ...

How might climate change affect our food supply?

23 hours ago

It's no easy question to answer, but prudence demands that we try. Thus, Microsoft and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) have teamed up to tackle "food resilience," one of several themes ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Bob_Kob
1 / 5 (6) Jul 10, 2010
We should just put a nuclear warhead down it.
DickWilhelm
5 / 5 (7) Jul 10, 2010
I sure wish we could nuke the comments section of this thread and cap future comments :/
stealthc
1.4 / 5 (9) Jul 10, 2010
why cuz some of us know what's really going on and you don't want the truth to come out? This spill is intentional, it is how one declares war against the USA, or rather, the world. It is the transnational corporations versus the people, using puppet governments as their tools.
Icester
3 / 5 (2) Jul 10, 2010
What upsets me almost as much as the spill is the lack of checks and balances on this administration. Twice already courts have ruled that the moratorium imposed by the Obama administration was wrong. Now, "Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has said he will soon issue a new order to block deepwater drilling, regardless of how the court ruled"

No checks, No balances.

Call it what you want, but it's certainly not what our Constitution intended.
DickWilhelm
5 / 5 (2) Jul 11, 2010
@stealthc: I doubt that BP, a corporation that has a track record of maximizing profits at all cost, is intentionally hemorrhaging billions of dollars in a silent war against the US Government. It makes no sense and it is clear you haven't applied any logic to your theory.

@Icester: There is nothing in the constitution that guarantees a corporation unrestrained access to public land, nor has any federal court ruled that such a moratorium is unconstitutional. The only judge that made a decision to that effect has a clear conflict of interest, and only represent state government. There are still check and balances, and there is a reason there has been no serious challenge to the moratorium. This time is needed to review and revise regulations to ensure that if something of this magnitude occurs again there is a system in place to quickly and adequately deal with it.

HealingMindN
not rated yet Jul 12, 2010
Oh, that all sounds great for BP/WH, wonderful. Can someone please tell us what we're supposed to do when hurricanes pick up/atomize corexit and aliphatic hydrocarbons and dump it on our heads and in our fresh water inland?

Why isn't Physorg interviewing any experts on these life threatening issues? If Physorg gets any info, it should be from scientists.

Why hasn't the CDC issued any health hazard warnings? Surely, this is a bigger immediate threat than any "flu pandemic."

Why do we only get to hear what BP stooges have to say about this? I can get this kind of info from any mainstream news outlet.

(BTW: That tom, dick, and harry clean up crew should be wearing gas masks, but BP fires anyone who does.)
Ethelred
not rated yet Jul 13, 2010
Three spammers on one thread.

Is that a record?

REPORT them and the IModerators will actually do something about them. Eventually.

Ethelred
Ethelred
not rated yet Jul 13, 2010
Two spammers down and one to go.

Ethelred