Study: Consumers, Marketers Differ on Electronic Privacy

Jul 09, 2010

A new study by researchers at the University of Massachusetts Amherst shows that consumers and marketers have different expectations for privacy boundaries when new technology is used, and consumers most often prefer an opt-in system for revealing personal information. The study was conducted by George Milne, associate professor of marketing at the Isenberg School of Management, and Shalini Bahl, founder of iAM Business Consulting. It was published in the Journal of Public Policy and Marketing.

This research is the first to directly compare consumer and marketer expectations for privacy boundaries that regulate access to consumer information, Milne says. Overall, when it comes to about personal information, “Consumers clearly wanted more restriction than the marketers wanted.” He also says many consumers don’t understand many of the tools used by marketers and other businesses and often are unaware of the amount of detailed information that is already being gathered about them and their buying and web-browsing habits.

The study looked at the use of eight new technologies: cookies, RFID, text messaging, pop-up ads, telemarketing, SPAM, and loyalty cards. The researchers asked marketing managers and consumers about their views on the use of these tools. Consumers were broken down into three distinct groups, those who were very permissive regarding privacy, those who wanted some level of control and those who wanted to restrict access, he says.

He says when permission-based privacy boundaries were available, a much higher percentage of consumers chose an opt-in method than marketers. This may be because the opt-in process allows a choice, rather than letting marketers choose what is useful to them. The other choices were notification or an opt-out provision.

Milne says this study only covers a portion of the technologies that can and do gather information about people. New tools such as GPS tracking in cell phones or the increasing use of surveillance cameras add to the mix, he says.

The gap in privacy expectations is occurring at a time when new technological advances for gathering information are outstripping consumer understanding, making privacy protection increasingly difficult, Milne says. Milne also says the issue of management is important because businesses and marketers who violate consumer trust with what are perceived to be intrusive or dishonest practices can quickly lose customers. The study also suggests there may be areas where greater regulation is required to prevent the most intrusive practices.

Explore further: Performance measures for CEOs vary greatly, study finds

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Privacy group files FTC complaint on Google Buzz

Feb 16, 2010

(AP) -- A privacy watchdog group complained to federal regulators on Tuesday about Google's new Buzz social networking service, saying it violates federal consumer protection law.

Web ad group launches privacy education campaign

Dec 03, 2009

(AP) -- A group of leading Internet publishers and digital marketing services on Thursday launched an online campaign to educate consumers about how they are tracked and targeted for pitches on the Web.

Recommended for you

Performance measures for CEOs vary greatly, study finds

2 hours ago

As companies file their annual proxy statements with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this spring, a new study by Rice University and Cornell University shows just how S&P 500 companies have ...

Investment helps keep transport up to speed

6 hours ago

Greater investment in education and training for employees will be required to meet the future needs of the transport and logistics industry, according to recent reports by Monash University researchers.

Sharing = Stealing: Busting a copyright myth

Apr 11, 2014

Consumers copy and share digital files. This has been blamed for a potentially catastrophic decline in certain markets. But why do consumers copy? And is it as economically harmful as often thought?

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Doug_Huffman
not rated yet Jul 10, 2010
If the cohorts' epithets were 'markets' and 'marketeers' would the point be better made?

More news stories

How kids' brain structures grow as memory develops

Our ability to store memories improves during childhood, associated with structural changes in the hippocampus and its connections with prefrontal and parietal cortices. New research from UC Davis is exploring ...

Gate for bacterial toxins found

Prof. Dr. Dr. Klaus Aktories and Dr. Panagiotis Papatheodorou from the Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology of the University of Freiburg have discovered the receptor responsible ...