Recipes for Renegade Planets

Jul 08, 2010 by John Ruley
JArtist's impression of a gas-giant exoplanet in close orbit around its star. Credit: C.Carreau, ESA

Recent discoveries of gas giant planets in unusual orbits challenge the generally accepted theory of planet formation. While these discoveries do not disprove the theory, they have opened our eyes to chaotic solar systems quite unlike our own.

Over the past two hundred years, a standard model emerged to explain how solar systems form. Using our own as a guide, the model explains the existence of a central star (our Sun), an inner system of rocky, “terrestrial” planets, and an outer system of “” planets, all orbiting in nearly the same plane of rotation as the central star.

Recent discoveries of planetary systems around other have challenged this model. These exoplanet discoveries have included gas giant planets in close orbit around their stars, some of which are in radically different planes of rotation from their primary stars.

Deviation from the Model

In the generally accepted model for solar system formation, everything begins with a nebula (or cloud) containing gas and dust. Gravitational attraction causes the cloud to collapse, and if the collapse is less than perfectly symmetric, will lead the cloud to form a nearly flat rotating disk.

The greatest concentration of material collects at the center of the disk, forming a protostar, while protoplanets may form at some distance from the center around areas of higher than average density within the disk. When the protostar eventually collects enough matter, fusion reactions begin and it becomes a young star, heating the inner portion of the disk and vaporizing any gases that may have collected - which naturally explains why planets that form near the star are rocky. At greater distances, gases can remain in icy form and accrete into gas giant planets. The limiting radius that defines the division between the rocky inner planets and outer gas giants is called the “ice line”.

Whether inside or outside the ice line, planets sweep out material within a particular radius of the disk as they orbit the star, and over time bring together whatever dust (and beyond the ice line, gas) are available at that radius. Interaction between the planets and central star eventually put most of the planets in stable, near-circular orbits.

Artist’s impression of a protoplanetary disk, based on observations from NASA’s Spitzer space telescope. Credit: NASA/JPL-CalTech Image

Over the past few years, as exoplanets have been discovered around other stars, we’ve learned that not every solar system follows our recipe. Among the first exoplanet findings were so-called "Hot Jupiter" gas giant planets in close orbit around stars. Then there’s the case of a gas giant planet orbiting a brown dwarf star in a system that hasn’t been around long enough to provide time for the slow accretion of icy particles predicted by the condensation model. In addition, a team of astronomers at the Geneva Observatory recently announced that a majority of 27 “Hot Jupiter” exoplanets are not orbiting in the same plane of rotation of their host star, with six actually in retrograde orbit (opposite the direction of rotation of the host star).

Various schemes have been suggested to explain how a gas giant could form beyond the ice line and then move inward toward the star to become a “hot Jupiter.” One model, called “migration”, involves interaction between a gas giant and a ring of debris in the protoplanetary nebula. Tidal interaction between the gas giant, the primary star and the debris ring could cause the gas giant to slowly spiral in, ultimately arriving in a circular orbit close to the primary star. However, this model would still leave the gas giant orbiting in the plane of the primary star’s rotation. It cannot explain the high inclination and retrograde orbits observed by the Geneva team.

Predicting Backwards Orbits

There is, however, a model that can explain them: In a 2007 paper, Princeton graduate student Daniel Fabrycky, expanding on earlier work by others, showed how they could occur in a binary star system. In this scenario, the primary star is orbited by a distant companion star, and gravitational interaction between a orbiting the primary star and the companion star could destabilize the gas giant’s orbit. This would turn the planet’s circular orbit in the plane of the primary star’s rotation to an eccentric orbit much like that of a comet, tilted significantly to the plane of rotation. Over time, tidal interaction between the gas giant and the primary star circularizes the gas giant’s orbit at its closest distance to the primary star - making it a hot Jupiter. When Fabrycky used computer simulation to model variations on his theory, he found that a significant proportion of the gas giants he modeled wound up in retrograde orbit, opposite the direction of rotation of the primary star - as was subsequently observed by the Geneva group.

Even without a distant binary companion, the orbit of a gas giant could be destabilized if a number of other giant planets in the same system happen to come close together. A 2008 paper by Mikio Nagasawa of the Tokyo Institute of Technology found that interactions between gas giant planets could produce a significant percentage of hot Jupiters, with “a broad range of orbital inclinations (even retrograde ones).”

This artist's conception shows binary-star system HD 113766, where astronomers suspect a rocky Earth-like planet is forming around one of the stars. At approximately 10-16 million years old, astronomers suspect this star is at just the right age for forming rocky planets. The brown ring of material circling closest to the central star depicts a huge belt of dusty material. The rocky material in the belt represents the early stages of planet formation, when dust grains clump together to form rocks, and rocks collide to form even more massive rocky bodies called planetesimals. The white outer ring shows a concentration of icy dust also detected in the system. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

As Fabrycky (who is now a fellow at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics) says, “If you have a planet in a high-inclination, comet-like orbit, the orbital elements couple. That gives you very little angular momentum, and makes it easy to change the orbit into a retrograde motion.”

Fabrycky believes the discovery of hot Jupiter exoplanets in retrograde orbits does not invalidate the standard accretion model, but their existence does “raise a new point of view. In general, solar systems are chaotic and violent,” which means that our own “relatively peaceful” solar system may be something of an exception.

Destabilizing the Possibility for Life

Rory Barnes, a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Astronomy and Astrobiology at the University of Washington, agrees with Fabrycky on that point. “The simple quiescent model we think of with our solar system isn't ubiquitous. There are a lot of things going on that we didn't anticipate.”

Barnes also agrees that a companion star in a binary system could destabilize planetary orbits, but adds, “I have a hard time believing that improbable events like this could lead to a large percentage of planets in retrograde orbits.”

Whatever the mechanism, any process that destabilizes the orbit of a gas giant enough to change the plane of its orbit and move it close to the primary star would spell doom for any terrestrial planet in the same system. Interaction with the gas giant would probably destabilize the orbit of planets in the inner solar system, potentially tossing them out of the solar system entirely and making it unlikely that life as we know it would have time to develop.

Thus, if planetary systems with renegade gas giants turn out to be common, life as we know it may be very rare.

Explore further: Is the universe finite or infinite?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Planetary systems can form around binary stars

Jan 10, 2006

New theoretical work shows that gas-giant planet formation can occur around binary stars in much the same way that it occurs around single stars like the Sun. The work is presented today by Dr. Alan Boss of ...

Turning Planetary Theory Upside Down (w/ Video)

Apr 13, 2010

( -- The discovery of nine new transiting exoplanets is announced today at the RAS National Astronomy Meeting. When these new results were combined with earlier observations of transiting exoplanets ...

Astronomers discover 'tilted planets'

Dec 22, 2009

( -- University of Exeter, UK, research has added to a growing evidence that several giant planets have orbits so tilted that their orbits can be perpendicular or even backwards relative to their ...

Is The Solar System Unique in The Universe?

Aug 03, 2004

On the evidence to date, our solar system could be fundamentally different from the majority of planetary systems around stars because it formed in a different way. If that is the case, Earth-like planets will be very rar ...

Recommended for you

Is the universe finite or infinite?

Mar 27, 2015

Two possiblities exist: either the Universe is finite and has a size, or it's infinite and goes on forever. Both possibilities have mind-bending implications.

'Teapot' nova begins to wane

Mar 27, 2015

A star, or nova, has appeared in the constellation of Sagittarius and, even though it is now waning, it is still bright enough to be visible in the sky over Perth through binoculars or a telescope.

Dark matter is darker than once thought

Mar 27, 2015

This panel of images represents a study of 72 colliding galaxy clusters conducted by a team of astronomers using NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and Hubble Space Telescope. The research sets new limits on ...

Galaxy clusters collide—dark matter still a mystery

Mar 26, 2015

When galaxy clusters collide, their dark matters pass through each other, with very little interaction. Deepening the mystery, a study by scientists at EPFL and the University of Edinburgh challenges the ...

Using 19th century technology to time travel to the stars

Mar 26, 2015

In the late 19th century, astronomers developed the technique of capturing telescopic images of stars and galaxies on glass photographic plates. This allowed them to study the night sky in detail. Over 500,000 ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 08, 2010
Perhaps someone could comment on this... Unless I'm mistaken haven't most of the planetary systems found to date were done so by detecting a stars wobble? If so, then wouldn't it make sence that many of the systems they've found thus far be populated by planets behaving in extreme ways? I'd imagine a more well behaved solar system such as our own wouldn't so easily be detected from distant planets if they tried to examine our sun for a wobble.
5 / 5 (1) Jul 09, 2010
It has been known for a long time that systems with "Hot Jupiters" will not have terrestrial planets in the habitable zone around the star, as the spiralling giant planets would eventually throw away any/ collide with any terrestrial before the system settles down with a "Hot Jupiter".

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.