Organic food can sabotage diet and weight-loss

Jun 30, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- While organic food may contain fewer, if any, pesticides and additives, consumers mistakenly believe it also has fewer calories, say researchers at the University of Michigan.

"As Americans' waistlines have grown, so has their appetite for organic food," said Norbert Schwarz, professor of marketing at the U-M Ross School of Business. "Labeling food as 'organic' entails a claim about its production, but is silent on its calorie content. Nevertheless, people struggling to cut may turn to organics and possibly consume more calories than they otherwise would."

In an article this month in the journal Judgment and Decision Making, Schwarz and U-M colleague Jonathon Schuldt found that Americans believe that organic food contains fewer calories and is, therefore, more appropriate to eat more often than nonorganic food. This is true even when the for organic and conventional foods list the same amount of calories.

The researchers showed more than 100 study participants nutrition information for a regular Oreo cookie and for one that was made with organic flour and sugar. The nutritional label clearly showed a serving size (two cookies) of 160 calories for both Oreos. Nevertheless, 38 percent of the participants thought that the organic cookie had fewer calories than competing brands, whereas only 12 percent did so without the organic claim.

"Presumably, participants inferred that if organic cookies contain 160 calories, then the calorie content of conventional cookies—whatever the precise amount—is likely to be higher," said Schwarz, who also is a professor of psychology and research professor at U-M's Institute for Social Research. "In addition, participants considered it appropriate to consume Oreo cookies more frequently when they were organic than when they were not."

Schuldt and Schwarz also examined whether the influence of organic claims extend beyond judgments about the food itself to judgments about the need for physical exercise—another major factor in America's obesity crisis.

They asked more than 200 study participants whether a female college student trying to lose weight could forgo her daily post-dinner, three-mile run if she ate an organic dessert or a conventional nonorganic dessert (in both cases, a small bowl of ice cream or a chocolate chip cookie) or skipped the dessert altogether.

The researchers found that taking a day off from running seemed less of a problem to study participants if the college student ate the organic dessert or no dessert at all compared to if she ate the conventional dessert.

"Despite the student's goal of losing weight through regular exercise, participants were more lenient toward her forgoing planned exercise when she had chosen organic over conventional dessert," said Schuldt, a doctoral student in psychology at U-M. "Even more surprising was the fact that leniency toward forgoing exercise was slightly greater when the student chose organic dessert than when she chose no dessert at all."

In all, the U-M study shows that the popularity of organic food is not without its down side.

"As millions of Americans attempt to lose weight, eating organic foods—even desserts—may be viewed as a substitute for actual weight-loss-promoting behaviors," Schuldt said. "Our findings suggest that organic claims may not only foster lower calorie estimates and higher consumption intentions, but they may also convey that one has already made progress toward one's weight-loss goal, thus undermining subsequent action."

Explore further: Harmful drinkers would be affected 200 times more than low risk drinkers with an MUP

More information: Research article journal.sjdm.org/10/10509/jdm10509.pdf

Related Stories

Can 'organic' labels backfire?

Apr 28, 2010

Could organic labels lead you to overeat? These labels certainly appear to make people think their organic snack has a lot fewer calories than it really does.

You're likely to order more calories at a 'healthy' restaurant

Aug 29, 2007

An important new study from the Journal of Consumer Research explains the “American obesity paradox”: the parallel rise in obesity rates and the popularity of healthier food. In a series of four studies, the researchers reveal ...

Maintain, don't gain during the holidays

Dec 20, 2007

For many people, the holiday season brings shopping and parties with plenty of delicious food. How do you maintain good eating habits and avoid weight gain when there are so many temptations that can doom even the most disciplined ...

Calorie density key to losing weight

Jun 08, 2007

Eating smart, not eating less, may be the key to losing weight. A year-long clinical trial by Penn State researchers shows that diets focusing on foods that are low in calorie density can promote healthy weight loss while ...

Recommended for you

Patient-centered medical homes reduce costs

12 hours ago

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH), introduced in 2007, is a model of health care that emphasizes personal relationships, team delivery of care, coordination across specialties and care settings, quality ...

New mums still excessively sleepy after four months

13 hours ago

(Medical Xpress)—New mums are being urged to be cautious about returning to work too quickly, after a QUT study found one in two were still excessively sleepy four months after giving birth.

It's time to address the health of men around the world

14 hours ago

All over the world, men die younger than women and do worse on a host of health indicators, yet policy makers rarely focus on this "men's health gap" or adopt programs aimed at addressing it, according to an international ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 30, 2010
Well, holding the belief detailed in the header of this article would make them at best, ignorant, and at worst, stupid -would it not?
As far as I know, the only (even partly) effective cure for ignorance and stupidity is education.

No change in diet is a substitute for that first necessity.
jsa09
not rated yet Jun 30, 2010
This shows the power of marketing. When the marketers get away with a campaign of saying organic is better for you then naturally the normal person thinks that that statement is true in a broad sense.

@caliban yes they are ignorant and many are also borderline stupid that just means more care needs to be taken to get the true message across instead of just getting a message across.

Just using a name like organic that has no meaning to anybody is a sure start to a deliberate attempt to deceive the mind of the ignorant.

Organic - I see a carrot I know it is organic even if it is full of pesticide. But the common person sees a carrot labeled as organic and they think it has to be somehow better than a carrot that is not organic. There is no such thing as a non-organic carrot.
JerryPark
4.5 / 5 (2) Jun 30, 2010
One wonders where these 300 'study participants' were found and how old they were.

In the first instance of 100 participants, 38 were confused. This seems like a large number, but the sample size is so small that the number is probably meaningless.

In the second instance, there were 200 participants but we are not informed of the percentage who were confused.

The study has very little if any validity.
newscience
4.5 / 5 (2) Jun 30, 2010
In 2003 a UC Davis study showed that organic fruits and berries contain up to 58 percent more polyphnols (antioxidents) and higher vitamins then petrochemically farmed. It is true that
an organic Oreo is not much better for you than a non-organic one, any amount of high sugar is not good whether organic or not. The study just showed that many do not understand a traditional balanced diet. It should be noted that pesticide residues in children are a real health risk.
Shootist
1 / 5 (2) Jun 30, 2010
Interesting, that such people are actually intelligent enough to feed themselves.
MarkyMark
not rated yet Jul 01, 2010
Interesting, that such people are actually intelligent enough to feed themselves.

Thats what McDonalds is for ;)