Assisted reproduction boosts risk of deformity: study

Jun 13, 2010

Children born after assisted reproduction face a significantly higher chance of having major birth defects, according to a study released Sunday.

Parents contemplating assisted reproductive technology (ART) should be informed that such treatments carry increased risks, the researchers warned.

The study, the largest of its kind to date, reviewed all the ART births in 33 registered clinics in France from 2003 to 2007, more than 15,000 children in all.

"We found a major congenital malformation in 4.24 percent of the children," said lead researcher Geraldine Viot, a clinical geneticist at the Port Royal maternity hospital in Paris.

The rate of such deformities for the general population is two to three percent.

"This higher rate was due in part to an excess of and malformations of the uro-genital system. This was much more common in boys," she said in a statement.

Among minor malformations, there was a five-fold increase in cases of angioma, the formation of benign tumours on or near the surface of the skin. These occurred twice as frequently in girls than boys.

"We estimate that in France some 200,000 children have been born through ART. A malformation rate of this magnitude is a public health issue," Viot said.

"It is important that all doctors -- and also politicians -- are informed about this," she added.

Parents of children born with malformations were not on average older than other parents in the ART group, so age did not seem to be a factor.

It was unclear to what extent the malformations might be due to genetic variants passed along by the parents, or to the assisted reproduction techniques themselves, the researchers said.

"The origins of the malformation are probably multiple," Viot said. "We need ... to put much more effort into trying to understand which of the procedures involved is implicated in the problem."

The most common techniques are in-vitro fertility (IVF) and a technique called intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Women can also receive hormone therapy to restore or stimulate ovulation.

IVF consists of fertilising a woman's eggs outside the body and then placing them inside the womb, whereas in ICSI a single sperm is injected directly into an egg.

Earlier studies have shown that the most common cause of IVF failure is an abnormal number of chromosomes in the egg.

These so-called "gene imprinting" disorders could also play a role in the higher rate of malformations, Viot suggested.

"At a time when infertility is increasing and more and more couples need to use ART to conceive, it is vitally important that we find out as much as we can about what is causing in these ," Viot said.

A Danish study released in February showed that women who undergo treatment are four times more likely to have a stillbirth compared with those who conceive spontaneously or with a different fertility technique.

Explore further: First successful vaccination against 'mad cow'-like wasting disease in deer

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

ICSI or IVF: Babies born from frozen embryos do just as well

Jun 29, 2009

Analysis of the longest running ICSI programme in the United States has found reassuring evidence that babies born from frozen embryos fertilised via ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) do just as well as those born from ...

The surprising power of the pill

Mar 24, 2008

Women who have tried to conceive using in vitro fertilization (IVF) methods are painfully aware that timing is of the essence. There are cancelled vacations, too many sick days taken from work, and the necessity to plan ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
5 / 5 (1) Jun 13, 2010
intra cytoplasmic sperm injection


Yes, let's poke a hole in an oocyte then wonder why the child is deformed when born...sheesh.
JerryPark
not rated yet Jun 14, 2010
"At a time when infertility is increasing and more and more couples need to use ART to conceive, it is vitally important that we find out as much as we can about what is causing malformations in these children,"

For thirty years, we have been assisting infertile couples to conceive. Is it any wonder that infertility is increasing?

When we eliminate the natural process which tend to screen out genetic abnormalities, we should expect an increase in genetic abnormalities.

A large question is what is the legal liability associated with IVF and ICSI?
gwrede
5 / 5 (1) Jun 14, 2010
In normal fertilization, sperm have to race trough long and varied terrain. Only the very fittest ever get through, and the fastest of them are "eligible" for the grand prize.

All artificial fertilization methods miss this part of reproduction. At the most, somebody looks through a microscope and chooses a "live looking" sperm over a dead one. That's way too arbitrary.

If nature didn't need the careful selection of the winning sperm, then men's penises would be long enough to reach into the ovary. (Or there would be some other mechanism to make conception easier.)

trekgeek1
not rated yet Jun 14, 2010
Good point. Selecting a sperm at random doesn't really filter out the weak swimmers. They need to keep them all locked up for a few hours like a steel cage death match. Then the winner is selected. And while I realize that people want to have children at any cost sometimes, people need to realize that maybe there is a reason they can't get pregnant in certain cases. Maybe nature is telling you that the factory has suffered damage and production must halt. You don't know all the details, forcing conception causes a substandard production facility to give it its best shot.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.