Hubble Images Suggest Rogue Asteroid Smacked Jupiter

Jun 03, 2010
These NASA Hubble Space Telescope snapshots reveal an impact scar on Jupiter fading from view over several months between July 2009 and November 2009. Credit: NASA, ESA,

(PhysOrg.com) -- Without warning, a mystery object struck Jupiter on July 19, 2009, leaving a dark bruise the size of the Pacific Ocean. The spot first caught the eye of an amateur astronomer in Australia, and soon, observatories around the world, including NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, were zeroing in on the unexpected blemish.

Astronomers had witnessed this kind of cosmic event before. Similar scars had been left behind during the course of a week in July 1994, when more than 20 pieces of Comet P/ (SL9) plunged into Jupiter's atmosphere. The 2009 impact occurred during the same week, 15 years later.

Astronomers who compared Hubble images of both collisions say the culprit may have been an asteroid about 1,600 feet (500 meters) wide. The images, therefore, may show for the first time the immediate aftermath of an asteroid, rather than a comet, striking another planet.

The bombardments reveal that the solar system is a rambunctious place, where unpredictable events may occur more frequently than first thought. Jupiter impacts were expected to occur every few hundred to few thousand years. Although there are surveys to catalogue asteroids, many small bodies may still go unnoticed and show up anytime to wreak havoc.

"This solitary event caught us by surprise, and we can only see the aftermath of the impact, but fortunately we do have the 1994 Hubble observations that captured the full range of impact phenomena, including the nature of the objects from pre-impact observations" says astronomer Heidi Hammel of the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colo., leader of the Jupiter impact study.

In 2009 Hammel's team snapped images of the debris field with Hubble's recently installed 3 and newly repaired Advanced Camera for Surveys.

The analysis revealed key differences between the two collisions (in 1994 and 2009), providing clues to the 2009 event. Astronomers saw a distinct halo around the 1994 impact sites in Hubble ultraviolet (UV) images, evidence of fine dust arising from a comet-fragment strike. The UV images also showed a strong contrast between impact-generated debris and Jupiter's clouds.

Hubble ultraviolet images of the 2009 impact showed no halo and also revealed that the site's contrast faded rapidly. Both clues suggest a lack of lightweight particles, providing circumstantial evidence for an impact by a solid asteroid rather than a dusty comet.

The elongated shape of the recent impact site also differs from the 1994 strike, indicating that the 2009 object descended from a shallower angle than the SL9 fragments. The 2009 body also came from a different direction than the SL9 pieces.

Team member Agustin Sanchez-Lavega of the University of the Basque Country in Bilbao, Spain, and colleagues performed an analysis of possible orbits that the 2009 impacting body could have taken to collide with Jupiter. Their work indicates the object probably came from the Hilda family of bodies, a secondary asteroid belt consisting of more than 1,100 asteroids orbiting near Jupiter.

The 2009 strike was equal to a few thousand standard nuclear bombs exploding, comparable to the blasts from the medium-sized fragments of SL9. The largest of those fragments created explosions that were many times more powerful than the world's entire nuclear arsenal blowing up at once.

The recent impact underscores the important work performed by amateur astronomers. "This event beautifully illustrates how amateur and professional astronomers can work together," notes Hammel.

Occasional dark spots have appeared on Jupiter throughout the history of sky watching. Observing records of the planet are filled with references to spots, including "white spots," "peculiar spots," and "well-defined spots." Only a handful may have described possible Jupiter strikes.

In 1686, the Italian astronomer Giovanni Cassini reported a dark spot on Jupiter that was roughly the size of the largest SL9 . Nearly 150 years later, in 1834, British astronomer George Airy independently reported a dark feature in Jupiter's southern belts that looked nearly four times as large as shadows cast on the planet by the Galilean moons. Crude telescopes prevented sky watchers from probing the nature of those spots.

The study by Hammel's team appeared in the June 1 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

You can now listen to all PhysOrg.com podcasts at phys.org/podcasts-news/

Explore further: Comet Jacques makes a 'questionable' appearance

Related Stories

Hubble captures rare Jupiter collision

Jul 25, 2009

For the past several days the world's largest telescopes have been trained on Jupiter. Not to miss the potentially new science in the unfolding drama 580 million kilometres away, Matt Mountain, director of ...

Jupiter, solar system's 'big bully,' takes a punch

Jul 30, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers have been turning the world's most powerful telescopes toward Jupiter, the solar system's largest planet, ever since Australian amateur astronomer Anthony Wesley discovered a new ...

What Hit Jupiter?

Aug 03, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- It began with a furrowed brow, a moment of puzzlement, quickly dismissed.

Jupiter had temporary moon for 12 years

Sep 14, 2009

Comet 147P/Kushida-Muramatsu was captured as a temporary moon of Jupiter in the mid-20th century and remained trapped in an irregular orbit for about twelve years.

Recommended for you

Mysterious molecules in space

3 hours ago

Over the vast, empty reaches of interstellar space, countless small molecules tumble quietly though the cold vacuum. Forged in the fusion furnaces of ancient stars and ejected into space when those stars ...

Comet Jacques makes a 'questionable' appearance

Jul 28, 2014

What an awesome photo! Italian amateur astronomer Rolando Ligustri nailed it earlier today using a remote telescope in New Mexico and wide-field 4-inch (106 mm) refractor. Currently the brightest comet in ...

Image: Our flocculent neighbour, the spiral galaxy M33

Jul 28, 2014

The spiral galaxy M33, also known as the Triangulum Galaxy, is one of our closest cosmic neighbours, just three million light-years away. Home to some forty billion stars, it is the third largest in the ...

Image: Chandra's view of the Tycho Supernova remnant

Jul 25, 2014

More than four centuries after Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe first observed the supernova that bears his name, the supernova remnant it created is now a bright source of X-rays. The supersonic expansion of ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1 / 5 (4) Jun 03, 2010
There are Main Belt asteroids made up almost entirely of ices. If one happened to come into the inner system it would be indistinguishable from a comet.

I would hazard a guess that there are Knieper Belt and Oort Cloud objects that are made primarily of Rock. If these fell into the Asteroid Belt they would be indistinguishable from a Main Belt Asteroid.

Wouldn't it be more consistent to say that, "the object that struck Jove wasn't neither icy or dusty and that, by inference, it is believed that the object was a the Main Belt planetesimal, not an Oort Cloud or Knieper Belt object?
dtxx
2.3 / 5 (3) Jun 03, 2010
Because saying it's a hilda object covers all of the info in your last paragraph?
Quantum_Conundrum
3 / 5 (3) Jun 03, 2010
may have been an asteroid about 1,600 feet (500 meters) wide


We need some serious space-based radar probes and a plan to deal with asteroids of this size. This isn't a global killer, but man, this would be maybe equivalent to a VEI 7 or 8 eruption if it hit land. If it hit water, it'd be even worse.
LuckyBrandon
1 / 5 (1) Jun 03, 2010
I don't know quantum, id think anything marking jupiter with a spot the size of the pacific would devastate life on earth...a severely large mass extinction...
Sonhouse
not rated yet Jun 03, 2010
The chances of asteroids and comets hitting the Earth are a lot smaller than those hitting Jupiter because we are out of the way of most of them and Jove has such a large mass and large gravity well so it will get hit with a lot more regularity than here on Earth. We need to be vigilant but we don't need to get paranoid about it.
Arkaleus
1 / 5 (3) Jun 03, 2010
I have this marvelous idea of using water rich asteroids and comets as supplies of water for large star faring spacecraft. We can use that water to form a spherical shell of ice that can help shield us from cosmic radiation and provide water for the journey.

We can also use the metal ores found in these same celestial objects to refine them and redeposit them bit by bit into hulls using ion beams and other forms of epitaxy. It sure is a lot easier than trying to lift all that mass into orbit from earth.
LuckyBrandon
1 / 5 (2) Jun 03, 2010
sonhouse-thank you for being captain obvious my friend :) In all seriousness though, I agree with you, however, the millions of times the earth has been hit of objects of varying size (including the ELE sized ones) should dictate that we set up some type of surveillance and probably weaponry too to address them as needed.
Shootist
1 / 5 (3) Jun 03, 2010
The earth is struck by this size (500m) object every 100,000 years or so.

11,000 megatons or thereabouts.

http://www.lpi.us...-954.pdf