UN science chief defends work, welcomes review

May 14, 2010 By ARTHUR MAX , Associated Press Writer
In a Jan. 23, 2010 file photo the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Rajendra Pachauri speaks during a press conference in New Delhi, India. Pachauri Friday May 14, 2010 cautioned the independent scientific committee reviewing the IPCC's work not to undermine scientists' motivation for contributing to reports on global warming. . (AP Photo/Mustafa Quraishi/file)

(AP) -- The head of the U.N. scientific body on climate change defended Friday the work of the thousands of scientists who contribute to its reports, even as he welcomed a review of procedures that produced errors undermining the panel's public credibility.

The chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Rajendra Pachauri, cautioned an independent scientific committee reviewing the IPCC's work not to undermine scientists' motivation for contributing to reports on global warming.

The voluminous reports of the scientific panel are credited with raising the alarm that human emissions of already have led to a gradual warming of the globe, and if unchecked could lead to catastrophic changes in , rising sea levels and the extinction of about one-third of the species on Earth. The IPCC shared the 2007 Nobel Peace prize with former Vice President Al Gore.

But its reports have been dismissed by climate skeptics who attribute to natural cycles. The skeptics were bolstered by a series of errors in the IPCC's 2007 report.

Pachauri told the committee's first review meeting that the panel's conclusions are valid, even in areas where mistakes were discovered.

Pointing to the most glaring error, a claim that the world's glaciers will melt by 2035, Pachauri said glaciers are indeed melting, though not that fast. Nonetheless, glacial melt accounts for 28 percent of , and the panel's assessment on contains "a lot of facts which we can ignore at our peril."

Pachauri said the panel is comprised of volunteer scientists contributing several years of their own time and who disband after issuing their report. The panel has no mechanism for responding to criticism once the reports are issued, other than the small secretariat.

"We need to develop an ability and a capacity to communicate better with the outside world," he told the 15 top scientists from around the world summoned to sit on the review committee..

Pachauri acknowledged the response to the errors was inadequate, but said the attack on the panel was unprecedented.

He said the panel's procedures already are robust, but he welcomed any suggestion that would improve accuracy.

The review is expected to take several weeks before it issues recommendations on how to tighten the IPCC procedures.

Explore further: Weird weather lingers in Alaska's largest city

3 /5 (10 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Glacier alarm 'regrettable error': UN climate head

Jan 23, 2010

The head of the UN's climate science panel said Saturday a doomsday prediction about the fate of Himalayan glaciers was "a regrettable error" but that he would not resign over the blunder.

Netherlands adds to UN climate report controversy

Feb 05, 2010

The Netherlands has asked the UN climate change panel to explain an inaccurate claim in a landmark 2007 report that more than half the country was below sea level, the Dutch government said Friday.

Scientists seek better way to do climate report

Feb 10, 2010

(AP) -- A steady drip of unsettling errors is exposing what scientists are calling "the weaker link" in the Nobel Peace Prize-winning series of international reports on global warming.

Recommended for you

New challenges for ocean acidification research

11 hours ago

Over the past decade, ocean acidification has received growing recognition not only in the scientific area. Decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public are becoming increasingly aware of "the other carbon dioxide ...

Compromises lead to climate change deal

11 hours ago

Earlier this month, delegates from the various states that make up the UN met in Lima, Peru, to agree on a framework for the Climate Change Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris next year. For ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

deatopmg
2 / 5 (4) May 15, 2010
"He said the panel's procedures already are robust, but he welcomed any suggestion that would improve accuracy."

If they are "robust" then all of the lies, hearsay, distortions, and fallacies found so far would have been weeded out looong before any IPCC reports were issued. The only thing weeded out has been scientists and peer reviewers w/ opposing views. This is borne out by the increasing propaganda content over time.

Based on the evidence, this man on the take is a charlatan and a parasite.
Alizee
May 15, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Alizee
May 15, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
omatumr
4.3 / 5 (3) May 15, 2010
There is no defense for fraud and deception in science.

Oliver K. Manuel

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.