Enlisting more nonscientists can boost confidence in research

May 04, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- In an era of public skepticism about science and high-stakes decisions based on it, involving more nonscientists in research projects can boost public acceptance, understanding and the quality of the scientific results, a study co-authored by a UC Davis researcher suggests.

The study will be presented today at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Denver.

For years, the National Foundation has encouraged the inclusion of volunteers from the public in the collection of data for scientific research. Through its funding, the NSF has institutionalized such so-called “citizen science.”

But Heidi Ballard, an assistant professor of education at UC Davis, and a team of researchers from other universities urge going even further, to encourage an approach in which professional scientists and volunteers design and work together on research projects.

“Issues such as and land-use decisions require us to look at the pieces and put them together in novel ways,” said Ballard. “So we ask, ‘What do local people already know or can contribute to science? And what can scientists contribute to educating these people?’”

Ballard and her colleagues developed a model for looking at three different levels of volunteer involvement. Their study, “Public Participation in Scientific Research as a Tool for Ecological and Environmental Education,” looks at how the NSF and scientists might assess learning outcomes across all three models, which reflect varying levels of engagement among nonscientist volunteers.

“I’m really interested in figuring out how learning from each other can be facilitated by working together in a wide variety of ways on scientific research and monitoring, particularly in the environmental sciences,” Ballard said. “How does this contribute to a better understanding of environmental and social-ecological systems, and how to manage them and behave in sustainable ways as individuals and a society?”

Ballard and her colleagues surmise that the more empowered nonscientists are in the creation of a research project, the more likely they will view science as a tool to discover and solve problems.

Explore further: Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Scientists to assess societal implications of nanotechnology

Oct 12, 2005

How will rapid technological change influence democracy, affect our privacy, and even change human identity itself? The National Science Foundation has awarded $6.2 million to explore such questions at the new Center for ...

Inmates conduct ecological research on slow-growing mosses

Oct 20, 2008

Nalini Nadkarni of Evergreen State College currently advises a team of researchers who sport shaved heads, tattooed biceps and prison-issued garb rather than the lab coats and khakis typically worn by researchers. ...

UI researcher cites need for a 'small view' of the environment

Feb 18, 2007

By thinking small, scientists can solve big environmental problems. That is the message University of Iowa researcher Vicki H. Grassian delivered to colleagues Sunday, Feb. 18, at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Association ...

Research Looks at How Open Source Software Gets Written

Sep 20, 2006

Computer software systems are now among the most complex, expensive artifacts ever created by humans, and some of the most sophisticated are being built by teams of volunteers as "open source" projects, where any programmer ...

Recommended for you

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

14 hours ago

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

22 hours ago

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 0