BP struggles to cap leak as US oil slick spreads

Apr 26, 2010 by Allen Johnson
US Coast Guard issued image shows fire boat response crews battling the blazing remnants of the offshore oil rig Deepwater Horizon. British oil giant BP has been using robotic underwater vehicles to try and cap a leaking well and prevent a growing oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico from developing into an environmental disaster.

British oil giant BP used robotic underwater vehicles Monday to try to cap a leaking well and prevent a growing oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico from developing into an environmental disaster.

Satellite images showed the slick had spread by 50 percent in a day to cover an area of 600 square miles (1,550 square kilometers), although officials said some 97 percent of the was just a thin veneer on the sea's surface.

BP has dispatched skimming vessels to mop up the oil leaking from the debris of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which sank on Thursday, two days after a massive explosion left 11 workers missing and presumed dead.

The company said at least four underwater robots, similar to scaled-down submarines, are being employed for a first-of-its-kind attempt to stop the leak by plugging up the leaking well.

Doug Suttles, chief operating officer of BP Exploration & Production Suttles told a press conference outside New Orleans Sunday that workers will use a "blowout preventer" -- a piece of back-up equipment installed near the wellhead, but which has failed to function properly since the rig went down -- to try to plug the leaks.

"It has not been done before, but we have the world's best experts working to make it happen," said the BP executive, who warned that if the attempt fails, it might take as long as two to three months to staunch the leaking well.

BP said it was trying to activate the giant 450-tonne, 50-foot high machine using remotely operated submersible vehicles. At the same time, it is also preparing to drill relief wells that would permanently shut off the oil flow.

"Essentially, they're trying to put a cork in a bottle of champagne," Richard Metcalf, a mechanical engineer at the pro-industry Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Association told AFP.

BP estimated that the leaks, some 5,000 feet (almost one mile) down on the seabed, emanate from two holes in the riser that connects the wellhead to the sunken rig and are were releasing 1,000 barrels, 42,000 gallons, of oil a day.

The coast guard, which conducted two overflights on Saturday and Sunday to assess the extent of the , described it as a "very serious spill."

Five aircraft and 32 spill response vessels -- skimmers, tugs, barges and recovery boats -- were hoping to resume efforts to mop up the slick after weather delays on Saturday.

So far, the slick is not threatening the coast of Louisiana more than 40 miles away, where it could endanger ecologically fragile wetlands that are a paradise for rare waterfowl and other wildlife.

"In the trajectory analysis we don't see any impact to any shoreline within the next three days," Charlie Henry, scientific support coordinator of the US government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), told journalists.

BP said chemical products had also been poured into the slick to help the dispersal process and more were in stock.

And Steve Benz, head of the independent Marine Spill Response Corporation, said that at BP's request he was mounting the largest response effort in his group's 20-year history and BP officials expressed confidence that they will be able to contain the spill offshore.

Still, environmentalists were sounding an alarm about the possible threat to Louisiana's fragile wildlife, and experts said the spill has the potential to be the worst seen in the United States since the 1989 Exxon Valdez tanker spill, considered one of the worst man-made environmental disasters.

That spill poured nearly 11 million gallons of crude into Alaska's Prince William Sound, devastating some 750 miles of its once pristine shores.

Meanwhile, there was still no news of the 11 missing Horizon crew members.

The US coast guard, which helped evacuate another 115 to safety after Tuesday's spectacular blast, which shot balls of flame leaping into the night sky, aborted its massive air and sea search on Friday.

Investigations are ongoing into the cause of the accident, which would be the worst in decades on a US offshore platform if the missing men are not found.

Explore further: Weird weather lingers in Alaska's largest city

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

'Major oil spill' as rig sinks off US coast

Apr 23, 2010

A blazing oil rig has sunk into the Gulf of Mexico, sparking fears of an environmental disaster two days after a massive blast that left 11 workers missing.

Fuel spill at same Alaska reef as Exxon Valdez

Dec 25, 2009

A tugboat struck the same reef as the Exxon Valdez tanker 20 years ago, spilling diesel into Alaska's Prince William Sound and creating a three-mile-long slick, the US Coast Guard said on Friday.

Recommended for you

New challenges for ocean acidification research

7 hours ago

Over the past decade, ocean acidification has received growing recognition not only in the scientific area. Decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public are becoming increasingly aware of "the other carbon dioxide ...

Compromises lead to climate change deal

8 hours ago

Earlier this month, delegates from the various states that make up the UN met in Lima, Peru, to agree on a framework for the Climate Change Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris next year. For ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

baudrunner
not rated yet Apr 26, 2010
British Petroleum should pay through the nose for this. I was under the understanding that these wells were pretty much fool-proof. The well should be valve-coupled on the sea bed in the event that this sort of thing happens. It should automatically close off the supply when the coupling or pipe somehow disengages.
lengould100
not rated yet Apr 27, 2010
So i wonder how many poor waterfowl and fish have been killed already by this 600 sq. mi. crude oil slick (about 60 times larger than the tailings ponds at Canada's oil sands). Being bird migration season now, would it be 1000 times more than the small handful which have gotten past the continuous defences and been harmed by the Canadian oil sands? 10,000 times more?

Let those stupid american "environmentalists" trying to shut down the oil sands projects fix up their own backyard, and keep their oily noses out of other peoples business.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.