Breast cancer screening program should give higher importance to younger women

Apr 02, 2010

Screening younger women for breast cancer is fairer and makes sound economic sense, according to new research by the University of East Anglia.

Published online today by the leading journal Value in Health, the study assessed the current screening guidelines in terms of both cost effectiveness and fairness.

The researchers concluded that extending the hotly-debated screening programme to would have real benefits in terms of both economic efficiency and equity. The approach could also be used for other fatal diseases with similar age distributions.

"Screening only older women increases unfair disparities in terms of , quality of life and incidence of disease," said principal investigator Prof Louis Niessen, a public health economist at UEA's School of Medicine.

"Our findings show that extending to younger women will lead to a better mix of health programmes and a more balanced approach to the fight against ."

Prof Niessen urged policymakers and agencies such as NICE to use proper value-based weighing methods and take women's preferences into account when next reviewing breast cancer control guidelines.

Explore further: DNA alternative to Pap smear sparks medical debate (Update)

More information: 'Incorporating equity-efficiency interactions in cost-effectiveness analysis - three approaches applied to breast cancer control' by S Baeten (Erasmus Medical Centre, Netherlands), R Baltussen (Radboud University, Netherlands), C Uyl-de Groot (Erasmus Medical Centre, Netherlands), J Bridges (Johns Hopkins University, US) and L Niessen (UEA, Johns Hopkins University and Erasmus Medical Centre) is published by Value in Health on April 2 2010.

Provided by University of East Anglia

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

No need for gene screens in breast cancer families

Jul 23, 2008

Research reported today should provide relief to women who are worried after a relative's breast cancer diagnosis. The study in the open access journal BMC Cancer shows that a family history of breast cancer does not give a ...

Recommended for you

DNA alternative to Pap smear sparks medical debate (Update)

16 hours ago

A high-tech screening tool for cervical cancer is facing pushback from more than a dozen American patient groups, who warn that the genetic test could displace a simpler, cheaper and more established mainstay of women's health: ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mysticshakra
not rated yet Apr 02, 2010
There is no fight against breast cancer, only endless money being spent and nothing to show for it. The best they come up with is to radiate a breast every year until it causes what they are looking for.

Then they ignore the correlation between bra wearing and breast cancer because it would be inconvenient and disrupt commerce.

All cancer research is an bottomless money pit.

More news stories

What are the chances that your dad isn't your dad?

How confident are you that the man you call dad is really your biological father? If you believe some of the most commonly-quoted figures, you could be forgiven for not being very confident at all. But how ...

Making 'bucky-balls' in spin-out's sights

(Phys.org) —A new Oxford spin-out firm is targeting the difficult challenge of manufacturing fullerenes, known as 'bucky-balls' because of their spherical shape, a type of carbon nanomaterial which, like ...

Gene removal could have implications beyond plant science

(Phys.org) —For thousands of years humans have been tinkering with plant genetics, even when they didn't realize that is what they were doing, in an effort to make stronger, healthier crops that endured climates better, ...