Explained: Climate sensitivity

Mar 19, 2010 by David L. Chandler
Graphic: Christine Daniloff

Climate sensitivity is the term used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to express the relationship between the human-caused emissions that add to the Earth's greenhouse effect -- carbon dioxide and a variety of other greenhouse gases -- and the temperature changes that will result from these emissions.

Specifically, the term is defined as how much the average global surface temperature will increase if there is a doubling of greenhouse gases (expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents) in the air, once the planet has had a chance to settle into a new equilibrium after the increase occurs. In other words, it’s a direct measure of how the Earth’s climate will respond to that doubling.

That value, according to the most recent IPCC report, is 3 degrees Celsius, with a range of uncertainty from 2 to 4.5 degrees.

This sensitivity depends primarily on all the different feedback effects, both positive and negative, that either amplify or diminish the . There are three primary feedback effects — clouds, and ; these, combined with other feedback effects, produce the greatest uncertainties in predicting the planet’s future climate.

With no feedback effects at all, the change would be just 1 degree Celsius, climate scientists agree. Virtually all of the controversies over hinge on just how strong the various feedbacks may be — and on whether scientists may have failed to account for some of them.

Clouds are a good example. Clouds can have either a positive or negative feedback effect, depending on their altitude and the size of their water droplets. Overall, most scientists expect this net effect to be positive, but there are large uncertainties.

“There is still lots of uncertainty in what the climate sensitivity is,” says Andrei Sokolov, a research scientist in MIT’s Center for Global Change Science, who has been doing research on climate sensitivity for many years. “Feedback is what’s driving things,” he says.

It is important to note that climate sensitivity is figured on the basis of an overall doubling, compared to pre-industrial levels, of and other greenhouse gases. But the temperature change given by this definition of climate sensitivity is only part of the story. The actual increase might be greater in the long run because levels in the atmosphere could more than double without strong policies to control emissions. But in the short run, the actual warming could be less than suggested by the climate sensitivity, since due to the thermal inertia of the ocean, it may take some time after a doubling of the concentration is reached before the climate reaches a new equilibrium.

This is the second part of an “Explained” on climate change. Part one dealt with radiative forcing.

Explore further: Extreme shrimp may hold clues to alien life

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Water vapor confirmed as major player in climate change

Nov 17, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Water vapor is known to be Earth's most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated ...

Explained: Radiative forcing

Mar 10, 2010

When people talk about global warming or the greenhouse effect, the main underlying scientific concept that describes the process is radiative forcing. And despite all the recent controversy over leaked emails ...

Recommended for you

Extreme shrimp may hold clues to alien life

1 hour ago

(Phys.org) —At one of the world's deepest undersea hydrothermal vents, tiny shrimp are piled on top of each other, layer upon layer, crawling on rock chimneys that spew hot water. Bacteria, inside the shrimps' ...

Erosion may trigger earthquakes

Nov 21, 2014

Researchers from laboratories at Géosciences Rennes (CNRS/Université de Rennes 1), Géosciences Montpellier (CNRS/Université de Montpellier 2) and Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (CNRS/IPGP/Université Paris Diderot), ...

Strong undersea earthquake hits eastern Indonesia

Nov 21, 2014

A strong undersea earthquake hit off the coast of eastern Indonesia on Friday, but there were no immediate reports of injuries or serious damage and officials said it was unlikely to trigger a tsunami.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Loodt
1.9 / 5 (9) Mar 19, 2010
...There is still lots of uncertainty in what the climate sensitivity is...

So the Science isn't settled!

QED
JayK
2.6 / 5 (5) Mar 19, 2010
The theory of gravity isn't certain, so lets all fly!!!!

Weeee?
brant
2.1 / 5 (7) Mar 19, 2010
Come on already. The IPCC has been discredited.....

I personally dont believe anything they say anymore. They are not a true scientific panel.
frenchie
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 23, 2010
nope, you'd like to think the IPCC has been discredited to fit your political agenda and / or viewpoint.

Only in america's great fixed news machine does this "IPCC controversy" even really exist. But whatever, its part of the anti-elitist / scientist / "people who actually think" mentality.

Cheerio

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.