Study Examines How Nanoparticles Affect Marine Organisms

Feb 22, 2010
J. Evan Ward, professor of marine sciences, shows visitors live video of research on mussels at his lab during a tour of the Marine Sciences Building. Photo by Peter Morenus

(PhysOrg.com) -- When nanoparticles from consumer products leach into the ocean, they may harm oysters and mussels.

Manufactured nanomaterials can be found in such diverse applications as electronics, cosmetics, paints, and even medicines, but their effects on the environment remain largely unknown. In a new laboratory study, scientists have found that saltwater and mussels take up and retain significant amounts of manufactured from in clumps of so-called “marine snow.”

“Nanomaterials are being used in increasing amounts, and it’s likely they’re being released in increasing amounts into the environment, including the ocean,” says Evan Ward, professor of marine sciences at UConn’s Avery Point campus. “As we develop these technologies, we need to be cautious, we need to know where the particles are going, and we need to know how they affect .”

Nanoparticles are tiny versions of common materials that have a diameter of less than 100 , or about four millionths of an inch. Their tininess gives them properties that normal-sized particles don’t have: for example, their large surface area for their size makes them stronger, lighter, and more reflective, making them ideal for reinforcing metals, increasing the SPF in your sunscreen, and producing paint that improves your home’s energy efficiency.

Some scientists, however, are concerned that these very properties could also make manufactured nanoparticles dangerous. When products break down in landfills, nanoparticles can wash away into soils, waterways, and the ocean, potentially creating hazards to animals and plants.

“Some materials that one would assume are safe can in fact cause damage to cells in their ‘nano’ form,” Ward says.

Ward studies the environmental physiology of oysters, mussels, and their relatives, which use their gills as specialized filters to take up food from . Although nanoparticles themselves are too small to be captured in large amounts, Ward’s study focused on how the bivalves’ feeding ecology affected their rate of uptake.

“In our study, we took into account how nanoparticles are likely to be delivered to the animals in the natural environment,” he says. “We asked, ‘What’s the setting in which they will be exposed to these particles?’”

Materials rarely exist as individual particles in the ocean, says Ward; instead, ocean currents bind up particles and sticky organic matter into aggregates that scientists call “marine snow.” These aggregates then sink to the bottom, where filter feeders like bivalves ingest them.

In their paper, published in Marine Environmental Research, Ward and coauthor Dustin Kach, a former UConn graduate student, used natural seawater to produce marine snow that contained fluorescently labeled polystyrene nanoparticles. They then exposed oysters and collected from the Long Island Sound to this snow-filled seawater.

The researchers found that nanoparticles were taken up in much higher amounts when the bivalves were exposed to marine snow. But they also found that when filtered from marine snow, nanoparticles remained in the bivalves’ bodies for a much longer time than would be expected for non-nutritive materials: up to three days.

Ward suspects that the particles are being treated as food by the animals, and are being taken up into their digestive cells. This could be particularly dangerous, he says, since small nanoparticles can circumvent living cells’ natural defenses.

“Because of their high surface area, manufactured nanoparticles can strip off electrons from other compounds and create free radicals,” he says. “Particles like these can cause havoc in cells.”

Ward sees his work as a first step in understanding the potential issues associated with manufactured nanoparticles. He emphasizes that further work is needed to determine the amounts of manufactured nanoparticles in seawater and their levels of toxicity to living things.

“Right now there are few techniques to identify manufactured nanomaterials in the natural environment because they’re so darn small,” he says. “With these studies, we hope to demonstrate potential problems to keep in step with the use of nanomaterials. Then when techniques are available to sample them in the wild, we’ll be prepared to say whether or not we should be worried.”

Explore further: New cancer-hunting 'nano-robots' to seek and destroy tumours

More information: www.elsevier.com/wps/find/jour… cription#description

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

EPA wants nanotechnology studied

Mar 16, 2006

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency awarded grants worth $5 billion Thursday for a study of the health and environmental effects of nanotechnology.

Fate of nanoparticles

Aug 30, 2004

Materials made from particles one-millionth the size of a fine-point pen tip are touted daily for their current uses and dreamed of possibilities, but a pressing question remains as to the environmental impact of manufactured ...

When Nano May Not Be Nano

Sep 13, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The same properties of nanoparticles that make them so appealing to manufacturers may also have negative effects on the environment and human health. However, little is known which particles ...

Recommended for you

Introducing the multi-tasking nanoparticle

Aug 26, 2014

Kit Lam and colleagues from UC Davis and other institutions have created dynamic nanoparticles (NPs) that could provide an arsenal of applications to diagnose and treat cancer. Built on an easy-to-make polymer, these particles ...

Tissue regeneration using anti-inflammatory nanomolecules

Aug 22, 2014

Anyone who has suffered an injury can probably remember the after-effects, including pain, swelling or redness. These are signs that the body is fighting back against the injury. When tissue in the body is damaged, biological ...

Cut flowers last longer with silver nanotechnology

Aug 21, 2014

Once cut and dunked in a vase of water, flowers are susceptible to bacterial growth that shortens the length of time one has to enjoy the blooms. A few silver nanoparticles sprinkled into the water, might be the answer to ...

User comments : 0