NY Times executives discuss plan to charge online readers

Feb 20, 2010 by Chris Lefkow
In this photo illustration the NYTimes.com Web site is displayed on a laptop January 20 in New York City. Top New York Times executives expressed confidence Friday that a plan to start charging readers of the newspaper's website from next year will not result in a significant loss of traffic.

Top New York Times executives expressed confidence Friday that a plan to start charging readers of the newspaper's website from next year will not result in a significant loss of traffic.

"We are, and have been for quite a long time, the largest newspaper-owned website in the world," said Martin Nisenholtz, the senior vice president for digital operations at the Times.

"We intend to remain the largest newspaper-owned website in the world," Nisenholtz said at "paidContent 2010," a day-long conference here hosted by technology and media website paidContent.org.

The Times Co. announced last month that it would begin charging readers of NYTimes.com in early 2011, using a "metered model" that will offer users free access to a set number of articles before they will be asked to pay.

"We have reached a point where we have enough scope and scale to make this move," Nisenholtz said, adding that the goal is to "maximize overall revenue" through online subscriptions and online advertising.

"The metered model will allow us to remain a very, very large website at the same time as we get a second revenue stream," he said.

Nisenholtz, Times Co. chairman Arthur Sulzberger and Times Co. president and Janet Robinson answered questions about the plan during a panel discussion at paidContent 2010 but revealed few new details.

Their move is being closely watched by others in a US newspaper industry faced with declining print , falling circulation and the migration of readers to free news online.

The and Long Island's Newsday are currently the only major US newspapers charging readers for full online access.

A number of other US publishers are considering the move but fear it may drive readers away and result in a loss of revenue from online advertising.

"We believe the direction we're headed is going to be the direction that quality information, and maybe not quality information, is going to be going," Sulzberger said.

"It's a question of seeing what works, adapting it, making it work better," he said. "This is the next step on a journey of transformation."

Sulzberger cautioned that charging readers may not be for everybody.

"The answer we're coming up with is not necessarily the right answer at this moment in time for other news organizations. There are other opportunities that might work for them," he said.

"This is an answer, we believe, for The in its particular place in society in the United States and globally," he said.

The executives defended the newspaper's last experience with making readers pay, a system called TimesSelect which involved putting columnists and editorials behind a pay wall. TimesSelect was aborted after 18 months.

"It was not a failure," Robinson said. "It proved that people were willing to pay for content, certainly of a premium nature."

"We were making good money off of TimesSelect," Sulzberger added. "We simply knew we could make more by taking it down."

Nisenholtz declined to specify how many users the Times had determined would be ready to pay for the newspaper online.

"The research tells us that a sufficient number of users are open to the idea to make this a viable model," he said. "That's all we're going to say."

Citing Nielsen figures, Nisenholtz said NYTimes.com receives about 21 million unique visitors a month from the United States and "some will pay because they're heavy users of our site."

Nisenholtz also said the Times' currently free Apple iPhone application had been downloaded 3.2 million times and would likely be included in the metered model when NYTimes.com begins charging next year.

Explore further: Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Newsday to charge online fees for non-subscribers

Oct 22, 2009

(AP) -- Newsday will start charging some readers $5 per week for access to its Web site beginning next Wednesday, a move many newspapers have been contemplating but few have yet to try for fear of driving readers away.

Future of newspapers is digital: Murdoch

May 28, 2009

News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch said on Thursday that the future of newspapers is digital, but it may be 10 to 15 years before readers go fully electronic.

News Corp. plans fees for newspaper Web sites

Aug 06, 2009

(AP) -- Visitors to the Web sites of newspapers owned by News Corp. will have to start coughing up fees to read the news within the next year, Chairman Rupert Murdoch said.

New York Times to ask Web readers to pay up in '11

Jan 20, 2010

(AP) -- The New York Times plans to charge readers for full access to its Web site next year, reviving an idea that fizzled twice for the newspaper. This time it's betting that it will be able to wring more ...

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

10 hours ago

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

Yelp to pay US fine for child privacy violation

17 hours ago

Online ratings operator Yelp agreed to pay $450,000 to settle US charges that it illegally collected data on children, in violation of privacy laws, officials said Wednesday.

A Closer Look: Your (online) life after death

Sep 16, 2014

Sure, you have a lot to do today—laundry, bills, dinner—but it's never too early to start planning for your digital afterlife, the fate of your numerous online accounts once you shed this mortal coil.

Web filter lifts block on gay sites

Sep 16, 2014

A popular online safe-search filter is ending its practice of blocking links to mainstream gay and lesbian advocacy groups for users hoping to avoid obscene sites.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 20, 2010
Isn't there a small NY rag that has already tried this? ISTR a report of them investing millions of dollars for THIRTY-FIVE subscribers and grossing $10,000.

The NYT is a dead man walking, it just hasn't fallen over yet.