Hospital ratings in the Dartmouth Atlas could lead health-care reform astray

Feb 17, 2010

A "Perspective" piece in today's New England Journal of Medicine by Peter B. Bach, MD, MAPP, points out that policy makers are relying on hospital ratings from the Dartmouth Atlas that could be misleading.

According to Dr. Bach, a physician and epidemiologist, who also studies health-care policy and quality and was the Senior Policy Advisor at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (or CMS) in 2005 and 2006, said that the Dartmouth Atlas hospital ratings don't account for differences in the types of patients that different hospitals treat, or factor in whether those hospitals have good or bad outcomes. Instead, Dr. Bach noted, the Atlas ratings, which are widely cited by policy makers and are posted on the Consumer Reports Website, assume all patients who die are the same and all hospitals have the same outcomes.

Dr. Bach is concerned that are not aware of these problems, and are instead using the Dartmouth ratings to guide health -reform efforts. "Once we institutionalize the Dartmouth hospital ratings, hospitals will use their scarce resources trying to conform to the Dartmouth scale, rather than trying to improve the quality of care they provide to their patients," said Dr. Bach, who is a physician, epidemiologist and health services researcher at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Dr. Bach noted that, "assessments of hospitals' costs and quality (i.e., their 'efficiency') must take into account whether hospitals have good or bad outcomes, factor in only the costs the hospitals can control, and consider the spectrum of patients the serves—those sick, those less sick, those young and those old. The Dartmouth rankings do not account for any of these things."

Explore further: The first UK medical school launches Google Glass technology in curriculum

Provided by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Top-rated hospitals don't always have superior outcomes

Jan 26, 2010

New research published in the January issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons finds that while popular hospital rating systems can help identify high-quality hospitals for cardiovascular operations, patien ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

THoKling
not rated yet Feb 19, 2010
One day, I'd love to see PhysOrg post the name and email address of some of these hack authors. That third paragraph makes no sense. Another boneheaded mistake passing by the editors. Good job!

The bottom line is important, though. Assuming the standards of one institution apply to all does not take into account the individual practices and policies within each hospital, nor does such an assumption take regional trends into account.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.