Hospital ratings in the Dartmouth Atlas could lead health-care reform astray

Feb 17, 2010

A "Perspective" piece in today's New England Journal of Medicine by Peter B. Bach, MD, MAPP, points out that policy makers are relying on hospital ratings from the Dartmouth Atlas that could be misleading.

According to Dr. Bach, a physician and epidemiologist, who also studies health-care policy and quality and was the Senior Policy Advisor at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (or CMS) in 2005 and 2006, said that the Dartmouth Atlas hospital ratings don't account for differences in the types of patients that different hospitals treat, or factor in whether those hospitals have good or bad outcomes. Instead, Dr. Bach noted, the Atlas ratings, which are widely cited by policy makers and are posted on the Consumer Reports Website, assume all patients who die are the same and all hospitals have the same outcomes.

Dr. Bach is concerned that are not aware of these problems, and are instead using the Dartmouth ratings to guide health -reform efforts. "Once we institutionalize the Dartmouth hospital ratings, hospitals will use their scarce resources trying to conform to the Dartmouth scale, rather than trying to improve the quality of care they provide to their patients," said Dr. Bach, who is a physician, epidemiologist and health services researcher at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Dr. Bach noted that, "assessments of hospitals' costs and quality (i.e., their 'efficiency') must take into account whether hospitals have good or bad outcomes, factor in only the costs the hospitals can control, and consider the spectrum of patients the serves—those sick, those less sick, those young and those old. The Dartmouth rankings do not account for any of these things."

Explore further: Medtronic spends $350M on another European deal

Provided by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Top-rated hospitals don't always have superior outcomes

Jan 26, 2010

New research published in the January issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons finds that while popular hospital rating systems can help identify high-quality hospitals for cardiovascular operations, patien ...

Recommended for you

Medtronic spends $350M on another European deal

9 hours ago

U.S. medical device maker Medtronic is building stronger ties to Europe, a couple months after announcing a $42.9 billion acquisition that involves moving its main executive offices across the Atlantic, where it can get a ...

Mind over matter for people with disabilities

Aug 26, 2014

People with serious physical disabilities are unable to do the everyday things that most of us take for granted despite having the will – and the brainpower – to do so. This is changing thanks to European ...

Ukraine's former world's tallest man dies

Aug 25, 2014

Ukraine's tallest man, who briefly held the world record but gave it up to live as a recluse, has died due to complications from the condition that saw him never stop growing, local media reported Monday.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

THoKling
not rated yet Feb 19, 2010
One day, I'd love to see PhysOrg post the name and email address of some of these hack authors. That third paragraph makes no sense. Another boneheaded mistake passing by the editors. Good job!

The bottom line is important, though. Assuming the standards of one institution apply to all does not take into account the individual practices and policies within each hospital, nor does such an assumption take regional trends into account.