Pay-for-performance in healthcare

Feb 09, 2010

BOSTON--Although the idea of pay-for-performance (P4P) is popular among healthcare policy makers and private insurers, the results do not necessarily translate to the patient.

A new study from the RAND Journal of Economics analyzes performance reports from medical groups who worked with a large network HMO which has been compiling quality data since 1993, pre-P4P. Lead researcher Kathleen J. Mullen says, "In the end, we failed to find evidence that a large P4P initiative either resulted in major improvement in quality or notable disruption in care.".

So how did policy makers and medical providers arrive at this miscalculation? A 2003 RAND study by Elizabeth McGlynn and colleagues found that on average American patients receive only fifty-five percent of recommended care. P4P seemed to be the answer to better quality care and effective preventative medicine.

The P4P reimbursement program rewards healthcare providers with bonuses for high marks in areas of preventative medicine (e.g., blood sugar testing for diabetics, cervical and screenings for at-risk patients). Recently the Institute of Medicine recommended that Medicare join ranks with the P4P private insurers (over 100) to offer better quality, incentive-based care. However, the research shows that, rather than encouraging providers to shift resources toward quality improvement more generally, P4P may instead only persuade providers to focus on narrow (incentivized) areas.

Although the researchers found that some incentivized measures of quality may have improved in response to P4P, they failed to find evidence of positive spillovers to other related aspects of care. This result casts doubt on the promise of P4P as a transformative mechanism for improving the general quality of the , and suggests caution in moving ahead with P4P and in interpreting the results of future studies.

Explore further: Retail pricing strategies: Do consumers prefer deep discounts or everyday low prices?

More information: To view the abstract for this article please visit www3.interscience.wiley.com/jo… l/123248403/abstract

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Considering the evidence in health care

Jan 11, 2010

Taking a more strongly evidence-based approach to medicine would help the US healthcare system recover its ranking among other nations and improve quality, access, efficiency, equity and healthy lives, according to a report ...

Extra pay does not improve hospital performance

Jun 05, 2007

Paying hospitals extra money does not appear to significantly improve the way they treat heart attack patients or how well those patients do. But giving hospitals the information that they need to improve heart attack care ...

Increasing health care value improves health care quality

Sep 24, 2008

Finding better ways to deliver healthcare to patients is key to ensuring that Medicare is able to meet the needs of the nation's baby boomers according to a new paper by Geisinger Health System published in Health Affairs.

Recommended for you

Ultra high definition TVs boost LG Display profit

7 hours ago

(AP)—LG Display Co. said profit for the April-June quarter more than doubled as a stronger won reduced the value of its foreign debt and the World Cup boosted demand for ultra-high-definition TVs.

Drugmaker GSK slashes annual profits forecast

7 hours ago

British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline on Wednesday slashed its 2014 profits forecast as second-quarter earnings sank on the back of weak US trade, adverse currency moves and a Chinese bribery probe.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nederlander
not rated yet Feb 13, 2010
The thought healthcare professionals will perform better or worse depending on if they are payed or not, to me seems a rather (USA-) American economical 'logic'.

I like to think medical professionals that cure people also have an income not necessary measured in money, more a 'psychological income': the satisfaction, even status, of curing a person.

The decision to cure someone while the insurance-company says the financial costs are too high, is not automatically an irrational decision that lies outside the scope of economic optimal performance, since these kind of decisions are just as well decisions aiming to satisfy certain needs; needs that have an effect on scarce resources like time to live for the patient and a 'psychological income' for the healthcare professional.