Engineers find significant environmental impacts with algae-based biofuel

Jan 21, 2010

With many companies investing heavily in algae-based biofuels, researchers from the University of Virginia's Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering have found there are significant environmental hurdles to overcome before fuel production ramps up. They propose using wastewater as a solution to some of these challenges.

These findings come after ExxonMobil invested $600 million last summer and the U.S. Department of Energy announced last week that it is awarding $78 million in stimulus money for research and development of the .

The U.Va. research, just published in the journal & Technology, demonstrates that production consumes more energy, has higher greenhouse gas emissions and uses more water than other biofuel sources, such as switchgrass, canola and corn.

"Given what we know about algae production pilot projects over the past 10 to 15 years, we've found that algae's environmental footprint is larger than other terrestrial crops," said Andres Clarens, an assistant professor in U.Va.'s Civil and Environmental Department and lead author on the paper.
Clarens collaborated on the paper with Lisa M. Colosi, also an assistant professor in the
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department; Eleazar P. Resurreccion, a graduate student in the department; and Mark A. White, a professor in U.Va.'s McIntire School of Commerce.

As an environmentally sustainable alternative to current algae production methods, the researchers propose situating algae production ponds behind wastewater treatment facilities to capture phosphorous and nitrogen - essential nutrients for growing algae that would otherwise need to be produced from petroleum. Those same nutrients are discharged to local waterways, damaging the Chesapeake Bay and other water bodies, and current technology to remove them is prohibitively expensive.

While the researchers found algae production to have a greater environmental impact than other sources, it remains an attractive source for energy. Algae, which are grown in water, don't compete with food crops grown on land and also tend to have higher energy yields than sources such as corn or switchgrass. Additionally, algae's high lipid content makes for efficient refinement to liquid fuels that could be used to power vehicles, according to the research.

"Before we make major investments in algae production, we should really know the environmental impact of this technology," Clarens said. "If we do decide to move forward with algae as a fuel source, it's important we understand the ways we can produce it with the least impact, and that's where combining production with wastewater treatment operations comes in."

As an example of the importance of completing the environmental life cycle study, Clarens points to the 2008 ethanol boom which created a spike in corn prices worldwide and raised complex ethical issues that could have been avoided by producing separate crops for food and fuel.

"People were investing in ethanol refineries, but then we realized that it takes a lot of petroleum to grow corn and convert it to ethanol," Clarens said. "By the time you get done, you've used almost as much petroleum to make ethanol that you would have if you just put the oil straight into your car."

The research group's plans include conducting demonstration projects for the wastewater production methods. They are also pursuing complementary research on the economic lifecycle of algae compared to other bionenergy feedstocks.

Explore further: NOAA establishes 'tipping points' for sea level rise related flooding

Related Stories

Study finds concerns with biofuels

Mar 31, 2008

Biofuels are widely considered one of the most promising sources of renewable energy by policy makers and environmentalists alike. However, unless principles and standards for production are developed and implemented, certain ...

Wanted: A Viable Arizona Biofuel Crop

Nov 05, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at The University of Arizona are considering various crops for bioenergy production that could be grown in Arizona. Bioenergy is the name given to renewable energy made available ...

Recommended for you

UN sends team to clean up Bangladesh oil spill

4 hours ago

The United Nations said Thursday it has sent a team of international experts to Bangladesh to help clean up the world's largest mangrove forest, more than a week after it was hit by a huge oil spill.

How will climate change transform agriculture?

4 hours ago

Climate change impacts will require major but very uncertain transformations of global agriculture systems by mid-century, according to new research from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Report: Radiation leak at nuclear dump was small

4 hours ago

A final report by independent researchers shows the radiation leak from the federal government's underground nuclear waste repository in southern New Mexico was small and localized.

Confucian thought and China's environmental dilemmas

9 hours ago

Conventional wisdom holds that China - the world's most populous country - is an inveterate polluter, that it puts economic goals above conservation in every instance. So China's recent moves toward an apparent ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

StillWind
5 / 5 (2) Jan 21, 2010
I don't mean to be snarky, but re these the biggest morons on the face of the Earth?
How is the integration of wastewater treatment and algae production not a given?
Algae production has immense promise to not only provide all our liquid fuel needs, but clean up our environment in a way that could dramatically reduce the environmental impact of civilization.
TeeCee
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010
Have to agree entirely with StillWind. Surely it's not beyond the wit of man (read: Politicians) to get our collective shoulder behind this properly. By which I mean, build power plans (preferably CHP) and wastewater treatment plants adjacent, and located suitably close to algal farms - and pipe the liquid and chimmney outputs into the algal production facility. Joined-up planning yes, but scarcely rocket science!
StillWind
not rated yet Jan 21, 2010
Most wastewater treatment plants that I know have acres of land set aside for odor control, that is in no other way being utilized.
It wouldn't even require the purchase of land, only the utilization of what's already setting around.
I'm not much of a government guy, and can't understand why the people developing this technology aren't already working with more municipalities to make this happen. I've read that at least 2 cities are already in the planning stages.
Loodt
1 / 5 (1) Jan 22, 2010
Co-disposal and -treatment is a concept that requires integration of various projects that are usually at different levels of study, completion, and implementation. It sounds lovely on paper but is very difficult to achieve in practice unless you have one client paying for the complete project.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.