Study finds African-Americans bear disproportionate burden of smoking costs in California

Jan 13, 2010

African Americans comprise six percent of the California adult population, yet they account for over eight percent of the state's smoking-attributable health care expenditures and 13 percent of smoking-attributable mortality costs, according to a new analysis by UCSF researchers.

In order to provide an objective picture of the disproportionate of for African American Californians, the UCSF team assessed data from 2002, including health care costs related to and productivity losses from smoking-caused mortality. Study findings are published in the January 2010 issue of the "."

"California has one of the most comprehensive tobacco control programs in the world, and smoking prevalence in the state has been declining steadily as a result. However, not all Californians have benefited equally from these efforts," said lead author Wendy Max, PhD, professor-in-residence of and co-director of the UCSF Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing. "Hopefully these data can be used to strengthen tobacco control programs and smoking cessation efforts throughout African American communities."

Researchers analyzed smoking-attributable costs for diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease, for which incidence is identified in the 2004 US Surgeon General Report as causally related to cigarette smoking. They focused on expenditures for ambulatory care, prescription drugs, inpatient care, and home health care. The team also assessed smoking-attributable mortality for Californians aged 35 years and older using three measures: deaths, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses.

Findings include:

  • African Americans lose more years (16.3) of life per death than other Californians (12.5 years) due to smoking-attributable causes. A total of 3013 African American Californians died of smoking-attributable illness in 2002, representing a loss of over 49,000 years of life and $784 million in productivity.
  • Adult smoking prevalence in 2002 for African Americans was 19.3 percent compared with 15.4 percent for all Californians.
  • The total cost of smoking for the African American community amounted to $1.4 billion in 2002, or $1.8 billion in 2008 dollars.
"It is clear that we need to tailor more tobacco control programs to African Americans in California," said Max. "In addition, there exists a long history of industry promotions and economic support targeted to certain ethnic groups, particularly and Hispanics. I would encourage these communities to carefully consider the benefits of such programs in light of the tremendous economic and human costs."

Explore further: Estimates show preterm birth complications and pneumonia are leading causes of death in children under five years

Provided by University of California - San Francisco

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Pitt study finds inequality in tobacco advertising

Aug 20, 2007

Compared with Caucasians, African-Americans are exposed to more pro-tobacco advertising, according to a University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine study published in this month’s Public Health Reports.

Smoking cessation rates stall

Oct 27, 2006

The number of U.S. smokers -- about 45 million -- in 2005 was the same as in 2004, prompting suggestions that the eight-year tobacco battle has hit a lull.

Recommended for you

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Temple
not rated yet Jan 13, 2010
How is it disproportionate?

One cannot use overall population figures to say that the costs borne are disproportionate. It sounds as if the costs due to smoking are proportionate to the amount of smoking.

If a disproportionate amount of smokers are African American compared to the overall percentage of the population, that doesn't mean they bear a disproportionate cost.

Inside, all our lungs are pink. Until you smoke.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2010
Inside, all our lungs are pink. Until you smoke.
Not really. I love using my pipes but you won't find anything black in my lungs. (Although I love black.)
The imprecise use of the word "smoking" should make us all a bit cautious.

Someone who takes "productivity losses" into consideration but not the economic advantages through "earlier" deaths for pension fonds is just a campaigner.