New research resolves conflict in theory of how galaxies form (w/ Video)

Jan 13, 2010 by Vince Stricherz
These images depict various stages of galaxy formation under the cold dark matter theory using new computer simulations that account for the effects of supernova explosions. Credit: Katy Brooks

(PhysOrg.com) -- For more than two decades, the cold dark matter theory has been used by cosmologists to explain how the smooth universe born in the big bang more than 13 billion years ago evolved into the filamentary, galaxy-rich cosmic web that we see today.

There's been just one problem: the theory suggested most galaxies should have far more stars and at their cores than they actually do. The problem is most pronounced for dwarf galaxies, the most common galaxies in our own celestial neighborhood. Each contains less than 1 percent of the stars found in large galaxies such as the .

Now an international research team, led by a University of Washington astronomer, reports Jan. 14 in Nature that it resolved the problem using millions of hours on supercomputers to run simulations of (1 million hours is more than 100 years). The simulations produced dwarf galaxies very much like those observed today by satellites and large telescopes around the world.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
A movie depicting galaxy formation based on supercomputer simulations using a refined understanding of the cold dark matter theory.

"Most previous work included only a simple description of how and where stars formed within galaxies, or neglected star formation altogether," said Fabio Governato, a UW research associate professor of astronomy and lead author of the Nature paper.

"Instead we performed new , run over several national supercomputing facilities, and included a better description of where and how happens in galaxies."

The simulations showed that as the most massive new stars exploded as supernovas, the blasts generated enormous winds that swept huge amounts of gas away from the center of what would become dwarf galaxies, preventing millions of new stars from forming.

With so much mass suddenly removed from the center of the galaxy, the pull of gravity on the dark matter there is diminished and the dark matter drifts away, Governato said. It is similar to what would happen if our sun suddenly disappeared and the loss of its allowed the Earth to drift off into space.

The cosmic explosions proved to be the missing piece of the puzzle, and adding them to the simulations generated formation of galaxies with substantially lower densities at their cores, closely matching the observed properties of dwarf galaxies.

"The cold dark matter theory works amazingly well at telling where, when and how many galaxies should form," Governato said. "What we did was find a better description of processes that we know happen in the real universe, resulting in more accurate simulations."

The theory of cold dark matter, first advanced in the mid 1980s, holds that the vast majority of the matter in the universe - as much as 75 percent - is made up of "dark" material that does not interact with electrons and protons and so cannot be observed from electromagnetic radiation. The term "cold" means that immediately following the big bang these dark matter particles have speeds far lower than the speed of light.

In the cold dark matter theory, smaller structures form first, then they merge with each other to form more massive halos, and finally galaxies form within the halos.

Explore further: Image: Galactic wheel of life shines in infrared

Related Stories

Cosmologists 'see' the cosmic dawn

Feb 11, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The images, produced by scientists at Durham University's Institute for Computational Cosmology, show the "Cosmic Dawn" - the formation of the first big galaxies in the Universe.

Trick of the light throws up rarely seen dwarf

Mar 16, 2007

A galaxy long considered to be a giant has turned out to be an optical illusion, with new observations by an astronomer from The Australian National University revealing that the star group is a dwarf.

Team Shines Cosmic Light on Missing Ordinary Matter

Jan 07, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- An international team of scientists, led by University of Maryland astronomer Stacy McGaugh, has found that individual galactic objects have less ordinary matter, relative to dark matter, than does the Universe ...

New understanding of the origin of galaxies

Jan 21, 2009

A new theory as to how galaxies were formed in the Universe billions of years ago has been formulated by Hebrew University of Jerusalem cosmologists. The theory takes issue with the prevailing view on how ...

Recommended for you

Image: Galactic wheel of life shines in infrared

2 hours ago

It might look like a spoked wheel or even a "Chakram" weapon wielded by warriors like "Xena," from the fictional TV show, but this ringed galaxy is actually a vast place of stellar life. A newly released ...

New window on the early Universe

Oct 22, 2014

Scientists at the Universities of Bonn and Cardiff see good times approaching for astrophysicists after hatching a new observational strategy to distill detailed information from galaxies at the edge of ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

frajo
1 / 5 (1) Jan 15, 2010
Quite amusing to see the number of comments here in comparison to the number of comments on another article with essentially the same content but the buzz word "dark matter" in its title:
http://www.physor...516.html
Howard
not rated yet Jan 24, 2010
This research is a good example of Big Science sophistry. Dozens of scientists tying together the world's most powerful computers to "prove" (or save)the cold dark matter model by "demonstrating" an unverifiable phenomena which is then taken as validation of the initial conjecture. These authors then arrogantly use their model results to "better constrain" the cold dark matter model! As anyone who has done large-scale simulations knows, given enough computing power and knobs to turn any theory can be "verified". Add to this realistic animations that would make George Lucas proud and a willing public media to disseminate these "new findings" and you have the perpetuation of Big Science myths by Big Science. The truth is that dark matter (and dark energy)is required by the Big Science models to justify Big Science so the "data" will always confirm its existence. But there is a more classical (but dull)explanation for the observations. This is magnetic field energy density.