No limit to pokies problem

Jan 08, 2010
No limit to pokies problem
No chance ... research finds each new poker machine contributes to problem gambling

Problem gamblers are being created at a rate of almost one for every new poker machine introduced, new research has found.

Increasing numbers of poker machines continue to create new problem gamblers, with no "saturation point" ever being reached in a community, new research has found.

Dr Judith Stubbs, an adjunct senior research fellow at the City Futures Research Centre in UNSW’s Faculty of the Built Environment, co-authored a paper, published in the journal International Gambling Studies, which found that problem gamblers were being created at a rate of almost one for every new electronic gaming machine (EGM) placed in the community.

The paper also found that there was no evidence that use of gaming machines slowed or plateaued in a community as more machines were brought into use.

"For every additional EGM placed in a community, an additional 0.8 is created on average," Dr Stubbs said.

"Also, we have not found that we ever reach a saturation point."

Dr Stubbs and co-authors John Storer and Max Abbott based their research on a review of 34 problem gambling surveys conducted in Australia and New Zealand since 1991.

The paper concludes that holding poker machine numbers steady or reducing them could reduce problem gambling issues: "Policies related to restricting or reducing the density of EGMs are likely to play a significant role in containing or reducing gambling-related harms" it stated.

In 2006 there were 200,850 poker machines in Australia, with almost half located in NSW. Figures from Queensland’s Office of Economic and Statistical Research which show gambling was worth $17.6 billion in 2005/06, accounting for 2.9 per cent of Australian household disposable income. Poker machines accounted for 60 per cent of that expenditure.

Explore further: AbbVie to pay Shire $1.64B fee over nixed merger

More information: The paper was produced by Judith Stubbs and Associates and can be viewed here.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

High hopes turn poker machine players into problem gamblers

Aug 14, 2007

There are around 300,000 problem gamblers in Australia. For gambling researchers, one of the biggest questions is why so many people seem unable to control their gambling behaviour, despite the harmful impact on their lives.

Gaming machines affecting well-being

Dec 22, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Electronic gaming machines have a detrimental impact upon the lives of those who use them and their associates, according to new research.

Families suffer from problem gambling

Oct 27, 2009

Many people perceive gambling to be a harmless recreational activity. However, it is estimated that six to eight million people in the United States personally suffer from a gambling related problem. This problem seems to ...

Recommended for you

New MCAT shifts focus, will include humanities

1 hour ago

(HealthDay)—The Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) has been revised, and the latest changes, including more humanities such as social sciences, are due to be implemented next April, according to a report ...

Using feminist theory to understand male rape

12 hours ago

Decades of feminist research have framed rape and sexual assault as a 'women's issue', leaving little room for the experiences of male victims. But a new study published in the Journal of Gender Studies suggests that feminist ...

Simulation-based training improves endoscopy execution

Oct 18, 2014

(HealthDay)—Simulation-based training (SBT) improves clinicians' performance of gastrointestinal endoscopy in both test settings and clinical practice, according to research published in the October issue ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jonnyboy
1 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2010
They didn't research problem gamblers, they researched problem gambler researchers. How accurate can their data possibly be?
freethinking
1 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2010
jannyboy why would you say that?? Just asking