Scientists show 'lifeless' prions capable of evolutionary change and adaptation

Dec 31, 2009

Scientists from The Scripps Research Institute have determined for the first time that prions, bits of infectious protein devoid of DNA or RNA that can cause fatal neurodegenerative disease, are capable of Darwinian evolution.

The study from Scripps Florida in Jupiter shows that prions can develop large numbers of mutations at the protein level and, through natural selection, these mutations can eventually bring about such evolutionary adaptations as drug resistance, a phenomenon previously known to occur only in bacteria and viruses. These breakthrough findings also suggest that the normal - which occurs naturally in human cells - may prove to be a more effective than its abnormal toxic relation.

The study was published in the December 31, 2009 issue of the journal Science Express.

"On the face of it, you have exactly the same process of mutation and adaptive change in prions as you see in viruses," said Charles Weissmann, M.D., Ph.D., the head of Scripps Florida's Department of Infectology, who led the study. "This means that this pattern of Darwinian evolution appears to be universally active. In viruses, mutation is linked to changes in nucleic acid sequence that leads to resistance. Now, this adaptability has moved one level down - to prions and protein folding - and it's clear that you do not need nucleic acid for the process of evolution."

Infectious prions (short for proteinaceous infectious particles) are associated with some 20 different diseases in humans and animals, including and a rare human form, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. All these diseases are untreatable and eventually fatal.
Prions, which are composed solely of protein, are classified by distinct strains, originally characterized by their incubation time and the disease they cause. Prions have the ability to reproduce, despite the fact that they contain no nucleic acid genome.

Mammalian cells normally produce cellular protein or PrPC. During infection, abnormal or misfolded protein - known as PrPSc - converts the normal host prion protein into its toxic form by changing its conformation or shape. The end-stage consists of large assemblies (polymers) of these misfolded proteins, which cause massive tissue and cell damage.

"It was generally thought that once cellular prion protein was converted into the abnormal form, there was no further change," Weissmann said. "But there have been hints that something was happening. When you transmit prions from sheep to mice, they become more virulent over time. Now we know that the abnormal prions replicate, and create variants, perhaps at a low level initially. But once they are transferred to a new host, natural selection will eventually choose the more virulent and aggressive variants."

Drug Resistance

In the first part of the study, Weissmann and his colleagues transferred prion populations from infected brain cells to culture cells. When transplanted, cell-adapted prions developed and out-competed their brain-adapted counterparts, confirming prions' ability to adapt to new surroundings, a hallmark of . When returned to brain, brain-adapted prions again took over the population.

To confirm the findings and to explore the issue of evolution of drug resistance, Weissmann and his colleagues used the drug swainsonine or swa, which is found in plants and fungi, and has been shown to inhibit certain prion strains. In cultures where the drug was present, the team found that a drug-resistant sub-strain of prion evolved to become predominant. When the drug was withdrawn, the sub-strain that was susceptible to swainsonine again grew to become the major component of the population.

Weissmann notes that the findings have implications for the development of therapeutic targets for prion disease. Instead of developing drugs to target abnormal proteins, it could be more efficient to try to limit the supply of normally produced prions - in essence, reducing the amount of fuel being fed into the fire. Weissmann and his colleagues have shown some 15 years ago that genetically engineered mice devoid of the normal prion protein develop and function quite normally (and are resistant to prion disease!).

"It will likely be very difficult to inhibit the production of a specific natural protein pharmacologically," Weissmann said, "You may end up interfering with some other critical physiological process, but nonetheless, finding a way to inhibit the production of normal prion protein is a project currently being pursued in collaboration with Scripps Florida Professor Corinne Lasmezas in our department."

Quasi-Species

Another implication of the findings, according to the study, is that drug-resistant variants either exist in the prion population at a low level prior to exposure or are generated during exposure to the drug. Indeed, the researchers found some prions secreted by infected cells were resistant to the drug before exposure, but only at levels less than one percent.

The scientists show that prion variants constantly arise in a particular population. These variants, or "mutants", are believed to differ in the way the prion protein is folded. As a consequence, prion populations are, in fact, comprised of multiple sub-strains.

This, Weissmann noted, is reminiscent of something he helped define some 30 years ago - the evolutionary concept of quasi-species.
The idea was first conceived by Manfred Eigen, a German biophysicist who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1967. Basically stated, a quasi-species is a complex, self-perpetuating population of diverse and related entities that act as a whole. It was Weissmann, however, who provided the first confirmation of the theory through the study of a particular bacteriophage - a virus that infects bacteria - while he was director of the Institut für Molekularbiologie in Zürich, Switzerland.

"The proof of the quasi-species concept is a discovery we made over 30 years ago," he said. "We found that an RNA virus population, which was thought to have only one sequence, was constantly creating mutations and eliminating the unfavorable ones. In these quasi-populations, much like we have now found in prions, you begin with a single particle, but it becomes very heterogeneous as it grows into a larger population."

There are some unknown dynamics at work in the prion population that leads to this increased heterogeneity, Weissmann added, that still need to be explored.

"It's amusing that something we did 30 years has come back to us," he said. "But we know that mutation and natural selection occur in living organisms and now we know that they also occur in a non-living organism. I suppose anything that can't do that wouldn't stand much of a chance of survival."

Explore further: Three-people IVF debate process on the move in UK

More information: The joint first authors of the Science study, "Darwinian Evolution of Prions in Cell Culture," are Jiali Li and Shawn Browning of The Scripps Research Institute. Other authors include Sukhvir P. Mahal and Anja M. Oelschlegel also of The Scripps Research Institute. Weissmann notes that after the manuscript was accepted by Science, an article by Ghaemmanghami et al. appeared in PLoS Pathogens that described emergence of prions resistant to a completely different drug, quinacrine, providing additional support to the Scripps Research team's conclusions.

Related Stories

Prions show their good side

May 07, 2008

Prions, the infamous agents behind mad cow disease and its human variation, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, also have a helpful side. According to new findings from Gerald Zamponi and colleagues, normally functioning prions prevent ...

Prion propagates in foreign host

Jul 05, 2007

Prions -- infectious, oddly-folded proteins that are the main suspects in fatal neurodegenerative diseases such as Cruetzfeldt-Jakob and bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or "mad cow" -- remain mostly a mystery to scientists. ...

Alzheimer's prevention role discovered for prions

Jul 03, 2007

A role for prion proteins, the much debated agents of mad cow disease and vCJD, has been identified. It appears that the normal prions produced by the body help to prevent the plaques that build up in the brain to cause Alzheimer’s ...

Prions link cholesterol to neurodegeneration

Feb 12, 2008

Prion infection of neurons increases the free cholesterol content in cell membranes. A new study published in the online open access journal BMC Biology suggests that disturbances in membrane cholesterol may be the mechan ...

Recommended for you

Strategy proposed for preventing diseases of aging

6 hours ago

Medicine focuses almost entirely on fighting chronic diseases in a piecemeal fashion as symptoms develop. Instead, more efforts should be directed to promoting interventions that have the potential to prevent ...

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gmurphy
5 / 5 (1) Jan 01, 2010
Very interesting stuff, if a prion is a misfolded protein, how can it reproduce?, is it simply enough to induce folding abnomalities in other proteins?, if evolution is taking place, prions must somehow be able to transfer their characteristics to their progeny, does anyone know how this could happen?
jemapharm
5 / 5 (4) Jan 01, 2010
Generally, the idea is that misfolded proteins act like a template to induce other proteins to take on the same pathological fold. see EMERGING PRINCIPLES OF CONFORMATION-BASED PRION INHERITANCE
Peter Chien, Jonathan S. Weissman, and Angela H. DePace
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Jan 01, 2010
Anything that is able to replicate (in whatever form) should be able to evolve according to darwinian principles. Not really a surprising find. However good job for showing it in the lab.
jimbo92107
5 / 5 (3) Jan 01, 2010
The notion that all life must revolve around DNA seems as silly as assuming that Earth is the only planet in the universe that contains life.
Husky
not rated yet Jan 02, 2010
maybe evolution of a dna-less client, but not without a dna=less host, therefor its interlinked dna dependant.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Jan 02, 2010
Husky: And how do you think DNA got to be around in the first place? Through 'spontaneous creation'? DNA, too, evolved from a DNA-less state (possibly from something very much akin to prions)
Nik_2213
not rated yet Jan 02, 2010
I suspect we're on the way to re-classifying both viruses and prions as 'Alive', albeit parasitical...
superhuman
not rated yet Jan 03, 2010
This is certainly not enough to prove that evolution takes place. These prions may simply react to their surrounding without any persistent adaptation.

For example crystaline salt when placed in water dissolves but this of course doesn't mean that salt molecules evolve and adapt to water. The same may hold for prions - rather then evolve they may simply settle into a conformation most favored by a particular environment they are in.

To show actual evolution they have to prove prions have *persistent* memory - their reaction to a new stimuli has to depend on their whole history as opposed to their last few conditions.
superhuman
not rated yet Jan 03, 2010
I suspect these results can be explained by positive feedback and slow equilibration.

There are many possible conformations in prion population and in some particular conditions some of them are more easily propagating then others. The cell is constantly refolding/degrading prions and at the same time newly created/refolded proteins are being converted into prions.

Since more infectious prions will convert fresh proteins faster their number will be slowly increasing.

Now when a drug is added or prions are moved to a different culture conditions affecting propagation change and different prions become most efficient. This means the composition of the population will start moving in a different direction.

This process can explain all the observations and it's not a Darwinian evolution since no new forms are being created (for that the protein from which prions are made would have to mutate). The whole process works by simply changing the relative abundance of each prion form.
powercosmic
1 / 5 (1) Jan 04, 2010
For Darwinian Evolution to be a fact, its principles would have to be endemic to all phases of "life" and even to "pre-life"

This research shows that it IS, therefore, it is obvious that ascendancy is what the universe does.

For life the mechanism for ascendancy is Evolution by Natural Selection, which will soon be replaced by Evolution by Intelligent Selection or Intelligent Synthesis.
SteveFrey
5 / 5 (3) Jan 05, 2010
Okay the prion theory really needs to be retired now, either that or someone needs to change the definition of adaptation. To suggest that a lifeless object can adapt and evolve is a condradiction of terms, it is more logical to suggest that an organism must be involved in prion related diseases but is in someway preventing it's nucleic acid from being detected than it is to completely redefine life by suggesting that lifeless objects can adapt and evolve. Every definition of adaptation involves life. Prions are life and Science needs to go back to looking for nucleic acid or another means of storing genetic material in prions, it simply has to be there.
Malaclypse
not rated yet Jan 05, 2010
I agree with SteveFrey....to co-mingle an already disputed concept into the prion discussion seems strange.
SteveFrey
not rated yet Jan 05, 2010
I would just like to clarify my previous statements about prions. I said prions are life, this may or may not be true but at a minimum they are the result of a form of life other than the host where they reside. I also said that Science needs to go back to looking for nucleic acid or another means of storing genetic material "in prions" and what I should have said is "in prion related diseases" because the prion is likely not the entity but rather a product of it.
DavidMartin
not rated yet Jan 14, 2010
It doesn't matter whether prions come under our present definition of life, that's just a name. It's clear that they evolve, but it's not clear what the mechanism is, and selection may only be a part of it. DNA was said to be the basis of everything to do with life and evolution, but it's becoming very clear that DNA is less important that we thought - it doesn't seem to pass on instincts for example, and we still don't know what does. And yet every day someone writes an article implying that we know all about these processes. It's the biggest single bias in science - the bias towards the idea that know most of science already. It blocks real progress, by failing to identify the holes in the jigsaw. All the great scientists have started by admitting where the holes are, but others are trying to hide them, for feelings of security or self esteem.