Pension fund switch to decentralized management right way to go, landmark study finds

Dec 15, 2009

As pension funds have grown and become increasingly complex many have turned to using multiple, often pricier specialist managers to steer their investment decisions.

Has it been the right move?

A new study of the British pension fund industry, funded by the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management at the University of Toronto, shows it has, resulting in improved performance.

A team of British and American researchers looked at data from British pension funds between March 1984 and March 2004. Most funds switched from using a balanced management structure, where a manager oversaw a host of asset classes, to a decentralized, specialist management structure, with different managers for each asset class and even multiple specialists within each of those classes.

"Having this huge panel of funds and managers that they were paired with, in all kinds of situations, really allowed us to answer this question of, 'Are these guys getting their money's worth?'" said Russ Wermers, a co-researcher at the University of Maryland.

"We indeed find that specialist performance is not just cheap talk" and the higher management fees specialists charge are in line with better performance, added researcher Allan Timmermann of the University of California.

Using several different pension fund managers can lead to problems with portfolio diversification, because managers may not coordinate their investment decisions with each other. But the study found the use of multiple specialist managers more than made up for that downside through superior stock-selection skills. Pension fund sponsors dealt with coordination and diversification problems by setting lower risk levels for their portfolios. Multiple managers also added an aspect of competition that created incentives towards higher performance.

Pension funds represent a major share of the market. In 2005, pension fund assets amounted to more than $18 trillion U.S., compared to $17 trillion for worldwide mutual fund assets.

This is the first study to look at the effect of different pension structures on performance and risk-taking.

Explore further: When shareholders exacerbate their own banks' crisis

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

'Credit Crunch' Will Hit Retirees in Unequal Ways

Oct 09, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- How severely retirees will be affected by the continuing financial crisis and subsequent "credit crunch" depends to a considerable extent on the kinds of retirement plans they rely on for retirement income, ...

Recommended for you

When shareholders exacerbate their own banks' crisis

Nov 21, 2014

Banks are increasingly issuing 'CoCo' bonds to boost the levels of equity they hold. In a crisis situation, bondholders are forced to convert these bonds into a bank's equity. To date, such bonds have been ...

Trouble with your boss? Own it

Nov 21, 2014

Don't get along with your boss? Your job performance may actually improve if the two of you can come to grips with the poor relationship.

Ethnic diversity reduces risk of market bubbles

Nov 18, 2014

If they consider it at all, investors likely regard ethnic diversity as a matter of social policy. But new research by an MIT Sloan professor suggests a much more practical reason to consider diversity: compared ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

just_doug
not rated yet Dec 15, 2009
I'd love to see how the results would change if the period from 2004-2009 were included. Based on the absence of value added shown in other studies I suspect the specialists' advantage net of fees would be less than zero.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.