Does carbon labelling give developing countries a bad deal?

Nov 24, 2009

Carbon labelling could unfairly disadvantage economies in the developing world, and mislead consumers, according to an interdisciplinary project carried out by the UK Research Councils' Rural Economy and Land Use Programme.

Researchers at the universities of Bangor and Surrey have investigated the wider implications of including details of carbon footprints on food labels. They found that current approaches to carbon labelling may not be an accurate guide to sustainability, and might have serious and unintended consequences for poorer countries.

The team has pinpointed several areas which need to be addressed. They say that schemes often discriminate in the ways they gather information. For example, the figures quoted may declare caused by clearing native forest for agriculture in - while crops from Europe seldom include these, because the land was cleared long ago.

On the other hand, additional carbon sequestered in soil under tree and bush crops commonly grown in developing countries is seldom shown in the .

The researchers emphasise that more accurate databases are needed, in order to ensure that the figures used are fair, and argue that these should be publicly available on a central website, giving detailed information about how they were gathered.

Professor Gareth Edwards-Jones of Bangor University said: "Consultants often come up with numbers without actually visiting the farms or countries involved, so they tend to work with "standard" scenarios. They may even use the same findings to calculate carbon footprints over a large geographical region, thus masking differences between individual countries and farms. It should be made clear exactly how such figures are derived.

"It's also important to include the entire lifecycle of the product, and to give details of how each phase contributes. For example, coffee has a relatively high footprint, but consumers should realise that most of that occurs in the home, when they use energy to prepare their favourite beverage, rather than in the coffee plantation. Signing up our homes to renewable energy tariffs will benefit the planet much more than worrying about the country of origin of our food."

The researchers also suggest ways in which developing countries could reduce their carbon footprint, including processing goods before export. Drying and canning for example, result in products with a longer shelf-life that can be carried by sea, rather than air-freighted, and add value for local producers. The methods employed may also rely more on human labour than on technology, thus using less fossil fuel.

Provided by Bangor University (news : web)

Explore further: US delays decision on Keystone pipeline project

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Why 'Made in China' should increase our carbon footprint

Oct 19, 2007

Nearly a quarter of China's carbon emissions are created by goods manufactured and exported to Western consumers, according to research by University of Sussex climate change analysts Dr Tao Wang and Dr Jim Watson.

Scientists should look at their own carbon footprint

Jun 08, 2009

Scientists studying the impact of climate change on the Arctic need to consider ways to reduce their own carbon footprints, says a researcher who regularly flies north to study the health of caribou.

Carbon measuring system to help mitigate climate change

May 18, 2009

The $9.16m Carbon Benefits Project, which involves the Overseas Development Group at the University of East Anglia (UEA), hopes to encourage sustainable development schemes in developing countries that generate climate adaptation, ...

Recommended for you

US delays decision on Keystone pipeline project

10 hours ago

The United States announced Friday a fresh delay on a final decision regarding a controversial Canada to US oil pipeline, saying more time was needed to carry out a review.

New research on Earth's carbon budget

17 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Results from a research project involving scientists from the Desert Research Institute have generated new findings surrounding some of the unknowns of changes in climate and the degree to which ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

freethinking
3 / 5 (2) Nov 24, 2009
scrap carbon footprint. Carbon footprint is based on scam and fraud science.

I'm suprised Physorg is still putting this junk science here. Until the leaked documents are shown to be false, then all science based on it should be considered false.

http://www.physor...129.html

More news stories

Magnitude-7.2 earthquake shakes Mexican capital

A powerful magnitude-7.2 earthquake shook central and southern Mexico on Friday, sending panicked people into the streets. Some walls cracked and fell, but there were no reports of major damage or casualties.

New research on Earth's carbon budget

(Phys.org) —Results from a research project involving scientists from the Desert Research Institute have generated new findings surrounding some of the unknowns of changes in climate and the degree to which ...

Impact glass stores biodata for millions of years

(Phys.org) —Bits of plant life encapsulated in molten glass by asteroid and comet impacts millions of years ago give geologists information about climate and life forms on the ancient Earth. Scientists ...