New research provides blueprint for molecular basis of global warming

Nov 17, 2009 by Greg Kline
Some common chemical molecules, most of them used industrially, may be more worrisome from a global warming perspective than carbon dioxide, according to a new study by Timothy Lee, chief of the Space Science and Astrobiology Division at NASA Ames Research Center. The study was collaboration between Lee and Joseph Francisco, a Purdue chemistry and earth and atmospheric sciences professor. Credit: Photo courtesy of NASA Ames Research Center

A new study indicates that major chemicals most often cited as leading causes of climate change, such as carbon dioxide and methane, are outclassed in their warming potential by compounds receiving less attention.

Purdue University and NASA examined more than a dozen chemicals, most of which are generated by humans, and have developed a blueprint for the underlying of . The results appear in a special edition of the American Society's Journal of Physical Chemistry A, released Nov. 12.

The compounds, which contain fluorine atoms, are far more efficient at blocking radiation in the "atmospheric window," said Purdue Professor Joseph Francisco, who helped author the study. The atmospheric window is the frequency in the infrared region through which radiation from Earth is released into space, helping to cool the planet. When that radiation is trapped instead of being released, a "" results, warming the globe. Most of the chemicals in question are used industrially, he said.

NASA scientist Timothy Lee, lead author of the study with Francisco and NASA postdoctoral fellow Partha Bera, characterized the fluorinated compounds as having the potential to quickly slam the atmospheric window shut, as opposed to gradually easing it shut like .

In the results, chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur and nitrogen fluorides stood out in their warming potential because of their efficiency to trap radiation in the atmospheric window.

"It's actually rather stark," said Francisco, a Purdue chemistry and earth and atmospheric sciences professor, whose research focuses on the chemistry of molecules in the atmosphere.

An understanding of how the chemicals contribute to climate change on a molecular scale affords the opportunity to create benign alternatives and to test new chemicals for their global warming capability before they go to market, Francisco said.

"Now you have a rational design basis," he said.

The researchers looked at more than a dozen chemicals, often referred to as "greenhouse gases," listed as warming agents by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the most prominent international scientific group monitoring global warming. The study employed both results from experimental observations and from computer modeling using supercomputers from Information Technology at Purdue (ITaP), Purdue's central information technology organization, and NASA. The goal was to determine which chemical and physical properties are most important in contributing to global warming.

"Believe it or not, nobody has ever delineated these properties," Lee said.

CFC use has waned with the discovery that the chemicals contribute to the destruction of Earth's ozone layer, which absorbs most of the dangerous ultraviolet radiation from the sun. But HFCs and PFCs are widely used in air conditioning and the manufacturing of electronics, appliances and carpets. Other uses range from application as a blood substitute in transfusions to tracking leaks in natural gas lines.

"Although current concentrations of some of these trace gases have been found to be substantially small compared to , their concentration is on the rise," the study notes. "With the current rate of increase, they will be important contributors in the future, according to some models."

The fluorine atoms that characterize the chemicals are highly electro-negative and tend to pull electrons to themselves, Francisco said. This shift makes the molecules more efficient at absorbing radiation, which would normally bleed harmlessly into space. As a result, the fluorine-containing compounds are the most effective global warming agents, the study concludes.

The compounds also persist longer than carbon dioxide and other major global warming agents, said Lee, chief of the Space Science and Astrobiology Division at NASA Ames Research Center. The concern is that, even if emitted into the atmosphere in lower quantities, the chemicals might have a powerful cumulative effect over time. Some of these chemicals don't break down for thousands of years.

Source: Purdue University (news : web)

Explore further: Method allows boron atoms to be added to opposing sides of an alkyne molecule

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Toward the design of greener consumer products

Sep 16, 2009

So you're a manufacturer about to introduce a new consumer product to the marketplace. Will that product or the manufacture of the product contribute to global warming through the greenhouse effect?

Scientists discuss carbon dioxide uses

Mar 13, 2006

The use of environmentally friendly carbon dioxide as a refrigerant instead of ozone-depleting chemicals will be discussed at Purdue University this week.

Study Links 'Smog' to Arctic Warming

Mar 14, 2006

NASA scientists have found that a major form of global air pollution involved in summertime "smog" has also played a significant role in warming the Arctic.

Using global warming to create conditions for life on Mars

Feb 03, 2005

Injecting synthetic "super" greenhouse gases into the Martian atmosphere could raise the planet's temperature enough to melt its polar ice caps and create conditions suitable for sustaining biological life. In fact, a team ...

Water vapor confirmed as major player in climate change

Nov 17, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Water vapor is known to be Earth's most abundant greenhouse gas, but the extent of its contribution to global warming has been debated. Using recent NASA satellite data, researchers have estimated ...

Recommended for you

Scientists develop pioneering new spray-on solar cells

17 hours ago

(Phys.org) —A team of scientists at the University of Sheffield are the first to fabricate perovskite solar cells using a spray-painting process – a discovery that could help cut the cost of solar electricity.

Free pores for molecule transport

Jul 31, 2014

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can take up gases similar to a sponge that soaks up liquids. Hence, these highly porous materials are suited for storing hydrogen or greenhouse gases. However, loading of many ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

axemaster
4 / 5 (4) Nov 17, 2009
Before all the skeptics jump in, let me display a quote from the article to you:

"current concentrations of some of these trace gases have been found to be substantially small compared to carbon dioxide"

Translation: The concentration of these chemicals is too small to have much impact right now.

So no, this article isn't saying that carbon dioxide and methane are not the problem. Quite the opposite, it acknowledges them, and then adds some trace chemicals to the mix.
defunctdiety
1 / 5 (1) Nov 17, 2009
The goal was to determine which chemical and physical properties are most important in contributing to global warming.

As with most AGW rhetoric, this is not falsifiable, thereby the study is biased from the outset to determine that there is warming.

I'm not doubting their methods used to determine which compounds contribute most to warming, the point being they are only finding what they set out knowing they'd find, this is not an objective determination that these are significant factors in global temp.

Like CFCs, do these other fluorides accumulate at the poles? Do they have reactive properties with other GHGs or even reflective properties, for instance are they commonly bound to, or accompanied by, aerosols or particulate?

What it really does is just show how woefully incomplete and insufficient our ability to determine the net global heat budget and especially predict it's course is.
frajo
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 18, 2009
this is not falsifiable
Of course, it is falsifiable. You just need to stop the production of these trace gases and you'll see the effect, be it positive or negative.