White House opens Web site programming to public

Oct 25, 2009 By PHILIP ELLIOTT , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- A programming overhaul of the White House's Web site has set the tech world abuzz. For low-techies, it's a snooze - you won't notice a thing.

The online-savvy administration on Saturday switched to open-source code for http://www.whitehouse.gov - meaning the is written in public view, available for public use and able for people to edit.

"We now have a technology platform to get more and more voices on the site," new media director Macon Phillips told The Associated Press hours before the new site went live on Saturday. "This is state-of-the-art technology and the government is a participant in it."

White House officials described the change as similar to rebuilding the foundation of a building without changing the street-level appearance of the facade. It was expected to make the White House site more secure - and the same could be true for other administration sites in the future.

"Security is fundamentally built into the development process because the community is made up of people from all across the world, and they look at the source code from the very start of the process until it's deployed and after," said Terri Molini of Open Source for America, an interest group that has pushed for more such programs.

Having the public write code may seem like a security risk, but it's just the opposite, experts inside and outside the government argued. Because programmers collaborate to find errors or opportunities to exploit Web code, the final product is therefore more secure.

For instance, instead of a dozen administration programmers trying to find errors, thousands of programmers online constantly are refining the programs and finding potential pitfalls.

It will be a much faster way to change the programming behind the Web site. When the model was owned solely by the government, federal contractors would have to work through the reams of code to troubleshoot it or upgrade it. Now, it can be done in the matter of days and free to taxpayers.

Obama's team, which harnessed the Web to win an electoral landslide in 2008 and raise millions, has been working toward the shift since it took office Jan. 20 with a White House site based on technology purchased at the end of President George W. Bush's administration.

It didn't let the tech-savvy Obama team build the new online platform it wanted. For instance, 60,000 watched Obama speech to a joint session of Congress on health care. One-third of those stayed online to talk with administration officials about the speech. But there are limits; the programming used to power that was built for Facebook, the popular social networking Web site.

"We want to improve the tools used by thousands of people who come to WhiteHouse.gov to engage with White House officials, and each other, in meaningful ways," Phillips said.

It's also a nod to Obama's pledge to make government more open and transparent. Aides joked that it doesn't get more transparent than showing the world a code that their is based on.

Under the open-source model, thousands of people pick it apart simultaneously and increase security. It comes more cheaply than computer coding designed for a single client, such as the Executive Office of the President. It gives programmers around the world a chance to offer upgrades, additions or tweaks to existing programs that the White House could - or could not - include in daily updates.

Yet the system - known as Drupal - alone won't make it more secure on its own, cautioned Ari Schwartz of the Center for Democracy and Technology.

"The platform that they're moving to is just something to hang other things on," he said. "They need to keep up-to-date with the latest security patches."

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: Virtual money and user's identity

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Meet the man behind WhiteHouse.gov

Mar 05, 2009

Macon Phillips understands the new media scene, one that combines politics and technology to talk directly to the people. Phillips works for President Barack Obama as the White House's new media director, a new job for an ...

YouTube Limits Cookie Tracking on White House Website

Jan 23, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- With the launch of President Obama's White House website, three days ago, there has been extensive use of YouTube videos on the site. As we all know Google now owns YouTube and tracks every vi ...

White House launches open government initiative

May 21, 2009

The White House invited ordinary Americans on Thursday to contribute ideas on making government more open and unveiled a new website where raw federal data will be put online for public use.

E-mails from public overload House Web site

Aug 14, 2009

(AP) -- Amid a boisterous debate on health care reform, people flooded members of Congress on Thursday with so many e-mails that they overloaded the House's primary Web site.

White House changes email rules

Aug 17, 2009

The White House said Monday it will tighten its email sign-up rules after drawing fire from some recipients of a message about health care policies who complained they had not asked for such updates.

Recommended for you

UN moves to strengthen digital privacy

56 minutes ago

The United Nations on Tuesday adopted a resolution on protecting digital privacy that for the first time urges governments to offer redress to citizens targeted by mass surveillance.

Spotify turns up volume as losses fall

1 hour ago

The world's biggest music streaming service, Spotify, announced Tuesday its revenue grew by 74 percent in 2013 while net losses shrank by one third, in a year of spectacular expansion.

Virtual money and user's identity

7 hours ago

Bitcoin is the new money: minted and exchanged on the Internet. Faster and cheaper than a bank, the service is attracting attention from all over the world. But a big question remains: are the transactions ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Birthmark
Oct 25, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Oct 26, 2009
Drupal is a well known OpenSource CMS (content management system).
Seems someone was afraid to use the key word "Open Source" in the title of the article.
Lucanos
not rated yet Oct 26, 2009
Drupal? One step forward, two steps back...
CSharpner
not rated yet Oct 26, 2009
"White House opens Web site programming to public"

Not quite. Drupel is an open source project, for sure, but you have to register them /them/ and submit updates as a programmer. Your changes are then reviewed by teh Drupal techs and either rejected or accepted. You're NOT changing the White House web site directly. You'd be changing the framework on which the White House's web site runs and you're NOT posting it on the whitehouse web site. The web site web admins will update their software if or when they feel like it. Drupal is simply a /program/ that let's you post "stuff" online. The Whitehouse web site is just one of many sites that use that program.

"meaning the programming language is written in public view, available for public use and able for people to edit."

This is totally wrong on oh so many levels. (continued...)
CSharpner
not rated yet Oct 26, 2009
(continued...)
First, Drupal is NOT a language. It's just a program. Drupal was written in the PHP programming language, but most all languages are "standardized" and not owned by any one company. I don't know what the prior version of the WH site was written in, but it was almost certainly one (or several) of many standardized and "open" languages.

What's different is:
- The WH site now uses a popular content management program.
- The program the WH uses is open source.

Nothing spectacular here. Oh! And nothing is "free to taxpayers" to update the WH's web site's content. They STILL have to pay their employees to to do anything. Just because the base application is free, doesn't mean that everything else is.
k_m
not rated yet Oct 26, 2009
So they pick one of the more vulnerable CMS?
36 vulnerabilities in Drupal 6.x vs 4 for DotNetNuke 5.x :P
Oh wait... e'ryone hates windows. Oh well. Sometimes you get more than you pay for, especially for free.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.