Buying green can be license for bad behavior, study finds

Oct 07, 2009

Those lyin', cheatin' green consumers. Just being around green products can make us behave more altruistically, a new study to be published in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science has found.

But buying those same products can have the opposite effect. Researchers found that buying green can lead people into less altruistic behaviour, and even make them more likely to steal and lie than after buying conventional products. Buying products that claim to be made with low can set up "moral credentials" in people's minds that give license to selfish or questionable behavior.

"This was not done to point the finger at consumers who buy . The message is bigger," says Nina Mazar, a marketing professor at University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management and a self-admitted green consumer. "At the end of the day, if we do one moral thing, IT doesn't necessarily mean we will be morally better in other things as well."

Mazar, along with her co-author Chen-Bo Zhong, an assistant professor of at the Rotman School, conducted three experiments. The first found that people perceived green consumers to be more cooperative, altruistic and ethical than those who purchased conventional products. The second experiment showed that participants merely exposed to products from a green store shared more money in a subsequent experimental game, but those who actually made purchases in that store shared less. The final experiment revealed that participants who bought items in the green store showed evidence of lying and stealing money in a subsequent lab game.

But are people conscious of this moral green washing going on when they buy green products and, more importantly, the license they might feel to break ethical standards? Professors Mazar and Zhong don't know - and look forward to exploring that in further research.

More information: The complete study is available at:… ng/greenproducts.pdf .

Source: University of Toronto (news : web)

Explore further: Poor mother-baby bonding passed to next generation

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Green marketers should take cue from ten commandments

Mar 31, 2009

Companies offering "green" products and services can improve sales by making simple shifts in marketing language, new research from The University of Texas at Austin and the University of South Carolina has demonstrated.

Moderate pay best for job performance, study suggests

Nov 19, 2008

( -- Employers hoping to get the best out of employees with huge performance contingent payments may actually be helping them to do worse, suggests a new paper published by a team of researchers in behavioral ...

Extended service contracts: When and why do people buy them?

Jun 15, 2009

Consumer experts have long recommended against buying Extended Service Contracts (ESCs) with products, since they are rarely cost effective. A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research examines the reasons why so man ...

Recommended for you

Poor mother-baby bonding passed to next generation

47 minutes ago

Trust pathways in the brain are set in infancy and passed on from mother to child, according to landmark UNSW-led research. The work relates to oxytocin levels in new mothers and proves for the first time ...

Lift weights, improve your memory

19 hours ago

Here's another reason why it's a good idea to hit the gym: it can improve memory. A new Georgia Institute of Technology study shows that an intense workout of as little as 20 minutes can enhance episodic ...

Fat chats: The good, the bad and the ugly comments

21 hours ago

Cyberbullying and hurtful 'fat jokes' are disturbingly prevalent in the social media environment, especially on Twitter, says Wen-ying Sylvia Chou of the National Institutes of Health in the US. Chou is lead ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Oct 07, 2009
Much more likely is that these people already posess the character traits that make them take advantage of such "moral" justification as license to do just as they please- be wankers. No indication that any personality asessment testing was done on the subjects beforehand. Again-not science.
4 / 5 (1) Oct 07, 2009
While I don't entirely disagree with you Caliban (is that the band or ravenloft reference?) it doesn't sound like a very rigorous scientific study, this is an easily observable fact of the present day AGW movement. It's only logical that people are much more willing to just slightly change their spending habits than to actually change the way they live if both actions give them the same peace of mind.

And since all the AGW proponents tell people is that they just need to slightly change their spending habits then that is all people believe they need to do to make a difference. And you can't blame people for this, all you can do is change your own life if you are so inclined and try to educate people on how they can change theirs.

And due to the nature of modern living, changing your spending habits can do quite a bit of good, especially when incorporated into other conservationist methods.
1 / 5 (1) Oct 08, 2009
No indication that any personality asessment testing was done on the subjects beforehand.

"Personality" is a function of time, place, biography, inner and outer environment, situation - it changes permanently. Any "personality assessment" is cheating oneself. You only know a human being if you understand that you don't know him.
Oct 08, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.