Large-scale cousin of elusive 'magnetic monopoles' found

Oct 06, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Any child can tell you that a magnet has a "north" and a "south" pole, and that if you break it into two pieces, you invariably get two smaller magnets with two poles of their own. But scientists have spent the better part of the last eight decades trying to find, in essence, a magnet with only one pole. A team working at the National Institute of Standards and Technology has found one.*

In 1931, , one of the rock stars of the physics world, made the somewhat startling prediction that " monopoles," or particles possessing only a single pole—either north or south—should exist. His conclusion stemmed from examining a famous set of equations that explains the relationship between and magnetism. Maxwell's equations apply to long-known electric monopole particles, such as negatively charged and positively charged protons; but despite Dirac's prediction, no one has found particles.

Now, a research team working at NIST's Center for Neutron Research (NCNR), led by Hiroaki Kadowaki of Tokyo Metropolitan University, has found the next best thing. By creating a compound that under certain conditions forms large, molecule-sized monopoles that behave exactly as the predicted particles should, the team has found a way to explore magnetic monopoles in the laboratory, not just on the chalkboard. (Another research team, working simultaneously, published similar findings in Science last month.**)

Magnetic monopoles are created (top) when the spin of an ion in one corner of a spin ice crystal is knocked askew, creating a monopole (red sphere) and adjacent antimonopole (blue sphere). Neutron scattering at the NCNR allowed the team to see the spin ice's transition from its normal state (center) to the monopole state. Monopoles scatter neutrons in a telltale fashion indicated by the red arrows in (bottom.) Credit: NIST

"These are not the monopole particles Dirac predicted—ours are huge in comparison—but they behave like them in every way," says Jeff Lynn, a NIST physicist. "Their properties will allow us to test how theoretical monopole particles should behave and interact."

The team created their monopoles in a compound made of oxygen, titanium and dysprosium that, when cooled to nearly absolute zero, forms what scientists call "spin ice." The material freezes into four-sided crystals (a pyramid with a triangular base) and the magnetic orientation, or "spin," of the ions at each of the four tips align so that their spins are balanced—two spins point inward and two outward. But using neutron beams at the NCNR, the team found they could knock one of the spins askew so that instead three point in, one out … "creating a monopole, or at least its mathematical equivalent," Lynn said.

Because every crystal pyramid shares its four tips with adjacent pyramids, flipping the spin of one tip creates an "anti-monopole" in the next pyramid over. The team has created monopole-antimonopole pairs repeatedly in a relatively large chunk of the spin ice, allowing them to confirm the monopoles' existence through advanced imaging techniques such as neutron scattering.

While the findings will not tell the team where in the universe to search for Dirac's still-elusive magnetic monopole particles, Lynn says that examining the spin ice will permit scientists to test certain predictions about monopoles. "Maxwell's equations indicate that monopoles should obey Coulomb's Law, which indicates their interaction should weaken as distance between them increases," he says. "Using the spin ice crystals, we can test ideas like this."

More information:

* H. Kadowaki, N. Doi, Y. Aoki, Y. Tabata, T.J. Sato, J.W. Lynn, K. Matsuhira and Z. Hiroi. Observation of magnetic monopoles in spin ice. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan,78, No. 10, Oct. 13, 2009. (The team first presented their findings in an invited talk at the International Conference on Neutron Scattering in May 2009.)

** D. J. P. Morris, et al. Dirac strings and magnetic monopoles in spin ice Dy2Ti2O7. Science, online publication Sept. 3, 2009.

Source: National Institute of Standards and Technology (news : web)

Explore further: Neutrino trident production may offer powerful probe of new physics

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Physicists Propose a Method to Observe Dirac Monopoles

Jul 28, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- For decades, scientists have been intrigued by the hypothetical existence of magnetic monopoles - particles with only a north or south magnetic pole, thus having a nonzero magnetic charge. ...

Making magnetic monopoles, and other exotica, in the lab

Feb 05, 2009

Physicist Shou-Cheng Zhang has proposed a way to physically realize the magnetic monopole. In a paper published online in the January 29 issue of Science Express, Zhang and post-doctoral collaborator Xiao-Liang ...

Physics failure could mean success

Jan 25, 2005

It might sound like a bit of a surprise, but a handful of scientists participating in the $4-billion international experiment to discover the Higgs boson, the Holy Grail of particle physics, hope the effort fails. The Large Had ...

Probing a rare material spin state

Sep 14, 2007

A team of international physicists that includes researchers from the National Institute of Standards and Technology has found experimental evidence of a highly sought-after type of arrangement of atomic magnetic moments, ...

Freezing Magnets With Magnets

Mar 14, 2006

A “spin liquid” is a very unique, dynamic material in which each spin – the tiny magnetic field carried by an electron – is not frozen into place, producing clearly defined magnetic regions. Instead, the spins are ...

Recommended for you

How did evolution optimize circadian clocks?

Sep 12, 2014

(Phys.org) —From cyanobacteria to humans, many terrestrial species have acquired circadian rhythms that adapt to sunlight in order to increase survival rates. Studies have shown that the circadian clocks ...

High Flux Isotope Reactor named Nuclear Historic Landmark

Sep 12, 2014

The High Flux Isotope Reactor, or HFIR, now in its 48th year of providing neutrons for research and isotope production at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory, has been designated a Nuclear ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Alexa
Oct 06, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Nik_2213
Oct 06, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
magpies
Oct 06, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
bluehigh
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 07, 2009
What is an anti-monopole? Do they mean that the 2 opposite magnetic fields are separated in space? Is this actually a mono anything, if it only co-exists with a manifestation of the opposite field trapped in a crystal lattice?
toyo
Oct 07, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Alexa
not rated yet Oct 07, 2009
Rather then just about monopoles we should talk about free ends of long, noodle-like dipoles.

http://images.iop...ole1.jpg

(image of Dirac strings from original article)
Alexa
not rated yet Oct 07, 2009
What is an anti-monopole?
It's the second end of Dirac string, forming monopole pair.
otto1923
not rated yet Oct 07, 2009
Heres a question:
Rosy Teh, Khai-Ming Wong
(Submitted on 9 Jun 2004 (v1), last revised 28 Apr 2005 (this version, v4))
Abstract: The SU(2) Yang-Mills-Higgs theory supports the existence of monopoles, antimonopoles, and vortex rings. In this paper, we would like to present new exact static antimonopole-monopole-antimonopole (A-M-A) configurations. The net magnetic charge of these configurations is always negative one, whilst the net magnetic charge at the origin is always positive one for all positive integer values of the solution's parameter $m$. However, when $m$ increases beyond one, vortex rings appear coexisting with these A-M-A configurations. The number of vortex rings increases proportionally with the value of $m$. They are located in space where the Higgs field vanishes along rings.
'where the Higgs field vanishes...' -does something at this location lose mass??
mattytheory
not rated yet Oct 12, 2009
^If the Higgs field is the mechanism by which particles have mass, then the asbence of such a field would imply that mass is no longer there, right?