Stanford analyses of flu pandemics project savings from earlier vaccinations

Oct 05, 2009

In a city the size of New York, starting a vaccination campaign a few weeks earlier could save almost 600 lives and over $150 million, according to a study by scientists at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

The study, to be published online Oct. 6 in the , modeled a pandemic in a hypothetical urban area with a population and demographic characteristics mirroring New York City's.

It concluded that under a very broad range of assumptions, vaccinating this October would save more money and lives than in November, and that vaccinating at either time was better than no campaign at all. An October campaign would avert 2,051 deaths and save $469 million, while a November campaign would prevent 1,468 deaths and save $302 million relative to doing nothing.

"To put it simply, the most cost-saving and life-saving strategy is to vaccinate as many people as possible as soon as possible," said the study's first author, Nayer Khazeni, MD, an instructor of medicine in pulmonary and critical care. She is also an associate at Stanford's Center for Health Policy and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research.

Citing New York City's 1976 mass-vaccination program against , the investigators presumed that a substantial fraction of the city's population could be reached in a 10-day campaign. Their sophisticated incorporated numerous alternative assumptions regarding the new viral strain's lethality and transmission rate, the vaccine's effectiveness and side-effect profile and the likelihood that people would limit their social contacts as cases multiplied.

Public health officials have noted that it may not be possible to provide H1N1 vaccine on a mass scale in October. Earlier in the summer, up to 120 million doses of vaccine were expected to be ready in mid-October, enough to inoculate 40 percent of the U.S. population. Although the projected number of doses available by then has been scaled back to 45 million, enough for 15 percent of the U.S population, the study makes a compelling case for the benefits of vaccinating sooner rather than later.

Avoiding hospitalizations, for instance, provides a huge financial payoff, according to the study's senior author Douglas Owens, MD, senior investigator at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and professor of medicine and of health research and policy at the medical school. "A two-week stay in an intensive care unit could cost well over $50,000," said Owens. "You can vaccinate a lot of people for that much."

To date, H1N1 vaccines appear to have no serious . But even when the researchers programmed their mathematical model with an assumption of substantial vaccine side effects, they found that far more lives and dollars would be saved than lost by a mass-vaccination campaign. For example, under the conservative assumption that the H1N1 vaccine's safety profile would closely resemble that of the one used in the national swine-flu of 1976, side effects would cause only two deaths in a city the size of New York City if 40 percent of the population were vaccinated.

"That's about 0.1 percent of the lives that would be saved," Khazeni noted. "And even if vaccine side effects occurred far more often, many lives would still be saved by the campaign for every life lost due to side effects."

The Stanford investigators' mathematical model-developed by co-author David Hutton, a graduate student in management science and engineering under Owens' direction-can be used to look at other scenarios that might become relevant in the future. For example, a new vaccination strategy would be needed to cope with a pandemic caused by the H5N1 strain of influenza, commonly referred to as avian flu. That extremely virulent strain was, until the onset of the H1N1 pandemic early this year, the primary concern of public-health authorities anticipating an influenza pandemic. All it would take to ignite a dangerous pandemic is a random mutation that substantially increased H5N1's transmissibility among humans.

A hypothetical vaccination campaign targeting the H5N1 viral strain is the subject of a second study, also undertaken by Khazeni and Owens and their Stanford colleagues, appearing simultaneously in the same journal. This study models the efficacy of an H5N1-directed public-health campaign, once again in a municipality resembling New York City, and examines the extensive stockpiling of vaccines and antiviral drugs (such as Tamiflu and Relenza) and their widespread distribution for preventive use at the onset of a local outbreak.

Unlike the H1N1 vaccine, studies show, a vaccine targeting the H5N1 strain would require two vaccine doses and would need an immune response-boosting substance called an adjuvant in order to induce strong human immune responses. The adjuvant would also lower the required individual dose size by as much as 45-fold, thereby multiplying total available doses by that amount.

Supplies of adjuvant and antivirals in the federal government's Strategic National Stockpile should be expanded, Khazeni said. Those stockpiles would not only be useful against H5N1, but could also be directed toward use against other influenza strains with pandemic potential that may arise at any time.

Added Owens: "Just because we've had H1N1 doesn't mean we won't have something else."

Source: Stanford University Medical Center (news : web)

Explore further: Liberia holds Senate vote amid Ebola fears

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Vaccines tested for use against bird flu

Mar 31, 2006

Human testing on a two potential vaccines against the H5N1 strain of bird flu has begun in Germany and Belgium, according to GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Scientist warns over pandemic flu vaccine 6-month time lag

Apr 27, 2009

New research published today (Monday April 27) from the University of Leicester and University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust warns of a six-month time lag before effective vaccines can be manufactured in the event of a ...

Bird flu vaccine protects people and pets

Oct 20, 2008

A single vaccine could be used to protect chickens, cats and humans against deadly flu pandemics, according to an article published in the November issue of the Journal of General Virology. The vaccine protects birds and ma ...

Recommended for you

Liberia holds Senate vote amid Ebola fears

1 hour ago

Health workers manned polling stations across Liberia on Saturday as voters cast their ballots in a twice-delayed Senate vote that has been criticized for its potential to spread the deadly Ebola disease.

Evidence-based recs issued for systemic care in psoriasis

21 hours ago

(HealthDay)—For appropriately selected patients with psoriasis, combining biologics with other systemic treatments, including phototherapy, oral medications, or other biologic, may result in greater efficacy ...

Bacteria in caramel apples kills at least four in US

22 hours ago

A listeria outbreak believed to originate from commercially packaged caramel apples has killed at least four people in the United States and sickened 28 people since November, officials said Friday.

Steroid-based treatment may answer needs of pediatric EoE patients

22 hours ago

A new formulation of oral budesonide suspension, a steroid-based treatment, is safe and effective in treating pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), according to a new study in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the official clinical practice journal ...

Discovery of genes that predispose a severe form of COPD

Dec 19, 2014

A study by Ramcés Falfán-Valencia, researcher at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (INER), found that the mestizo Mexican population has a number of variations in certain genes that predispose ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.