# Study: Why the best soccer teams don't always win

##### Oct 01, 2009 by Lin Edwardsweblog

(PhysOrg.com) -- A recent study, published in the October edition of the Journal of Applied Statistics, looked at soccer as being an experiment to determine which of two teams is superior, but their analysis found a high statistical probability that the best team might not win.

The study, carried out by Gerald Skinner and Guy Freeman from the University of Maryland, used a Bayesian approach to analyze the games in various types of competitions, including the 2006 World Cup.

The authors proposed that if the games really did reveal which team was best, an intransitive triplet could not occur. (This is where team A plays B and wins, then team B plays C and wins, and finally team C plays A and wins.)

The analysis of the scores of the 2006 World Cup games found that intransitive triplets occurred in 17% of the 355 triplets, which is not much better than the expected random result of 25%. The initial stages basically represent repeated experiments and should produce a more reliable result, according to the study's authors, but the knockout rounds played by the 16 winning teams are not like repeated experiments, and therefore the results are not reliable. The analysis found that in 2006 the best team had only a 28% chance of winning.

The study suggests that a level of confidence could not be obtained unless the game was changed radically, but the idea the authors propose, of having the game continue in extra time until the goal difference is large enough to yield an adequate level of confidence is not workable.

Fans of the 'beautiful game' may also actually like the idea of not knowing for certain which team was going to win anyway.

More information: Journal of Applied Vol. 36, No. 10, October 2009, 1087-1095, 10.1080/02664760802715922
Also available: arXiv:0909.4555v1

## Related Stories

#### Better baseball -- Choosing the champs

Jul 30, 2007

How many games does it take to ensure that the best team in a sports league ends up with the best record? According to a study by a pair of physicists at the Los Alamos national Laboratory in New Mexico, the answer is an ...

#### Sports Leagues Not Efficiently Structured, Scientists Say

Aug 30, 2007

According to a pair of statistical physicists, sports leagues as they are typically set up – with each team playing an equal number of games and the one with the most wins declared league champion – too often allow a ...

#### The first goal is the deepest: Can mathematics predict the match outcome?

Jun 02, 2009

Jack Brimberg and Bill Hurley of The Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, point out that sports commentators will often argue the importance of scoring the first goal and often suggest that a team improves ...

#### Statistically 'Proven'! Germany Will Be Next Soccer World Champion

Feb 22, 2006

For some people soccer is a game of pure chance. Metin Tolan confronts the emotions in the stadium with statistical calculations. The professor for experimental physics at the Universität Dortmund says, ...

#### Who’s in first? Physicists develop new football ranking system

Nov 08, 2005

Physicists at the University of Michigan devised a new way to rank college football teams that is fast and can be easily understood by fans.

#### Hertfordshire team wins Humanoid Simulation League in Robot Football Cup

May 06, 2009

The Bold Hearts, a student team from the University of Hertfordshire, has just won the Humanoid Simulation League in the Robocup German Open 2009.  The team is now preparing for the Robocup World Championships in Austria, ...

## Recommended for you

#### Alternate theory of inhabitation of North America disproved

2 hours ago

There has long been a debate among scholars about the origins of the first inhabitants of North America. The most widely accepted theory is that sometime before 14,000 years ago, humans migrated from Siberia ...

#### Researcher collects leadership insights from 'Transformers'

2 hours ago

New research by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Peter Harms shows there is more than meets the eye when it comes to the impact of Saturday morning cartoons.

#### Collin Burns in 5.253 seconds sets Rubik's Cube time record (w/ Video)

4 hours ago

Collin Burns took part in a Rubik's Cube competition at a high school in Doylestown, Pennsylvania, over the weekend. The event is recognized as an official World Cube Association competition. He solved the ...

#### Google searches for 'n-word' associated with black mortality

6 hours ago

Google searches could unveil patterns in Black mortality rates across the US, according to a new University of Maryland study. Researchers found that those areas with greater levels of racism, as indexed ...

#### Bizarre 'platypus' dinosaur discovered

6 hours ago

Although closely related to the notorious carnivore Tyrannosaurus rex, a new lineage of dinosaur discovered in Chile is proving to be an evolutionary jigsaw puzzle, as it preferred to graze upon plants.

#### Is the universe a hologram?

7 hours ago

Describing the universe requires fewer dimensions than we might think. New calculations show that this may not just be a mathematical trick, but a fundamental feature of space itself.

##### freemind
Oct 01, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
##### acarrilho
Oct 01, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
##### nanotech_republika_pl
1 / 5 (1) Oct 01, 2009
That's exactly right: soccer is really exciting to watch also because the outcome is more random, more than many other sports like baseball or NFL football.
##### defunctdiety
5 / 5 (1) Oct 01, 2009
...soccer is really exciting to watch...

I can't believe you have this point of view and still call it soccer... isn't that some sort of cardinal sin?
4 / 5 (1) Oct 01, 2009
Any footer fan will say this is blindingly obvious.
Players often get injured, coaches experiment, refs can make bad calls, the lads can have a night out before the game, monte zumas revenge, ... the list goes on.
Clearly these sporadic events can influence the outcome. Score is a poor metric of a quality. I would want to see more frequent metrics like possession time, shots on goal, passing success.
##### freethinking
1 / 5 (3) Oct 04, 2009
I use to be a leader of a boys group. During game time I often placed all the best players on one team and all the poor players on the other. It always amazed me how the poor players kept up with and often beat the better players. What I observed was that the good players tended to play as an individual, while the poor players kept passing the ball to other team members.

I also coached a first grade basketball team (perfect season) our goal was that everyone would get a basket during the season and purposly told the better players to pass the ball to weaker players to achieve this. The other teams couldnt figure this out. They knew who the better players were and guarded them, but our good players passed to weaker players and they scored.
I think poorer teams can beat better teams if they play as a team.
##### trantor
not rated yet Oct 05, 2009
in typical american fashion, the article was illustrated with a photo of women football.
##### stoopid_rednek
not rated yet Oct 06, 2009
While it's true that "minnows" often have the opportunity to knock off the elite squads from time to time, over the long run quality, especially quality of depth, will allow the better teams to rise to the top year after year. The English Premiere League is a prime example as the "Big Four"--Arsenal, Manchester United, Liverpool, and Chelsea--routinely vie for the premiere league's championship. However, in response to the interesting study, the FA Cup, an all-league tournament open to the smallest teams as well as the top leagues, includes many exciting and unforeseen upsets that make every game a potential, "for-all-time" event that local fans will recall for decades. That's one reason why I love to watch whatever games are broadcast in the States.