Research finds that chatspeak has no impact on children's spelling ability

Sep 21, 2009 By Jamie Hanlon

(PhysOrg.com) -- Parents, get ready to say OMG and watch your teens roflol.

This will prolly comes as a bit of a shock to UR system, but findings from a group of University of Alberta researchers show that the language commonly used in instant messaging has no effect on your child's abilities. If anything, says study author Connie Varnhagen, using language variations commonly used in instant messaging and texting is actually a good sign.

Varnhagen's findings come from a class-based study that was recently published in Reading and Writing. A group of third-year psychology students proposed and designed a study to test whether new Simple , or SMS, language - also known as chatspeak - which refers to the abbreviations and slang commonly used when , emailing or chatting online, had an influence on students' spelling habits. The group surveyed roughly 40 students from ages 12 to 17. The participants were asked to save their instant messages for a week. At the end of the study, the participants completed a standardized spelling test.

Students' use of chatspeak is only one shared concern between parents and educators about children's spelling abilities. But, with a growing usage of connected resources such as Skype, Facebook and Twitter, understanding the relationship between this virtual dialect and use of the Queen's English is of significant importance.

While the researchers expected there to be some correlation between poor spelling and chatspeak, Varnhagen said they were pleasantly surprised by the results.

"Kids who are good spellers [academically] are good spellers in instant messaging," she said. "And kids who are poor spellers in English class are poor spellers in ."

What was surprising, though, was how chatspeak use and spelling played in the battle of the sexes. Girls used more chatspeak than boys, who preferred to express themselves through repeated use of punctuation. However, the study found that boys who used chatspeak and abbreviations more frequently were poorer spellers. Conversely, girls who used more abbreviations were better spellers than girls who did not use many abbreviations in their messages.

Nicole Pugh, a student researcher and one of the study's co-authors, was amazed at the complexity and volume of chatspeak that the students were using.

"Going through the participant conversations, it was interesting to note how many new words that children are using online," said Pugh. "We would have to decipher the meaning of the language with online dictionaries or by asking younger siblings."

Varnhagen and Pugh both agree that the results of their study should ease some concerns and even open up discussion on how this language can be perhaps be embraced within an educational or academic context.

"If you want students to think very precisely and concisely and be able to express themselves, it might be interesting to have them create instant messages with ideas, maybe allow them opportunities to use more of this new dialect in brief reports or fun activities," said Varnhagen. "Using a new type of does require concentration and translating it to standard English does require concentration and attention. It's a little brain workout."

Provided by University of Alberta (news : web)

Explore further: Oceans apart: Study reveals insights into the evolution of languages

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Instant messaging -- a new language?

May 01, 2008

For many adults over the age of 30, the former groupings of letters would seem incoherent, but for a newer generation of technologically-savvy young adults it can say a lot.

Me little late meeting sorry sorry

Jun 27, 2006

The newest language for mobile text messaging looks like hieroglyphics and sounds like a caveman. The language is Zlango, and its creators aim to inject whimsy and emotion into text messaging while reducing ...

When texting, eligible women express themselves better

Feb 10, 2009

The book "Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus" and its gender stereotypes on how the sexes communicate remains fodder for debate, but two Indiana University researchers have confirmed one thing: When men ...

Recommended for you

Modern population boom traced to pre-industrial roots

11 hours ago

The foundation of the human population explosion, commonly attributed to a sudden surge in industrialization and public health during the 18th and 19th centuries, was actually laid as far back as 2,000 years ...

Researcher looks at the future of higher education

11 hours ago

Most forecasts about the future of higher education have focused on how the institutions themselves will be affected – including the possibility of less demand for classes on campus and fewer tenured faculty members as ...

Now we know why it's so hard to deceive children

12 hours ago

Daily interactions require bargaining, be it for food, money or even making plans. These situations inevitably lead to a conflict of interest as both parties seek to maximise their gains. To deal with them, ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shadouness
1 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2009

I still don't believe it. The experiment dealt on correlation between their ability to spell, or on their "spelling habits", but not on its future impact to their spelling ability. I believe it AT LEAST stunts spelling ability. Example, if someone were a bad speller, he wouldn't bother finding out the correct spelling of something because he thinks he can get away with it through chat~/text~/leetspeak.

The statement, "'Kids who are good spellers [academically] are good spellers in instant messaging... And kids who are poor spellers in English class are poor spellers in instant messaging'" only means THAT. It doesn't mean that poor spellers COULDN'T have improved their ability to spell because of chatspeak. [I believe they COULD have improved their spelling without the help of chatspeak.]
Velanarris
not rated yet Sep 22, 2009
The experiment dealt on correlation between their ability to spell, or on their "spelling habits", but not on its future impact to their spelling ability. I believe it AT LEAST stunts spelling ability.


If your style of writing determines your ability to write then we should stop studying Shakespearian/Victorian English as it's a completely different vein and will cause the downfall of current American English standards.

Or you could jsut be projecting that you don't like it when people "typ lik dis."

Think about how chatspeak assists future court reporters who live in a method of shorthand similar to "chatspeak".