# Professor discovers new way to calculate body's 'Maximum Weight Limit'

##### Sep 18, 2009

Most of us are familiar with the term, Body Mass Index, or BMI, as an index to determine healthy body weight. But, calculating BMI involves a complex formula: weight in pounds is multiplied by 703, and then divided by height in inches squared. Charts or online calculators are then used to show a "healthy weight range" given an individual's height that corresponds to the "healthy range BMI." For example, a BMI chart indicates that a healthy range BMI of 19 to 24 translates to a "healthy weight range" of 120 to 150 pounds for a 5-foot, 6-inch individual.

If this sounds way too complicated to you, you're not alone. George Fernandez, a professor of applied statistics and director of the Center for Research Design and Analysis at the University of Nevada, Reno, set out to give people a simpler way of calculating their healthy weight, and one that wouldn't require charts or online calculators. In addition, he doesn't think the "range" approach sticks in individuals' minds.

"We need a "Maximum Weight Limit, or MWL," he said, "one number that we know we can't go over, just like a speed limit."

So, using SAS software and statistical procedures, he discovered a much simpler way of calculating a Maximum Weight Limit, which closely corresponds to weight recommendations listed on charts. But, you don't need to calculate or know your BMI, nor do you need a chart or online calculator to figure out your Maximum Weight Limit. Fernandez will present his Maximum Weight Limit calculation at the Nevada Public Health Association Conference on Sept. 22 at the University of Nevada, Reno's Joe Crowley Student Union.

"It's a very simple calculation that most of us can do in our heads," he explained. For men and women, there is a baseline height and weight. For men, the baseline is 5-feet, 9-inches tall and a Maximum Weight Limit of 175 pounds, meaning that a 5-foot, 9-inch tall man should weigh no more than 175 pounds. For women, the baseline is 5-feet tall and a Maximum Weight Limit of 125 pounds.

"These are nice round numbers that people can easily remember: 5-feet, 9-inches tall, 175 pounds for man; and 5-feet tall, 125 pounds for a woman," explained Fernandez.

From that starting point, you simply calculate how much taller or shorter you are, in inches. Then, if you are man, you add or subtract 5 pounds for every inch you are taller or shorter than 5 feet, 9 inches. So, if you are 5-feet, 11-inches tall, you are 2 inches taller than the baseline of 5 feet, 9 inches. You add 5 pounds for each of those 2 inches, 10 pounds, to the baseline Maximum Weight Limit of 175. So, your Maximum Weight Limit is 185 (175 pounds plus 10 pounds). Women add or subtract 4.5 pounds for each inch they differ from the baseline height of 5-feet tall.

These Maximum Weight Limits correspond very closely to BMIs of 25.5 for men and 24.5 for women. A BMI of 18.5 to 25 BMI is diagnosed as the "healthy range." Fernandez used a slightly lower BMI base for women and a slightly higher one for men because, on average, women have less muscle mass than men. Although some have debated using BMI as a means for calculating healthy weight because it does not take into account factors such as muscle mass, for example, it has been shown to work as a basis for calculating a healthy weight for more than 90 percent of the population and is the most universally used index in weight management programs.

"Now people can calculate their own Maximum Weight Limit, based on the BMI index, but without any calculators or charts," Fernandez said. "And, all they have to remember is that one number, 185 pounds for example, which is easier for most people than retaining a weight range, such as 155 to 185 pounds."

Fernandez also noted that this simple formula could be very useful in medically underserved areas of the world, and for individuals without access to technology and charts.

"Anyone, anywhere can calculate their Maximum Limit if they know their and this simple formula," he said. "People can calculate this in their heads and remember this."

Explore further: From beef tongue to beef on weck, menus tell culinary story

## Related Stories

#### Number of severely obese people increasing

Apr 10, 2007

The number of Americans 100 pounds or more overweight increased 50 percent from 2000 to 2005, twice as fast as moderately obese people.

#### Many women add too many pounds during pregnancy

May 28, 2009

(AP) -- Eating for two? New guidelines are setting how much weight women should gain during pregnancy - surprisingly little if they're already overweight or obese when they conceive.

#### Study: Lose big weight, gain big cash

Jul 07, 2005

People who lose a lot of weight tend to fatten their pocketbooks, Ohio State University researchers say.

#### Weight gain may be healthy when it comes to type 1 diabetes

Jun 07, 2008

Gaining body fat may be a good thing, at least for people with type 1 diabetes, say researchers at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. Their study, being presented at the 68th Scientific Sessions ...

#### Study shows weight bias is as prevalent as racial discrimination

Mar 27, 2008

Discrimination against overweight peopleâ€”particularly womenâ€”is as common as racial discrimination, according to a study by the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity at Yale University.

#### Breaking a sweat helps control weight gain over 20 years

Nov 05, 2007

Don't slack off on exercise if you want to avoid packing on the pounds as you age.

## Recommended for you

#### From beef tongue to beef on weck, menus tell culinary story

10 hours ago

Before beef on weck and chicken wings became staples of the city's restaurants, there was beef tongue and woodcock.

#### Key to better sex ed: Focus on gender & power

12 hours ago

A new analysis by Population Council researcher Nicole Haberland provides powerful evidence that sexuality and HIV education programs addressing gender and power in intimate relationships are far more likely ...

#### Journal tackles aging policy issues raised by White House

12 hours ago

In anticipation of the forthcoming 2015 White House Conference on Aging (WHCoA), The Gerontological Society of America (GSA) has produced a special issue of The Gerontologist that outlines a vision for older adults' econom ...

#### New research finds smoking and mother's genetics combine to increase likelihood of twins

15 hours ago

African American mothers who smoke and have a genetic profile that includes a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the TP53 gene have an increased likelihood of having twins, concluded a team of researchers from the University ...

#### Artificial meat tipped to flood low-end market

15 hours ago

Steaks and chops could be pushed to the high-end of the meat market in future, with artificial meats supplying the bulk, cheap end, research suggests.

#### Convenience, workplace incentives may increase use of public transit

15 hours ago

Transit stops close to home and workplace incentives are associated with higher likelihood that commuters will choose public transportation, according to research from the Brown School at Washington University ...

##### Fazer
not rated yet Sep 18, 2009
I like the fact that he is simplifying the calculations, but this whole weight thing seems so silly. I am keeping my weight down because I feel better, but check this out:

I am 6'1", so I am 4 inches taller than the baseline. 4x5lbs=20lbs. 175lbs+20lbs=195lbs.

Fine, so I need to be 195lbs or less to be at a "normal" weight, but I just dropped down past 200lb recently and everyone remarks at how skinny I look. I have no idea how I can take any more weight off to be in the "healthy" range. I'll be skin and bones!

I don't work out or run. I do walk a lot and have always been a fast walker, so my legs are lean and somewhat muscular, but not excessively so.

I just don't get it. Maybe I have rocks for brains.
##### deatopmg
1 / 5 (1) Sep 18, 2009
WHy is it that 50 yrs ago weights were based on body type, normal, ectomorph, and mesomorph. Now (and for a Very long time)these are all lumped together into 1 calculation?

Another problem is the calculation appears to be arbitrary giving a "healthy" weight but NOT the healthiest weight,i.e. the lowest mortality - which studies (some reported in physorg)have shown to be in the slightly overweight range.