'Eatin' (not so) good in the neighborhood'

Sep 01, 2009

Living without a car in close proximity to fast food restaurants is associated with excess body mass index and weight gain, according to a University of Pittsburgh study available online and published in the September issue of the Journal of Urban Health. Indeed, adults in areas with high fast food concentration who didn't have a car were as much as 12 pounds heavier than those who lived in neighborhoods that lacked such restaurants.

"Owning a car is generally associated with a more and excess weight gain because people spend more time in their cars and less time walking," said Sanae Inagami, M.D., study lead author and assistant professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Yet, when Inagami and her colleagues looked at whether a high concentration of restaurants impacted this association, they found that not owning a car in areas where fast food was more readily available increased the risk of .

"Fast food may be specific to weight gain in particular populations and locations," she said. "People who are less affluent don't own cars and can't go distances for healthier foods. As a result, they may end up opting for the lower-priced and high caloric foods available at fast food chains."

The study, part of the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Study, was based on a survey of 2,156 adults in 63 neighborhoods in Los Angeles County. Car owners on average weighed 8.5 pounds more than non-car owners except in areas with high fast food concentration, meaning five fast food restaurants per mile. Non-car owners in high fast food concentration areas were found to weigh 2.7 pounds more than car owners who lived in the same areas, and 12 pounds more than residents of areas without fast food outlets. Those who did not own a and lived in areas without fast food outlets weighed the least.

"There has been a major focus on fast food and its impact on individual health, but we need to consider the availability of all types of restaurants at individual and community levels," said Inagami. "Since our study showed that total restaurant density was associated with weight gain in all individuals, not just those who did not own cars, we also need to encourage people to pay more attention to their food environment," she said.

More information: Link to study: www.springerlink.com/content/f… 9765065/fulltext.pdf

Source: University of Pittsburgh

Explore further: Preterm children's brains can catch up years later

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Local food environments can lead to obesity

Jun 18, 2009

Living in an area with more fast food outlets and convenience stores than supermarkets and grocers has been associated with obesity in a Canadian study. Researchers writing in the open access journal BMC Public Health have s ...

Recommended for you

Preterm children's brains can catch up years later

4 hours ago

There's some good news for parents of preterm babies – latest research from the University of Adelaide shows that by the time they become teenagers, the brains of many preterm children can perform almost as well as those ...

Mortality rates increase due to extreme heat and cold

4 hours ago

Epidemiological studies have repeatedly shown that death rates rise in association with extremely hot weather. The heat wave in Western Europe in the summer of 2003, for example, resulted in about 22,000 extra deaths. A team ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

moj85
not rated yet Sep 01, 2009
Increase in just obesity? Or is there an increase in obesity-related metabolic diseases? It would be interesting to know if the increase in obesity also came with higher morbidity or more cases of diabetes. Walking help reduce these issues?
danman5000
not rated yet Sep 01, 2009
Some of these "studies" really surprise me. Did we actually need someone to tell us that living near fast food restaurants with no easy way to get away from them leads to obesity? Also that less affluent families "may end up opting for the lower-priced and high caloric foods available at fast food chains." No, really? And here I thought poor people ate caviar and drank champagne on a daily basis. How do you get funding for this sort of thing? I'm going to propose a study on the dependence of fish on water and see if these guys will pay for it.