Should females trust showy males?

Aug 21, 2009
Should females trust showy males?

(PhysOrg.com) -- How honest are males when using sexual displays to signal their eligibility to females?

Research by evolutionary biologists at the universities of Glasgow and Exeter suggests females should be wary of initial flashy displays which may not have staying power.

A male animal’s sexual signals, such as his song or bright colouration are an attempt to attract females. Since these displays demand considerable effort to produce, a louder or brighter display is meant to indicate that the male is in good condition. But can females trust these signals to be a reliable indication of the male’s quality?

A team of researchers led by Dr Jan Lindström at the University of Glasgow have found that the honesty of the signal can vary dramatically over time, depending on both the condition of the male and the likelihood of him obtaining future matings. The research suggests it may pay females to wait until ‘dishonest’ have exhausted themselves in producing a flashy signal that they cannot sustain.

, Dr Lindström said: “Honesty in males mostly depends on how many opportunities there are to breed. If males can breed now but the future promises little in terms of further matings, all males should immediately reveal their ‘true colours’ - so that the signals they produce are a reliable indication of their quality. But if males can potentially breed several times over the course of a breeding season, it pays those in best condition to keep some of their strength in reserve.

“In contrast, those males in poorer condition cannot afford to delay seeking a mate, so must signal as hard as they can - with the result that at the start of the breeding season a female cannot reliably judge a male’s quality from his signal. However, as time goes on, the poorer condition males must drop out of the competition, leaving only the better ones and making it easier for a female to pick a high quality mate.”

Predictions from a new of these processes were tested using three-spined sticklebacks, a species of fish in which breeding males develop a red throat in order to attract females (see photo below). Sticklebacks can breed several times over the course of the summer, but pay a heavy price since few survive for another year.

Dr Lindström said: “We found that the redness of the males changed over the summer, with all starting out red but only those in good condition being able to sustain their colour. As predicted by our model, females seemed to ignore the redness of a male when choosing a mate in early summer, and only developed a preference for redder males later, once it became a more honest signal of a male’s quality.”

So it seems that the attempts by poor quality males to hide their weaknesses behind a flashy display were only partially successful, which helps explain why the system persists, since are only persuaded by an attractive display at times when it is an honest signal of quality.

More information: The study will be published in the October print issue (available online from 21 August) of the prestigious scientific journal American Naturalist as: Lindstrom, J., Pike, T.W., Blount, J.D. & Metcalfe, N.B. (2009) Optimisation of resource allocation can explain the temporal dynamics and honesty of sexual signals.

Provided by University of Glasgow

Explore further: Evolution of competitiveness

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Masquerading in murky waters

Jul 19, 2007

Finding a decent, honest mate is challenging enough without the added problem of reduced visibility caused by human-induced changes to the aquatic environment.

Choosy females make colourful males

May 09, 2006

Female fish prefer brightly coloured males because they are easier to see and are in better shape concludes Dutch researcher Martine Maan following her study of fish speciation in the East African Lakes. Environmental variation ...

Female guppies risk death to avoid sexual harassment

Aug 06, 2008

Sexual harassment from male guppies is so bad that long-suffering females will risk their lives to escape it, according to new research from Dr Safi Darden and Dr Darren Croft from Bangor University. Their work, which was ...

Scientists report new take on sexual signaling

May 09, 2007

In dangerous environments, females looking for a mate run great risks. Scientists from Seoul National University, in Korea, and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama present a new take on sexual ...

Recommended for you

Evolution of competitiveness

Oct 29, 2014

Virtually all organisms in the living world compete with members of their own species. However, individuals differ strongly in how much they invest into their competitive ability. Some individuals are highly competitive and ...

Status shift for whale pelvic bones

Oct 29, 2014

For decades, scientists assumed that the relatively small pelvic bones found in whales were simple remnants of their land-dwelling past, "useless vestiges" that served no real purpose, akin to the human appendix ...

Is the outcome of evolution predictable?

Oct 28, 2014

If one would rewind the tape of life, would evolution result in the same outcome? The Harvard evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould came up with this famous thought experiment. He suggested that evolution would not repeat ...

How did complex life evolve? The answer could be inside out

Oct 27, 2014

A new idea about the origin of complex life turns current theories inside out. In the open access journal BMC Biology, cousins Buzz and David Baum explain their 'inside-out' theory of how eukaryotic cells, which all multic ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

finitesolutions
not rated yet Aug 21, 2009
simple_mating_algorithm:
if (trust==money)
{ stick_around(partner_in_question);}
else
{
improve_yourself();
search_more_partners();
goto simple_mating_algorithm;
}

paulthebassguy
5 / 5 (1) Aug 21, 2009
woe, mr finite solutions, I reckon you should burst out that algorithm next time you see a hot chick in a bar. pickUpLine ;
gmurphy
not rated yet Aug 22, 2009
so, we're talking about the natural equivalent of bling?
Au-Pu
not rated yet Aug 22, 2009
The researchers have made so many unfounded assumptions that this paper is virtually worthless.
It is little more than the personal opinion of the researchers and this opinion could be related more to their view of human relations than to those of the fish they were allegedly researching

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.