Climate change poker: The barriers which are preventing a global agreement

Aug 05, 2009

As the world's environment ministers, government officials, diplomats and campaigners prepare to attend the COP15 conference in Copenhagen in December 2009 to unite in the battle against climate change in one of the most complicated political deals the world has ever seen, the increasingly complex territory of climate negotiations is being revealed in an article published today, 5 August, 2009, in IOP Publishing's Environmental Research Letters.

The paper 'Tripping Points: Barriers and Bargaining Chips on the Road to Copenhagen' lays bare the main tripping points - political barriers and bargaining chips - which need to be overcome for countries to reach a consensus on how to address global climate change.

One of the key issues delegates will face in their attempt to agree on mitigation, is that what some countries see as barriers, others perceive as bargaining chips. While many developed countries, including the UK, favor extending mitigation actions to some developing countries, many developing countries will be using finance and technology transfer as a deal breaker for their consent to the overall deal.

Bargaining is expected to evolve around what is referred to as the 'chicken and egg question', that is whether actions depend on financing, or financing on actions. Researchers predict that similar to a poker game, countries will be delaying decisions until the last hours of the conference when all the bargaining chips will be on the table and parties cannot wait any longer to see who will show their hand first.

Other barriers delegates will face in their bid to reach an agreement on a post-2012 framework are issues evolving around the reduction of emissions from and forest degradation, and how to implement adaptation to .

Even if some consensus is reached in Copenhagen, there is however no guarantee a deal will be agreed on. Nevertheless, the researchers write "Regardless, however, of the perspective from which one frames the discussions, success in Copenhagen and beyond will depend on parties' ability to negotiate past the tripping points […] by finding ways to match barriers with bargaining chips in envisioning how the details of any future agreement can be hammered out in the months and years to come."

More information: www.iop.org/EJ/erl

Source: Institute of Physics (news : web)

Explore further: Spain defends Canaries oil drilling plan

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US more optimistic about climate deal after talks

Apr 28, 2009

(AP) -- The top U.S. negotiator on climate change said Tuesday that he is slightly more optimistic about striking a new international agreement to curb global warming after a two-day meeting with the world's largest emitters ...

China: rich nations must cut emissions by 40 pct

May 22, 2009

(AP) -- Wealthy nations, as history's biggest polluters, should cut greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, China says in a policy document on climate change. The government also rolled out fresh ...

Japan: China must commit on global warming

Nov 06, 2006

Japan's chief negotiator at the Kyoto conference in Nairobi Monday called on China to let the United Nations know what it is doing about greenhouse gases.

US in spotlight as UN climate talks resume

Mar 29, 2009

UN talks tasked with forging a global climate treaty by year's end were set to resume here on Sunday, with all eyes on the debut appearance of US negotiators from the administration of US President Barack ...

Recommended for you

Study shows no lead pollution in oilsands region

Oct 24, 2014

New research from a world-renowned soil and water expert at the University of Alberta reveals that there's no atmospheric lead pollution in Alberta's oilsands region—a finding that contradicts current scientific ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3432682
3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 05, 2009
Developing nations would be foolish to agree to limit CO2 production, as long as alternative energy is much more expensive as fossil fuel. Their economic growth is doing 100 times more than all the foreign aid and charitable efforts ever did. There is no substitute for real jobs, real growth, real wealth.

Besides, global warming models have flunked their tests. Climate models are no substitute for accurate theory, much less for actual temperature. The tripling of temperature through positive feedback in the climate system is apparently (i.e. obviously) false. A sensible representative for a developing nation would have to scratch his head and wonder "what global warming?".

I wonder how long the charade can continue?
lengould100
2.6 / 5 (5) Aug 05, 2009
3432682 - That's an extremely myopic view. eg. Solar thermal with thermal storage (baseload, 83% capacity) in India can be built as cheaply as coal generation, much cheaper than nuclear, IF they were given free access to all the results of the research done in the past 20 years by NREL and co-operating companies. The research has essentially all been financed by US taxpayers, but is now almost totally locked up by "co-sponsor" company patents.

That's the sort of big stumbling block remaining to be sorted out.
Arkaleus
4.5 / 5 (4) Aug 05, 2009
First among the "barriers" slowing global agreements on climate change is that their proposed resolutions are self-destructive to the societies that enact them.

All climate change "solutions" center on de-industrialization and centralization of bureaucracy. Some of them are straightforward transfers of wealth, and all of them are burdens for the people to bear.

It's time for honest reporting about these "solutions" and some real exposure of the kinds of havoc these idiotic measures would raise if enacted by a modern economy.

To invent a whole new global authority system and fund its growth through the taxation of all human activity is a clever attempt at establishing a global government. We oppose both global governance and baseless taxation and regulation based on meritless theoretical hype and propaganda.
defunctdiety
3.5 / 5 (2) Aug 05, 2009
Developing nations have a very valuable opportunity to make their society more sustainable from the ground up (urban planning is especially important, IMO). It's an opportunity that, it would seem, a developing nation owes to their people to take advantage of.
Velanarris
not rated yet Aug 06, 2009
Developing nations have a very valuable opportunity to make their society more sustainable from the ground up (urban planning is especially important, IMO). It's an opportunity that, it would seem, a developing nation owes to their people to take advantage of.


The majority of these developing nations can't keep their lights on or their fields watered let alone do anything sustainably. Hence the need for massive aid in the form of money, medicine, and food.

They're too busy starving and watching their children die of disease to care about possible global climate.