Engineers unveil new lighting solutions

Jun 09, 2009

A study by Carnegie Mellon University researchers argues that new lighting technologies can be a key player in the portfolio of strategies needed to promote energy efficiency and to help reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.

"Lighting our houses, streets and commercial buildings constitutes more than 20 percent of total U.S. electricity consumption. Light emitting diodes (LED) can reduce consumption and the emission of because of their conversion of electricity to visible light," said Ines Lima Azevedo, a recent Ph.D. graduate from Carnegie Mellon's Department of Engineering and Public Policy (EPP), and a researcher at the university's Climate Decision Making Center and its Electricity Industry Center.

Azevedo, along with M. Granger Morgan, the Lord Chair Professor of Engineering at Carnegie Mellon and EPP Department Head, and Fritz Morgan, chief technology officer of Philips-Color Kinetics and a Carnegie Mellon alumnus, found that some LED technologies are already cheaper than most commonly used lighting technologies. The researchers concluded that it is imperative that society moves to solid-state lighting to save money and to help the environment.

"Technology and innovation in the area of lighting has quickly become a vital aspect of the broader movement toward increased energy efficiency and responsible use of global resources," said Morgan, past chair and current member of the EPA's Science Advisory Board and the Scientific and Technical Council of the International Risk Governance Council. He is also a member of the National Academy of Science.

Morgan says white emitting diodes offer a cost-effective solution to reduce emissions during a time when the nation needs to find solutions to meet the growing needs of an energy dependant society. "In addition to providing an energy-efficient alternative, unlike the fluorescent tubes they replace, solid-state lighting is mercury free," said Morgan, co-director of Carnegie Mellon's Electricity Industry Center. The more than 500 million fluorescent tubes discarded yearly in the United States introduce an estimated four tons of dangerous mercury into the environment.

The study, published in the March 2009 edition of IEEE Spectrum Magazine, also reports that the change to more sustainable illumination systems won't happen without policy interventions.

"Even if the LED technology is cheaper on a lifecycle basis, consumers are likely to stick to what they know," Azevedo said. "We need the design of smart policies to make this transition."

In addition to championing a phased-in transition to solid-state lighting, the researchers recommend development of nationwide illumination standards for new residential and commercial construction projects.

Source: Carnegie Mellon University (news : web)

Explore further: Ambitious EU targets for renewable energies make economic sense

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Standards Set for Energy-Conserving LED Lighting

Jun 26, 2008

Scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in cooperation with national standards organizations, have taken the lead in developing the first two standards for solid-state lighting ...

Experts say cap and trade not enough

Apr 13, 2009

A team of researchers at Carnegie Mellon University report in a new policy brief that cap and trade climate policies alone will not be sufficient to put the nation on track to achieve a 50 to 80 percent reduction in greenhouse ...

First global lighting study is released

Jun 29, 2006

The first global survey of lighting uses and costs suggests the world's electric bill would greatly decrease with a switch to efficient lighting systems.

Canada's new government to ban inefficient light bulbs

Apr 25, 2007

The Honourable Gary Lunn, Minister of Natural Resources, joined by the Honourable John Baird, Minister of the Environment, announced today that Canada’s New Government is taking another important step to protect the environment ...

High-brightness breakthrough

Jun 28, 2005

As a result of cooperation between Philips Lighting, Philips Research and Novaled have announced a new record for the efficiency of high-brightness white OLEDs, a new solid state lighting technology. OLEDs are expected to ...

Recommended for you

Should the Japanese give nuclear power another chance?

Oct 24, 2014

On September 9, 2014, the Japan Times reported an increasing number of suicides coming from the survivors of the March 2011 disaster. In Minami Soma Hospital, which is located 23 km away from the power plant, ...

UK wind power share shows record rise

Oct 24, 2014

The United Kingdom wind power production has been enjoying an upward trajectory, and on Tuesday wind power achieved a significant energy production milestone, reported Brooks Hays for UPI. High winds from Hurricane Gonzalo were the force behind wind turbines outproducing nuclear power ...

Global boom in hydropower expected this decade

Oct 24, 2014

An unprecedented boom in hydropower dam construction is underway, primarily in developing countries and emerging economies. While this is expected to double the global electricity production from hydropower, it could reduce ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dirk_bruere
5 / 5 (1) Jun 09, 2009
LED lamps can reasonable be expected to have a 50,000 hour life, or longer. For all intents and purposes they never wear out (if done right). Given their long life they are already cost effective compared to most other forms of lighting. However, they are still dropping in cost and rising in efficiency so I would put their major mass market breakthrough point about 5 years away.
Nik_2213
not rated yet Jun 09, 2009
Um, 'plug compatible' (110/220 VAC)versions may still have a problem with 'early failure'...

;-( Looks up at dead example in light-fitting over desk.)
dachpyarvile
5 / 5 (1) Jun 09, 2009
Don't buy LED lamps to save the planet. It will not make a difference one way or another. Do buy them to save money, however. I have replaced half my lighting with LED options and have already cut my electric bill by nearly 40%!

Also, don't buy cheapie variety LED lighting. They do tend to burn out because they often use substandard components and do not take into consideration current fluctuations in various areas of the world in their designs.
dachpyarvile
not rated yet Jun 09, 2009
I forgot to add that I have also been able to leave some of them on 24/7 and still have had reductions in my electric bill.

One can also prevent shortening of life for larger arrays of LEDs by introducing a voltage and current regulation circuit into the array. It will make the array larger but there will be no worry about shortening the life of the entire strand. One might consider using flourescent tube designs when possible in order to fit the entire arrays and circuits. Otherwise, there are other options for building one's own designs.
poi
4 / 5 (1) Jun 10, 2009
uhm... says new lighting solution... LED has been there for years... don't know what's new here...
poorly titled article. more like "Policies needed for new lighting solutions"