US abortion views shift, majority are 'pro-life': poll

May 15, 2009

US opinion on abortion has shifted with, for the first time in nearly 15 years, a narrow 51-percent majority identifying themselves as "pro-life," according to a new Gallup poll published Friday.

The "pro-life," anti-abortion opinion has risen from 44 percent a year ago, while the number of Americans who described themselves as "pro-choice" fell from 50 percent a year ago to 42 percent now.

The results "represent a significant shift," said Gallup, which interviewed 1,015 adults from May 7-10.

For the middle ground poll, Gallup said 53 percent of Americans believe should be legal under certain circumstances, about even from a year ago.

This opinion's high point came under Democrat president Bill Clinton in 1997 when 67 percent said abortion should be legal under certain circumstances.

By comparison, the extreme views on remain polarized, with 23 percent saying abortion should be barred under any circumstances -- up from 17 percent a year ago -- and 22 percent maintaining the action should be allowed in "most circumstances," down from 28 percent last year.

The change in opinion has come due to a distinct tightening of ranks among on the ethical, and bio-ethical, issues.

The percentage of Republicans calling themselves "pro-life" jumped 10 percent in the last year from 60 to 70 percent, as little change was registered among Democrats and those who lean Democratic.

The opinion shift has coincided with the positions taken by the administration of President , which opened the funding gates to organizations that sponser abortion and revived .

Marking the controversy has been the vocal protests to Obama's visit to the major Catholic university Notre Dame at the weekend.

The "pro-life" position among Catholics has risen seven points in the last year -- to 52 percent -- as Protestants have registered an eight point increase to 59 percent, Gallup found.

For the first time in a decade, more men are against abortion (54 percent) than women (49 percent).

Gallup said their maximum sampling error was plus or minus three percent.

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: Strategies can help docs lower their tax burden

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Poll says drinking frequency on the rise

Aug 02, 2006

The number of people in the United States who drink alcohol is holding steady but a Gallup Poll says the frequency of alcohol consumption is rising.

Poll: Bush not trusted on healthcare

Feb 22, 2007

A new poll suggests that U.S. citizens do not trust U.S. President George Bush to reform the nation's healthcare system while 50 percent trust the Democrats.

Recommended for you

The human race evolved to be fair for selfish reasons

11 hours ago

"Make sure you play fairly," often say parents to their kids. In fact, children do not need encouragement to be fair, it is a unique feature of human social life, which emerges in childhood. When given the o ...

Non-stop PET/CT scan provides accurate images

Sep 18, 2014

Siemens is improving PET/CT imaging and data quality while reducing radiation exposure. The Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT scanner is a new positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) system that, ...

Experts: Chopin's heart shows signs of TB

Sep 17, 2014

The preserved heart of composer Frederic Chopin contains signs of tuberculosis and possibly some other lung disease, medical experts said Wednesday.

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NeilFarbstein
2.2 / 5 (6) May 15, 2009
i dont believe it. The poll was flawed.
vos
3.4 / 5 (7) May 15, 2009
flawed? like the logic behind the pro-abortion / anti death penalty mindset?
brant
3 / 5 (4) May 15, 2009
They must have asked churchies!
light_echo123
3.4 / 5 (5) May 15, 2009
A poll is at it's best the consensus of the people polled, and at it's worst a misrepresentation of what the general public think on a given topic, and used by people to give an illegitimate voice to my thoughts when I have not had the choice to speak.

So yes. The poll was flawed, whatever the outcome.
Soylent
1 / 5 (2) May 15, 2009
"pro-life", until they're born.
Ethelred
5 / 5 (1) May 16, 2009
Either the article or the actual poll is flawed. The poll apears flawed from internal evidence in the article. It states that the Democrats remained the same as a percentage. It states that the Republicans became more strongly anti-abortion. There are at present less Republicans than there were in the past. Those numbers don't match up well.

Therefor either the poll is flawed in some way or the article is badly written. The usual way for a poll to be flawed is the specifics of the questions asked and I note that they don't give the specifics. This is not just something I see happening at Physorg a site that often has badly written articles. It seems endemic to most articles covering polls.

Without the details any poll is worthless. Often even with the details once you see the actual questions.

Ethelred
fcnotpdaaj
2.1 / 5 (7) May 16, 2009
The more knowledge about the life of an unborn child becomes known, the more pro-life a sane person becomes. Its hard to kill someone who is viewed as human. Everyone who has a brain knows life begins at conception. Only misguided crazies deny this fact.

Now getting pro abortionists to tell the truth is about as hard as getting a democratic leader to tell the truth,
Soylent
3.6 / 5 (7) May 16, 2009
Everyone who has a brain knows life begins at conception. Only misguided crazies deny this fact.


What a delightful strawman.

Skin cells on my ass are fully alive and you can remove some and keep them alive. They are clearly human cells. Yet nobody accuses me of murder when I scratch my ass; why is that?
GrayMouser
5 / 5 (2) May 16, 2009
i dont believe it. The poll was flawed.

Polls are easy to fix to produce the desired results. All you have to do is alter the wording of the questions and/or answer choices. Ask anyone in advertising or psychological warfare.
Ethelred
3.4 / 5 (5) May 17, 2009
Everyone who has a brain knows life begins at conception. Only misguided crazies deny this fact.


Only misguided religious people think Human Life is independent of brains. Specifically the cerebral cortex. While I can see a person deciding your way for yourself I don't think its your business to make that decision for others.

In Japan babies aren't official till they are a month old. That's after birth not conception. A hole nation is crazy according to you.

When a person thinks everyone else is crazy they need to take a closer look at themselves.

Ethelred
Roj
1 / 5 (1) May 18, 2009
Deranged-religious fanatical views increase in populations as such progenitors reproduce more offspring than other groups.

Any group differentiated by avoiding birth control and/or abortion may produce more children, and pass along similar values to their larger families.

Natural selection favors the reproductive winners, even when they disagree with Darwin. Theology tries to control paternity, often removes the goalie during intercourse, and frequently refuses to call the results unplanned or a mistake.

In my humble opinion, Religious-Fundamental governments rise as more affluent perspectives die out with less reproductive influence, or with relatively less control of reproductive paternity.