The rise of oxygen caused Earth's earliest ice age

May 07, 2009
The evolution of organic photosynthesis ca.2.5 billion years ago would have had a profound effect on Earth's surface environments, and potentially on aerobic respiration by eukaryotes.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Geologists may have uncovered the answer to an age-old question - an ice-age-old question, that is. It appears that Earth's earliest ice ages may have been due to the rise of oxygen in Earth's atmosphere, which consumed atmospheric greenhouse gases and chilled the earth.

Alan J. Kaufman, professor of geology at the University of Maryland, Maryland geology colleague James Farquhar, and a team of scientists from Germany, South Africa, Canada, and the U.S.A., uncovered evidence that the oxygenation of Earth's - generally known as the Great Oxygenation Event - coincided with the first widespread ice age on the planet.

"We can now put our hands on the rock library that preserves evidence of irreversible atmospheric change," said Kaufman. "This singular event had a profound effect on the climate, and also on life."

Using sulfur isotopes to determine the content of ~2.3 billion year-old rocks in the Transvaal Supergroup in South Africa, they found evidence of a sudden increase in atmospheric oxygen that broadly coincided with physical evidence of glacial debris, and geochemical evidence of a new world-order for the .

"The sulfur isotope change we recorded coincided with the first known anomaly in the carbon cycle. This may have resulted from the diversification of photosynthetic life that produced the oxygen that changed the atmosphere," Kaufman said.

Two and a half billion years ago, before the Earth's atmosphere contained appreciable oxygen, photosynthetic bacteria gave off oxygen that first likely oxygenated the surface of the ocean, and only later the atmosphere. The first formed oxygen reacted with iron in the oceans, creating iron oxides that settled to the ocean floor in sediments called banded iron-formations - layered deposits of red-brown rock that accumulated in ocean basins worldwide. Later, once the iron was used up, oxygen escaped from the oceans and started filling up the atmosphere.

Once oxygen made it into the atmosphere, Kaufman's team suggests that it reacted with methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, to form carbon dioxide, which is 62 times less effective at warming the surface of the planet. "With less warming potential, surface temperatures may have plummeted, resulting in globe-encompassing glaciers and sea ice" said Kaufman.

In addition to its affect on climate, the rise in oxygen stimulated the rise in stratospheric ozone, our global sunscreen. This gas layer, which lies between 12 and 30 miles above the surface, decreased the amount of damaging ultraviolet sunrays reaching the oceans, allowing photosynthetic organisms that previously lived deeper down, to move up to the surface, and hence increase their output of oxygen, further building up stratospheric ozone.

"New oxygen in the atmosphere would also have stimulated weathering processes, delivering more nutrients to the seas, and may have also pushed biological evolution towards eukaryotes, which require free oxygen for important biosynthetic pathways," said Kaufman.

The result of the Great Oxidation Event, according to Kaufman and his colleagues, was a complete transformation of Earth's atmosphere, of its climate, and of the life that populated its surface. The study is published in the May issue of Geology.

Source: University of Maryland (news : web)

Explore further: Improving forecasts for rain-on-snow flooding

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Climate change and the rise of atmospheric oxygen

Mar 23, 2006

Today's climate change pales in comparison with what happened as Earth gave birth to its oxygen-containing atmosphere billions of years ago. By analyzing clues contained in rocks, scientists at the Carnegie Institution's ...

Did a nickel famine trigger the 'Great Oxidation Event'?

Apr 08, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The Earth's original atmosphere held very little oxygen. This began to change around 2.4 billion years ago when oxygen levels increased dramatically during what scientists call the "Great ...

New Evidence About the Rise of Oxygen

Oct 25, 2005

Scientists believe that oxygen first showed up in the atmosphere about 2.7 billion years ago. They think it was put there by a one-celled organism called "cyanobacteria," which had recently become the first living thing on ...

Recommended for you

Improving forecasts for rain-on-snow flooding

15 hours ago

Many of the worst West Coast winter floods pack a double punch. Heavy rains and melting snow wash down the mountains together to breach riverbanks, wash out roads and flood buildings.

The Greenland Ice Sheet: Now in HD

16 hours ago

The Greenland Ice Sheet is ready for its close-up. The highest-resolution satellite images ever taken of that region are making their debut. And while each individual pixel represents only one moment in time, ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tkjtkj
5 / 5 (5) May 07, 2009
I strongly object to PhysOrg's habit of entitling articles incorrectly! This article says ".. MAY " . Your title, however, makes a statement that indicates
'certainty'! A certainty that does not exist.

Please wake up, and decide whether to deal with 'science' or to deal with 'misleading headline publishing'... Fox News does enough of that for any planet!

CSharpner
2.4 / 5 (5) May 07, 2009
I agree with tkjtkj, except Fox News is one of the few that are closer to the truth, while MSNBC, CNN, and the like spew only one side, constantly.
dbren
3 / 5 (4) May 07, 2009
It's funnier if you call it "Faux News". Get it? FAUX News! Ha! Ha! Ha!

Of course, the gag only works if you don't know how to pronounce "faux".
brant
1 / 5 (2) May 07, 2009
Guessing again????
mikiwud
1.6 / 5 (7) May 08, 2009
Guessing again????

This is good and understandable reasoning. More chance of being correct than the AGW con.
El_Nose
1 / 5 (1) May 08, 2009
-- Fox news - shows both sides of issues -- not only president bush's side -- but vice president cheney --- But seriously CNN is against whoever is in power, used to think they were a democratic new station to oppose FOX but its just not true -- they just spin against whatever the ruling majority is but we all know more than a few of the anchors seem to be Democrats they still give very stark and critical analysis of their actions

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.