Apple sued for stifling iPod tricks

Apr 28, 2009
Internet rights champions have accused Apple of stifling free speech by bullying OdioWorks into ending online sharing of ways to get iPods to work with music websites other than iTunes. Attorneys from nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) teamed with OdioWorks lawyers to file a lawsuit against California-based Apple in a US federal court.

Internet rights champions have accused Apple of stifling free speech by bullying OdioWorks into ending online sharing of ways to get iPods to work with music websites other than iTunes.

Attorneys from nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) teamed with OdioWorks lawyers to file a lawsuit against California-based Apple in a US federal court.

At the heart of the issue is the BluWiki website that details ways to get Apple's popular iPhones and iPod MP3 players to synchronize music and video files with media at services such as Songbird, Banshee, Rockbox, and Winamp.

BluWiki operates as a "public service" with visitors able to freely edit or modify content on web pages in wiki-style collaborative efforts, according to OdioWorks, which owns the website.

"Hobbyists" at BluWiki shared insights about reverse-engineering Apple software and making it possible for iPod and owners to "manage their media with whatever program they chose," the lawsuit states.

BluWiki terminated the forum late last year after Apple attorneys threatened to sue OdioWorks for spreading word of how to circumvent its technology.

Apple zealously guards iTunes' status as an exclusive content delivery and management tool for iPod and iPhone hardware.

"Apple's legal threats against BluWiki are about censorship, not about protecting their legitimate copyright interests," said EFF senior staff attorney Fred von Lohmann.

"It's legal to engage in reverse engineering in order to create a competing product, it's legal to talk about reverse engineering, and it's legal for a public wiki to host those discussions."

Apple did not respond to an AFP request for comment.

The lawsuit asks the court to declare that BluWiki is doing nothing wrong by hosting talk of how to get iPhones and to work with websites other than and to tell Apple to back off its legal threats.

"I take the free speech rights of BluWiki users seriously," said OdioWorks owner Sam Odio, owner of OdioWorks.

"Companies like should not be able to censor online discussions by making baseless legal threats against services like BluWiki that host the discussions."

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: BlackBerry courts iPhone users with cash

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Apple sues Creative Technologies

May 19, 2006

In the ongoing legal dispute between digital media player rivals, Apple filed a U.S. lawsuit this week against Creative for patent infringement.

Apple files 2nd countersuit against Creative

Jun 08, 2006

(AP) -- Apple Computer Inc. has filed a second countersuit against SIngapore-based Creative Technology Ltd., intensifying its legal battle against the smaller media player rival that sued the iPod maker for ...

Apple Invades the Living Room

Apr 01, 2007

With the long-awaited Apple TV home entertainment adapter, consumers can see for themselves whether Apple's iPod magic can extend into the living room.

New Roxio 'Crunch' Outputs Video to iTunes

May 09, 2007

Sonic Solutions' Roxio division released Roxio Crunch on Tuesday, a software package that is being pitched as an easy soluton to transcode video to the Apple TV and other Apple hardware.

HP Adds iPod shuffle to Digital Music Player Lineup

Jul 01, 2005

Rounding out its lineup of digital music players, HP today added the Apple iPod shuffle from HP. HP is offering two models: the $99.99 512 megabyte version, which holds up to 120 songs, and the $129.99 1 gigabyte version, whi ...

New iPod mini Starting at Just $199

Feb 23, 2005

AppleĀ® today unveiled the second generation iPodĀ® mini lineup with a new 4GB model priced at just $199 and a new 6GB model with 50 percent more storage priced at $249. Both iPod mini models feature increased ...

Recommended for you

Toyota finds new air bag issue, recalls more cars

2 hours ago

Toyota Motor Corp. recalled more than 40,000 vehicles in Japan on Thursday as part of a worldwide scare over defective air bags and is investigating a new type of air bag problem that could lead to further recalls.

Netflix sues Yahoo CIO for alleged kickbacks

16 hours ago

Netflix is suing a former company vice president who is now chief information officer at Yahoo, accusing him of receiving money from vendors he hired to work with the video streaming company.

BlackBerry courts iPhone users with cash

Nov 25, 2014

Canadian smartphone maker BlackBerry is wooing Apple customers with a cash offer for trade-ins of iPhones for its new square-screened, keyboard-equipped Passport.

HP earnings show continued struggle

Nov 25, 2014

Venerable tech giant Hewlett-Packard has been struggling for three years to turn its business around. Its latest earnings show it still has more work ahead.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (4) Apr 28, 2009
Free speach is essiential to the western world. And regradless of the technicalities of reverse engineering Apples digital rights software, you still have a right to discuss it.

As a second point, the whole point of free markets is the ability of products being able to openly compete. I think this could be comparable to the outcries against MS and internet explorer of the beginning of the decade, whereas it's the Ipod and the supplyer of the music this time round. It is Apple abusing it's monopoly and stifling competition. Not the best way to foster innovation in a capitalist nation.
5 / 5 (3) Apr 28, 2009
Instead of attempting to reverse engineer the devices, here's a better idea - just don't buy them in the first place. Why are people so desperate to be kicked around by Apple?
1 / 5 (2) Apr 28, 2009
I neither love or hate Apple. But I can see that they should be free to provide a service and device as a single product and not get sucked into a legal limbo zone of having to supporting other people's services or products and not get accused of anti-competitive monopoly practices using their own service.

I have seen how these cases get argued in court and if Apple doesn't try to stop the practice they become defacto supporters of third party development and then become subject to all the baggage that entails including implied anti-competitive statues.
not rated yet Apr 28, 2009
These cases seem so silly. They can do whatever they want with their product. When people see they can't sync their player with winamp or whatever player they want, they won't use the ipod. I just think of the waste of money being spent on trials like these.
not rated yet Apr 28, 2009
It is interesting to observe that, for a hyper-hyped product, people have to develop 1001 apps, add-ins and work-arounds to have the device perform as they wish..!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.