Quake predictability still distant dream, say seismologists

Apr 07, 2009 by Richard Ingham and Anne Chaon
Rescuers search the remains of a building that collapsed in the earthquake in the Italian city of L'Aquila, on April 07, 2009. Claims by an Italian technician to have foretold the devastating quake prompted seismologists on Tuesday to shake their heads in sadness and skepticism.

Claims by an Italian technician to have foretold the devastating quake which struck central Italy prompted seismologists on Tuesday to shake their heads in sadness and skepticism.

No proven method exists, they said, for predicting earthquakes with any accuracy -- and the best way to save lives from Earth's wrath is to beef up construction standards and educate people about seismic risk.

"No scientist, as far as I am aware, anywhere around the world, has been able to predict an , in terms of saying exactly, when, where and how big it will be," Brian Baptie, a seismologist with British Geological Survey (BGS) in Edinburgh, told AFP.

"We know where earthquakes occur in certain parts of the world, we know for instance that earthquakes occur down the spine of Italy, in the .

"But saying when and crucially how big they will be is beyond us at the moment. Prediction at the moment is just not possible."

Hours after the quake struck Italy's Abruzzo region on Monday, inflicting a death toll that on Tuesday rose beyond the 200 mark, Giampaolo Giuliani, a technician at the National Institute of Astrophysics, unleashed a storm.

He said he had predicted the event by detecting a surge in emissions of gas that leaked from stressed rocks, but his warning had been stifled by the authorities.

Remy Bossu, a researcher at the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), said the idea of using radon, a radioactive gas naturally sequestered by certain rocks, as a telltale for impending quakes dated back to the 1970s.

"So far, nothing has been proven," he said.

"You have to know exactly what you are measuring," he said. "Radon emissions depend on many factors. For instance, if atmospheric pressure falls, it's easier for radon to escape from the earth's crust. It's very difficult to make a coherent comparison of emission levels."

"There are lots of people who are looking at radon levels in the world, and so far they have not been able to establish a correlation" with earthquake occurrence, said Yann Kinger of the Institute for the Physics of the Globe in Paris (IPGP).

In Monday's quake, "something must have happened in the Earth's crust for the radon concentrations to have changed," he said. "But was it pure coincidence that the earthquake happened just afterwards, or was there a connection?"

Other prediction methods that have been tried, tested and found flawed include using geo-electric sensors to measure large induced currents of electricity in rocks; monitoring flows of groundwater in seismic zones; and even using animals as zoological soothsayers.

Sometimes intriguing data emerge, but they have never developed into anything of use.

"To evacuate a civilian population, you have to know with high accuracy and reliability where the quake is going to occur, its magnitude and when it's going to happen," said Bossu.

"In addition, you have to be warned sufficiently early to get things organised. You don't evacuate a city in just 20 minutes."

At present, all seismologists can do is warn that a well-researched seismic zone is at risk of a bust at some point in coming years or decades.

Baptie said the picture was not entirely pessimistic.

More knowledge was accumulating as to how a major quake transmits energy to other parts of Earth's crust, building up pressure -- and thus the likelihood of a fault rupture -- elsewhere.

In long faults, this "domino" effect was demonstrated after the December 26, 2004 earthquake that unleashed the Indian Ocean tsunami.

Within months, it was followed, as predicted by Northern Ireland seismologist John McCloskey, by another massive temblor along the same fault west of Sumatra.

In the absence of a predictive tool, Baptie pleaded for strengthening and enforcing building standards and educating people in seismic zones about the danger.

"The type of places that are really at risk are these mega-cities in developing countries," he said. "They are at serious risk of a large earthquake that could cause a huge amount of damage."

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: NASA image: Fires in the southern United States

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mountain spine is a quake hotspot

Apr 06, 2009

Scientists said a killer earthquake that struck central Italy on Monday occurred in a notorious trouble spot and warned further powerful shocks in the coming months could not be ruled out.

New hazard estimates could downplay quake dangers

Apr 16, 2008

The dangers posed by a major earthquake in the New Madrid and Charleston, South Carolina zones in the Midwestern and Southern parts of the United States may be noticeably lower than current estimates if seismologists adjust ...

Prelude to an earthquake?

Dec 09, 2005

A geophysicist from the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) has identified possible seismic precursors to two recent California earthquakes, including the 1989 Loma ...

Ill. earthquake a wake-up call

Apr 20, 2008

A U.S. seismologist said the earthquake that jolted the Midwest Friday is a reminder of the risks seismic events pose outside familiar quake areas.

Earthquake in Illinois could portend an emerging threat

Apr 24, 2008

To the surprise of many, the earthquake on April 18, 2008, about 120 miles east of St. Louis, originated in the Wabash Valley Fault and not the better-known and more-dreaded New Madrid Fault in Missouri's ...

Recommended for you

NASA sees Tropical Storm Ana still vigorous

39 minutes ago

NASA's TRMM satellite saw that Tropical Storm Ana was still generating moderate rainfall is it pulled away from Hawaii. The next day, NASA's Aqua satellite saw that wind shear was having an effect on the ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

am_Unition
2 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2009
I think we all understand just how important science is when human lives are on the table. Research on earthquake prediction receives nowhere near enough funding in consideration of what can be gained from refining our abilities to recognize warning signs.

Google "earthquake precursor VLF ionosphere" and behold a wealth of studies indicating the proper avenues for pursuing quake predictions.
THEY
2 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2009
==="No scientist, as far as I am aware, anywhere around the world, has been able to predict an earthquake, in terms of saying exactly, when, where and how big it will be," Brian Baptie, a seismologist with British Geological Survey (BGS) in Edinburgh, told AFP.===
==="To evacuate a civilian population, you have to know with high accuracy and reliability where the quake is going to occur, its magnitude and when it's going to happen," said Bossu.===


Of course you can't predict an earthquake with 100% certainty. Nor do you want to cause panic amongst the public, but if you do it properly, you can definitely warn people of heightened risk. I wouldn't pull my kid from school, leave my job and run to the hills if someone said we could have an earthquake, but I definitely would make sure my car was full of gas, and make sure I have enough perishable food for a few days. And avoid the high death risk areas for sure!

There are MANY indicators. But since no one can predict with 100% certainty, they brush it off. This is pure ignorance. They SHOULD offer this man an apology.
weewilly
2 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2009
What a shame to have these things occur and take us by surprise. We need so much more in studying these natural disasters and it begins with prioritizing our allocations of manpower and monies. Since earthquakes are found all over the world but in more concentrated techtonic plate areas that seems to be a good place to stay away from if you can. At least not to move there. I'm listening and looking at the History Channel right now and they are talking about the earthquake history of Los Angeles California. 13 million people live there and they still expect a big one to occur. Well people like to live in big metropolitan areas for work or plearure of the arts etc... Its a gamble isn't it? We haven't done enough sciece to correct, cure or prevent many modern problems we have. Wow, so much work has to be done. When will we do it?
out7x
1 / 5 (1) Apr 09, 2009
We have the technology to predict quakes. Multi-component geophones, 3D seismic arrays, geomechanical measurements in wells. Stress fields can be measured. The cost is the obstacle.