'Push! breathe! eat!' -- snacks OK while in labour: study

Mar 24, 2009

Eating while in the throes of childbirth should no longer be a medical taboo, according to a study released Wednesday.

The duration of labour, the need for assisted , and caesarean rates were all unaffected by munching between contractions, found the study, published by the .

Doctors the world over have long discouraged women in labour from eating, for fear that it could lead to breathing food into the lungs in the case of an emergency caesarean while under general anaesthetic.

But such incidents have declined dramatically in recent years, mainly due to the use of local anaesthesia.

Moreover, some doctors have long argued that fasting while in labour -- which can last many, many hours -- may be bad for the mother and the baby.

Studies to date have been inconclusive, so a research team led by Professor Andrew Shennan at King's College London investigated the effect of eating during labour on delivery rates.

The study split 2,426 first-time into two groups. The first was only allowed to drink water, the usual practice.

The second group were encouraged to snack regularly on bread, biscuits, fruits, low fat yoghurt, , and .

Across a wide range of measures -- , duration of labour, percentage of caesareans -- there was virtually no difference between the two groups.

Even the rate of vomiting, about 35 percent, was the same.

Nor were the babies affected by their mothers munching, or not, during labour.

(c) 2009 AFP

Explore further: Smoking out the facts in the E-cigarette debate

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Is HIV testing during labor feasible?

Feb 27, 2009

Cameroon is a sub-Saharan African country with high HIV rates yet many pregnant women do not know their HIV status. Research published in the open access journal BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth has shown that HIV testing during ...

British doctors argue over Caesareans

Sep 22, 2006

More experienced doctors present during the final stages of labor would mean a lot less emergency Caesarean sections, a British report says.

Pain-free childbirth? Get real!

Mar 14, 2008

A pain-free and drug-free labour may be many expectant mothers’ dream but a review in the open access journal BMC Medicine reveals that reality hits hard. Most women's labour experiences differ markedly from their expect ...

Caesarean births pose higher risks for mother and baby

Oct 31, 2007

Women having a non-emergency caesarean birth have double the risk of illness or even death compared to a vaginal birth, according to a study from Latin America published today on British Medical Journal website.

Recommended for you

Smoking out the facts in the E-cigarette debate

23 minutes ago

Electronic cigarettes seem to have become as ubiquitous as the vapor they produce. Their popularity has been skyrocketing over the past two years, even in the midst of a fierce debate about their potential ...

Women, work and the menopause

1 hour ago

Menopausal women fear age-based discrimination in the workplace and face a glaring lack of menopause-specific support, according to new research.

Cohabiting couples differ on contraceptive use by class

2 hours ago

Most cohabiting couples intend to delay childbirth until they're married, steadily employed and financially stable. Despite these preferences, surprise pregnancies are common, particularly among working-class men and women ...

Nurse turnover assessments inconsistent

3 hours ago

(HealthDay)—More than 17 percent of new nurses leave their first job within one year of starting, according to research published online Aug. 25 in Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice.

User comments : 0