Eating while in the throes of childbirth should no longer be a medical taboo, according to a study released Wednesday.
The duration of labour, the need for assisted delivery, and caesarean rates were all unaffected by munching between contractions, found the study, published by the British Medical Journal.
Doctors the world over have long discouraged women in labour from eating, for fear that it could lead to breathing food into the lungs in the case of an emergency caesarean while under general anaesthetic.
But such incidents have declined dramatically in recent years, mainly due to the use of local anaesthesia.
Moreover, some doctors have long argued that fasting while in labour -- which can last many, many hours -- may be bad for the mother and the baby.
Studies to date have been inconclusive, so a research team led by Professor Andrew Shennan at King's College London investigated the effect of eating during labour on delivery rates.
The study split 2,426 first-time healthy mothers into two groups. The first was only allowed to drink water, the usual practice.
The second group were encouraged to snack regularly on bread, biscuits, fruits, low fat yoghurt, isotonic drinks, and fruit juice.
Across a wide range of measures -- spontaneous vaginal delivery, duration of labour, percentage of caesareans -- there was virtually no difference between the two groups.
Even the rate of vomiting, about 35 percent, was the same.
Nor were the babies affected by their mothers munching, or not, during labour.
(c) 2009 AFP
Explore further: Smoking out the facts in the E-cigarette debate