A human failure, seen at face value

Mar 13, 2009 by Anne Trafton
A human failure, seen at face value

(PhysOrg.com) -- Humans excel at recognizing faces, but how we do this has been an abiding mystery in neuroscience and psychology. In an effort to explain our success in this area, researchers are taking a closer look at how and why we fail.

A new study from MIT looks at a particularly striking instance of failure: our impaired ability to recognize faces in photographic negatives. The study, which appears in the this week, suggests that a large part of the answer might lie in the brain's reliance on a certain kind of image feature.

The work could potentially lead to , for settings as diverse as industrial quality control or object and . On a different front, the results and methodologies could help researchers probe face-perception skills in children with autism, who are often reported to experience difficulties analyzing facial information.

Anyone who remembers the days before digital photography has probably noticed that it's much harder to identify people in photographic negatives than in normal photographs. "You have not taken away any information, but somehow these faces are much harder to recognize," says Pawan Sinha, an associate professor of brain and cognitive sciences and senior author of the PNAS study.

Sinha has previously studied light and dark relationships between different parts of the face, and found that in nearly every normal , a person's eyes appear darker than the forehead and cheeks. He theorized that are hard to recognize because they disrupt these very strong regularities around the eyes.

To test this idea, Sinha and his colleagues asked subjects to identify photographs of famous people in not only positive and , but also in a third type of image in which the celebrities' eyes were restored to their original levels of luminance, while the rest of the photo remained in negative.

Subjects had a much easier time recognizing these "contrast chimera" images. According to Sinha, that's because the light/dark relationships between the eyes and surrounding areas are the same as they would be in a normal image.

Similar contrast relationships can be found in other parts of the face, primarily the mouth, but those relationships are not as consistent. "The relationships around the eyes seem to be particularly significant," says Sinha.

Other studies have shown that people with autism tend to focus on the mouths of people they are looking at, rather than the eyes, so the new findings could help explain why autistic people have such difficulty recognizing faces, says Sinha.

The findings also suggest that neuronal responses in the brain may be based on these relationships between different parts of the face. The team found that when they scanned the brains of people performing the recognition task, regions associated with facial processing (the fusiform face areas) were far more active when looking at the contrast chimeras than when looking at pure negatives.

Other authors of the paper are Sharon Gilad of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and MIT postdoctoral associate Ming Meng, both of whom contributed equally to the work..

Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (news : web)

Explore further: US aims for traumatic brain injury clinical trial success

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The nose knows: 2 fixation points needed for face recognition

Oct 20, 2008

Many of us are bad at remembering names but we are very quick to point out that at least we never forget a face. Never mind recognizing a familiar face- how is it that we recognize faces at all? Facial recognition is so automatic ...

Here's looking at you, fellow!

Mar 02, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Already Charles Darwin investigated facial expressions of monkeys in order to find out how closely related humans and monkeys really are. Scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Biological ...

Study shows faces are processed like words

Mar 07, 2005

Although they are dramatically different, words and faces are both recognized by parts, according to a study published in February in the Journal of Vision, an online, free access publication of the Association for Research ...

Out of sight, out of mind? Not really

Aug 23, 2005

By playing a trick on the brain, neuroscientists at MIT's McGovern Institute for Brain Research have discovered one way that humans naturally recognize objects.

Recommended for you

US aims for traumatic brain injury clinical trial success

1 hour ago

An unprecedented, public-private partnership funded by the Department of Defense (DoD) is being launched to drive the development of better-run clinical trials and may lead to the first successful treatments for traumatic ...

New learning mechanism for individual nerve cells

6 hours ago

The traditional view is that learning is based on the strengthening or weakening of the contacts between the nerve cells in the brain. However, this has been challenged by new research findings from Lund University in Sweden. ...

USC memory scientist Richard Thompson dies at 84

23 hours ago

Richard F. Thompson, the University of Southern California neuroscientist whose experiments with rabbits led to breakthrough discoveries on how memories are physically stored in the brain, has died. He was 84.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dev2000
not rated yet Mar 13, 2009
I guess the "eyes" have it then!

Haw haw haw haw haw!

(silence)
dbren
not rated yet Mar 13, 2009
Interesting, in that I've been spending the last couple weeks going through negatives of pictures I took in my teens and twenties to scan in for a "slide show" for a friend's upcoming 50th birthday party. While there have been a few images that I haven't found the first few times looking for them (in a roll a knew they were in) I really haven't had any trouble identifying my friends and family members in the images, despite the age difference, in the negatives. Perhaps familiarity of the face plays a role here. Then again, I spent hours a day in darkrooms in my mid-late teens (as a middle school and high school newspaper and annual photographer), so maybe negative recognition is a skill that can be learned.
PPihkala
not rated yet Mar 13, 2009
Dbren, that would make sense: If one can learn to recognize negative images, it means that normally we have also learned to recognize the normal images. And since autistic people mostly look at the mouths of people, they are less adapt at learning this normal face recognition concerning area around eyes. It also tells that the persons training autistic people should tell them to focus to eyes, to make them learn in the correct way.
el_gramador
not rated yet Mar 15, 2009
So basic business commentary then. "Look them straight in the eyes and have your goal in mind."