Sometimes 100 Cents Feels Like It's Worth More Than A Dollar

Jan 21, 2009 by Jeff Grabmeier

(PhysOrg.com) -- We all know that $1 is equal to 100 cents. But a new study suggests that, in some situations, people may behave as if 100 cents actually has more value.

That’s because people may pay more attention to the size of the numbers involved than the actual economic value, according to the research.

“In some cases, money may just serve as a score - the higher number wins, regardless of the actual value,” said John Opfer, co-author of the study and assistant professor of psychology at Ohio State University.

One important implication of this is that economic rewards don't necessarily affect behavior because of their economic value, Opfer said. Sometimes, it’s the numeric value of economic rewards that makes the difference. So people are more impressed by 100 cents than they are with $1, because 100 is larger than 1.

Opfer conducted the study with Ellen Furlong, a graduate student in psychology at Ohio State. Their study appears in the January 2009 issue of the journal Psychological Science.

The study involved testing subjects using a version of an often-used game in psychology, called the prisoner’s dilemma. In this version, two players had to decide separately and privately whether they were going to cooperate with each other or defect against their partner in exchange for a monetary reward.

If they both privately said they would cooperate, they both earned $3. If just one decided to defect, he earned $5 while the other person earned nothing. If they both chose to defect, they both earned only $1.

The game is designed to see under which conditions people will decide to cooperate with each other. Previous studies have shown that people are more likely to cooperate when the stakes are higher. In other words, players would be more likely to cooperate when they could both earn $300 for cooperating versus when they could only earn $3 for cooperating.

But Opfer said he wanted to find out whether it was really the economic value that predicted people’s decisions -- or simply the number value.

So in one study, the researchers had 48 college students play the prisoner’s dilemma game. Half of them played for dollars, and half played for the equivalent amount in cents. For example, some pairs could earn $3 for mutual cooperation, while others would earn 300 cents. They played the game 80 times in a row.

The study showed that the students who played for 300 cents cooperated more often than those who played for 3 dollars - even though both groups were playing for the same economic reward.

That means that those students playing for 300 cents acted as if they had more at stake than did those who were playing for 3 dollars.

“People were keeping track of the numbers, and not necessarily the values that were at stake,” Opfer said.

In a second study, the researchers tested to make sure that the findings from the first study didn’t result from a preference for dollars or cents, rather than a preference for higher numeric rewards.

Results of this study showed that players cooperated a similar number of times whether they were playing for $300 or 300 cents, even though the economic values are obviously extremely different.

They also cooperated a similar amount of times for $3 as they would for 3 cents - but there were fewer instances of cooperation here than there were for $300 or 300 cents.

“It shows that the effects of dollars or cents is minimal when people are deciding whether to cooperate- all that matters is whether you’re playing for a “3” or a “300,” Opfer said.

“The incentive to cooperate isn’t really an economic incentive. It is a confusability about numbers.”

The fact that people are easily impressed by large numbers has many real-world implications. For instance, while the economic difference between $3 and $5 is identical to the economic difference between $103 and $105 ($2 in both cases), the difference between 3 and 5 feels more important to us than the difference between 103 and 105.

“The differences between big numbers don’t seem as important to us as the differences between small numbers,” he said. “We think about the numbers differently.”

These findings challenge some basic assumptions about how people make decisions. For one thing, political parties or large corporations may be willing to cooperate when dealing with large amounts of money, such as in the recent $700 billion bailout of the financial industry, simply because they are awed by the large numbers, Opfer said.

For smaller amounts, like the proposed $15 billion bailout of the auto industry, people would be expected to be less cooperative.

“We’re not alone in our tendency to treat differences between small numbers as more important than differences among large numbers -- pigeons, rats, monkeys and human infants all do the same thing,” Opfer said.

Political parties and large corporations aside, when an individual decides whether to save for the future, or evaluates the risk of an investment, their decisions may also be influenced by the size of the numbers involved, according to Opfer.

“For better or worse, reframing our choices in terms of smaller numbers allow us to better see the relative risks and benefits of our decisions,” he said.

Provided by Ohio State University

Explore further: Study finds how parents respond to their infant's babbling can speed the child's language development

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Asian inventions dominate energy storage systems

Aug 19, 2014

In recent years, the number of patent applications for electrochemical energy storage technologies has soared. According to a study by the Technical University Munich, the largest volume of applications is ...

New water balance calculation for the Dead Sea

Jul 22, 2014

The drinking water resources on the eastern, Jordanian side of the Dead Sea could decline severe as a result of climate change than those on the western, Israeli and Palestinian side. This is the conclusion ...

Rich boys more competitive in economic experiments

Jul 04, 2014

Why do we make the choices that we do? Are we born this way or have we become this way? The behavioural economists are looking for answers by the use of economic and math exercises in the laboratory.

Recommended for you

Fear, safety and the role of sleep in human PTSD

2 hours ago

The effectiveness of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatment may hinge significantly upon sleep quality, report researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine and Veterans ...

Collaborative care improves depression in teens

21 hours ago

How best to care for the many adolescents who have depression? In a collaborative care intervention, a care manager continually reached out to teens—delivering and following up on treatment in a primary-care setting (the ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gopher65
not rated yet Jan 21, 2009
This is indeed interesting, and it confirms what many of us have suspected for some time.

The common example of this is this:

You go to buy an iPhone. At the store you learn that the iPhone is 200 dollars here, and 150 at a store an hour away. Do you make the drive? Probably.

On the same day, you buy an OLED TV. You find out that the TV is 5000 dollars here, and 4950 dollars at a store an hour away. Do you make the trip to the other store, or do you buy it here? You probably buy it here.

The amount of money saved is the same in both instances, but we all deal with comparative percentages in our heads, not absolute numbers. It's a flaw in our thought process.
Marquette
5 / 5 (3) Jan 21, 2009
Smart

My dad gave me one dollar bill
'Cause I'm his smartest son,
And I swapped it for two shiny quarters
'Cause two is more than one!

And then I took the quarters
And traded them to Lou
For three dimes -- I guess he don't know
That three is more than two!

Just then, along came old blind Bates
And just 'cause he can't see
He gave me four nickels for my three dimes,
And four is more than three!

And I took the nickels to Hiram Coombs
Down at the seed-feed store,
And the fool gave me five pennies for them,
And five is more than four!

And then I went and showed my dad,
And he got red in the cheeks
And closed his eyes and shook his head--
Too proud of me to speak!

- Shel Silverstein
slh
not rated yet Jan 21, 2009
Just ask the employees of the Bluth company--they sure get excited when GOB showers them with a dollar worth of pennies.
Rick69
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 21, 2009
Consider that sometimes, the metal value of 100 pennies is worth more than $1 dollar.
WolfAtTheDoor
5 / 5 (1) Jan 21, 2009
Doyle Brunson, the grandfather of modern poker always preached playing in games that used chips over real money because people are more willing to part with chips. It's interesting that our minds interfere with a rational analysis.
MichaelJM
not rated yet Jan 25, 2009
Kind of makes me wonder whether the marketing technique of pricing something at $2.99 rather than $3 is actually effective. Though I'm sure someone has done studies to prove that it actually is.